进入和参与社区活动,以及脊髓损伤患者的生活质量。

The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine Pub Date : 2022-07-01 Epub Date: 2021-01-19 DOI:10.1080/10790268.2020.1860867
Ali Lakhani, Sanjoti Parekh, David P Watling, Peter Grimbeek, Ross Duncan, Susan Charlifue, Elizabeth Kendall
{"title":"进入和参与社区活动,以及脊髓损伤患者的生活质量。","authors":"Ali Lakhani,&nbsp;Sanjoti Parekh,&nbsp;David P Watling,&nbsp;Peter Grimbeek,&nbsp;Ross Duncan,&nbsp;Susan Charlifue,&nbsp;Elizabeth Kendall","doi":"10.1080/10790268.2020.1860867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to investigate the association between self-reported accessibility and engagement with health services and places in the community, and quality of life (QOL) for people with spinal cord damage (SCD).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional survey.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Community.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Two-hundred and sixty-six people with a SCD residing in Australia (<i>M<sub>age</sub></i> = 62.34, <i>SD<sub>age</sub></i> = 15.95).</p><p><strong>Outcome measure: </strong>The International Spinal Cord Injury Quality of Life Basic Data Set.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Univariate regressions demonstrated that accessing a higher number of places in the community was significantly associated with favorable self-reported psychological health (<i>β</i> = .160, P < .01), physical health (<i>β</i> = .144, P < .01), overall well-being (<i>β</i> = .206, P < .01), and QOL (<i>β</i> = .187, P < .01). In contrast, reporting a higher number of inaccessible places was significantly associated with unfavorable self-reported psychological health (<i>β</i> = -.171, P < .01), physical health (<i>β</i> = -.270, P < .001), overall well-being (<i>β</i> = -.238, P < .001), and QOL (<i>β</i> = -.244, P < .001). Being older and living with injury or onset of damage longer were significantly associated with favorable scores across all outcomes (P < .01) except physical health.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Community engagement can have a considerable impact on the self-reported health and QOL of people with SCD. Interventions aimed at increasing community engagement, particularly for people who have recently experienced SCD are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":501560,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"522-530"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10790268.2020.1860867","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Access and engagement with places in the community, and the quality of life among people with spinal cord damage.\",\"authors\":\"Ali Lakhani,&nbsp;Sanjoti Parekh,&nbsp;David P Watling,&nbsp;Peter Grimbeek,&nbsp;Ross Duncan,&nbsp;Susan Charlifue,&nbsp;Elizabeth Kendall\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10790268.2020.1860867\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to investigate the association between self-reported accessibility and engagement with health services and places in the community, and quality of life (QOL) for people with spinal cord damage (SCD).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional survey.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Community.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Two-hundred and sixty-six people with a SCD residing in Australia (<i>M<sub>age</sub></i> = 62.34, <i>SD<sub>age</sub></i> = 15.95).</p><p><strong>Outcome measure: </strong>The International Spinal Cord Injury Quality of Life Basic Data Set.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Univariate regressions demonstrated that accessing a higher number of places in the community was significantly associated with favorable self-reported psychological health (<i>β</i> = .160, P < .01), physical health (<i>β</i> = .144, P < .01), overall well-being (<i>β</i> = .206, P < .01), and QOL (<i>β</i> = .187, P < .01). In contrast, reporting a higher number of inaccessible places was significantly associated with unfavorable self-reported psychological health (<i>β</i> = -.171, P < .01), physical health (<i>β</i> = -.270, P < .001), overall well-being (<i>β</i> = -.238, P < .001), and QOL (<i>β</i> = -.244, P < .001). Being older and living with injury or onset of damage longer were significantly associated with favorable scores across all outcomes (P < .01) except physical health.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Community engagement can have a considerable impact on the self-reported health and QOL of people with SCD. Interventions aimed at increasing community engagement, particularly for people who have recently experienced SCD are warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":501560,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"522-530\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10790268.2020.1860867\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2020.1860867\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2020.1860867","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的:本研究旨在探讨脊髓损伤(SCD)患者自我报告的可及性和参与社区卫生服务和场所与生活质量(QOL)之间的关系。设计:横断面调查。设置:社区。参与者:266名居住在澳大利亚的SCD患者(Mage = 62.34, SDage = 15.95)。结果测量:国际脊髓损伤生活质量基本数据集。结果:单变量回归表明,在社区中访问更多的地方与良好的自我报告心理健康显著相关(β =。160, p β =。144, p β =。206, p β =。p β = -。171 p β = -。p β = -。238, p β = -244、P结论:社区参与对SCD患者自我报告的健康和生活质量有相当大的影响。有必要采取干预措施,增加社区参与,特别是最近经历了SCD的人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Access and engagement with places in the community, and the quality of life among people with spinal cord damage.

Access and engagement with places in the community, and the quality of life among people with spinal cord damage.

Objectives: This study aims to investigate the association between self-reported accessibility and engagement with health services and places in the community, and quality of life (QOL) for people with spinal cord damage (SCD).

Design: Cross-sectional survey.

Setting: Community.

Participants: Two-hundred and sixty-six people with a SCD residing in Australia (Mage = 62.34, SDage = 15.95).

Outcome measure: The International Spinal Cord Injury Quality of Life Basic Data Set.

Results: Univariate regressions demonstrated that accessing a higher number of places in the community was significantly associated with favorable self-reported psychological health (β = .160, P < .01), physical health (β = .144, P < .01), overall well-being (β = .206, P < .01), and QOL (β = .187, P < .01). In contrast, reporting a higher number of inaccessible places was significantly associated with unfavorable self-reported psychological health (β = -.171, P < .01), physical health (β = -.270, P < .001), overall well-being (β = -.238, P < .001), and QOL (β = -.244, P < .001). Being older and living with injury or onset of damage longer were significantly associated with favorable scores across all outcomes (P < .01) except physical health.

Conclusions: Community engagement can have a considerable impact on the self-reported health and QOL of people with SCD. Interventions aimed at increasing community engagement, particularly for people who have recently experienced SCD are warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信