研究精神分裂症的遗传风险对行为特征的影响。

IF 8.3 2区 材料科学 Q1 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Adam Socrates, Jessye Maxwell, Kylie P Glanville, Marta Di Forti, Robin M Murray, Evangelos Vassos, Paul F O'Reilly
{"title":"研究精神分裂症的遗传风险对行为特征的影响。","authors":"Adam Socrates,&nbsp;Jessye Maxwell,&nbsp;Kylie P Glanville,&nbsp;Marta Di Forti,&nbsp;Robin M Murray,&nbsp;Evangelos Vassos,&nbsp;Paul F O'Reilly","doi":"10.1038/s41537-020-00131-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To characterise the trait-effects of increased genetic risk for schizophrenia, and highlight potential risk mediators, we test the association between schizophrenia polygenic risk scores (PRSs) and 529 behavioural traits (personality, psychological, lifestyle, nutritional) in the UK Biobank. Our primary analysis is performed on individuals aged 38-71 with no history of schizophrenia or related disorders, allowing us to report the effects of schizophrenia genetic risk in the sub-clinical general population. Higher schizophrenia PRSs were associated with a range of traits, including lower verbal-numerical reasoning (P = 6 × 10<sup>-61</sup>), higher nervous feelings (P = 1 × 10<sup>-46</sup>) and higher self-reported risk-taking (P = 3 × 10<sup>-38</sup>). We follow-up the risk-taking association, hypothesising that the association may be due to a genetic propensity for risk-taking leading to greater migration, urbanicity or drug-taking - reported environmental risk factors for schizophrenia, and all positively associated with risk-taking in these data. Next, to identify potential disorder or medication effects, we compare the PRS-trait associations in the general population to the trait values in 599 medicated and non-medicated individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia in the biobank. This analysis highlights, for example, levels of BMI, physical activity and risk-taking in cases in the opposite directions than expected from the PRS-trait associations in the general population. Our analyses offer simple yet potentially revealing insights into the possible causes of observed trait-disorder associations, which can complement approaches such as Mendelian Randomisation. While we urge caution in causal interpretations in PRS cross-trait studies that are highly powered to detect weak horizontal pleiotropy or population structure, we propose that well-designed polygenic score analyses have the potential to highlight modifiable risk factors that lie on the path between genetic risk and disorder.</p>","PeriodicalId":5,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1038/s41537-020-00131-2","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating the effects of genetic risk of schizophrenia on behavioural traits.\",\"authors\":\"Adam Socrates,&nbsp;Jessye Maxwell,&nbsp;Kylie P Glanville,&nbsp;Marta Di Forti,&nbsp;Robin M Murray,&nbsp;Evangelos Vassos,&nbsp;Paul F O'Reilly\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41537-020-00131-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To characterise the trait-effects of increased genetic risk for schizophrenia, and highlight potential risk mediators, we test the association between schizophrenia polygenic risk scores (PRSs) and 529 behavioural traits (personality, psychological, lifestyle, nutritional) in the UK Biobank. Our primary analysis is performed on individuals aged 38-71 with no history of schizophrenia or related disorders, allowing us to report the effects of schizophrenia genetic risk in the sub-clinical general population. Higher schizophrenia PRSs were associated with a range of traits, including lower verbal-numerical reasoning (P = 6 × 10<sup>-61</sup>), higher nervous feelings (P = 1 × 10<sup>-46</sup>) and higher self-reported risk-taking (P = 3 × 10<sup>-38</sup>). We follow-up the risk-taking association, hypothesising that the association may be due to a genetic propensity for risk-taking leading to greater migration, urbanicity or drug-taking - reported environmental risk factors for schizophrenia, and all positively associated with risk-taking in these data. Next, to identify potential disorder or medication effects, we compare the PRS-trait associations in the general population to the trait values in 599 medicated and non-medicated individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia in the biobank. This analysis highlights, for example, levels of BMI, physical activity and risk-taking in cases in the opposite directions than expected from the PRS-trait associations in the general population. Our analyses offer simple yet potentially revealing insights into the possible causes of observed trait-disorder associations, which can complement approaches such as Mendelian Randomisation. While we urge caution in causal interpretations in PRS cross-trait studies that are highly powered to detect weak horizontal pleiotropy or population structure, we propose that well-designed polygenic score analyses have the potential to highlight modifiable risk factors that lie on the path between genetic risk and disorder.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":5,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1038/s41537-020-00131-2\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41537-020-00131-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41537-020-00131-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

为了描述精神分裂症遗传风险增加的性状效应,并突出潜在的风险中介,我们测试了英国生物银行中精神分裂症多基因风险评分(prs)与529种行为特征(人格、心理、生活方式、营养)之间的关系。我们的主要分析对象是年龄在38-71岁之间,没有精神分裂症或相关疾病病史的个体,这使我们能够报告精神分裂症遗传风险在亚临床一般人群中的影响。较高的精神分裂症PRSs与一系列特征相关,包括较低的语言-数值推理能力(P = 6 × 10-61)、较高的紧张感觉(P = 1 × 10-46)和较高的自我报告冒险精神(P = 3 × 10-38)。我们对风险承担关联进行了跟踪,假设这种关联可能是由于风险承担的遗传倾向导致更大的迁移、城市化或吸毒——报告的精神分裂症的环境风险因素,这些数据中都与风险承担呈正相关。接下来,为了确定潜在的疾病或药物效应,我们将普通人群的prs -性状关联与生物库中599名被诊断为精神分裂症的药物和非药物个体的性状值进行了比较。例如,该分析强调,在一般人群中,BMI、体力活动和冒险程度的水平与预期的prs特征关联方向相反。我们的分析为观察到的性状-障碍关联的可能原因提供了简单但潜在的揭示性见解,可以补充孟德尔随机化等方法。虽然我们敦促在PRS交叉性状研究中谨慎解释因果关系,这些研究在检测弱水平多效性或群体结构方面非常有效,但我们建议设计良好的多基因评分分析有可能突出遗传风险和疾病之间路径上的可改变风险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Investigating the effects of genetic risk of schizophrenia on behavioural traits.

Investigating the effects of genetic risk of schizophrenia on behavioural traits.

Investigating the effects of genetic risk of schizophrenia on behavioural traits.

Investigating the effects of genetic risk of schizophrenia on behavioural traits.

To characterise the trait-effects of increased genetic risk for schizophrenia, and highlight potential risk mediators, we test the association between schizophrenia polygenic risk scores (PRSs) and 529 behavioural traits (personality, psychological, lifestyle, nutritional) in the UK Biobank. Our primary analysis is performed on individuals aged 38-71 with no history of schizophrenia or related disorders, allowing us to report the effects of schizophrenia genetic risk in the sub-clinical general population. Higher schizophrenia PRSs were associated with a range of traits, including lower verbal-numerical reasoning (P = 6 × 10-61), higher nervous feelings (P = 1 × 10-46) and higher self-reported risk-taking (P = 3 × 10-38). We follow-up the risk-taking association, hypothesising that the association may be due to a genetic propensity for risk-taking leading to greater migration, urbanicity or drug-taking - reported environmental risk factors for schizophrenia, and all positively associated with risk-taking in these data. Next, to identify potential disorder or medication effects, we compare the PRS-trait associations in the general population to the trait values in 599 medicated and non-medicated individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia in the biobank. This analysis highlights, for example, levels of BMI, physical activity and risk-taking in cases in the opposite directions than expected from the PRS-trait associations in the general population. Our analyses offer simple yet potentially revealing insights into the possible causes of observed trait-disorder associations, which can complement approaches such as Mendelian Randomisation. While we urge caution in causal interpretations in PRS cross-trait studies that are highly powered to detect weak horizontal pleiotropy or population structure, we propose that well-designed polygenic score analyses have the potential to highlight modifiable risk factors that lie on the path between genetic risk and disorder.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
6.30%
发文量
4978
审稿时长
1.8 months
期刊介绍: ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces is a leading interdisciplinary journal that brings together chemists, engineers, physicists, and biologists to explore the development and utilization of newly-discovered materials and interfacial processes for specific applications. Our journal has experienced remarkable growth since its establishment in 2009, both in terms of the number of articles published and the impact of the research showcased. We are proud to foster a truly global community, with the majority of published articles originating from outside the United States, reflecting the rapid growth of applied research worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信