急诊内科住院医师使用即时超声进行关节穿刺。

Open Access Emergency Medicine : OAEM Pub Date : 2021-04-16 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OAEM.S305762
Josie Acuna, Adrienne Yarnish, Elaine Situ-LaCasse, Richard Amini, Srikar Adhikari
{"title":"急诊内科住院医师使用即时超声进行关节穿刺。","authors":"Josie Acuna,&nbsp;Adrienne Yarnish,&nbsp;Elaine Situ-LaCasse,&nbsp;Richard Amini,&nbsp;Srikar Adhikari","doi":"10.2147/OAEM.S305762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The objective of this study is to determine if EM resident physicians are able to successfully utilize POCUS to perform an arthrocentesis in the ED. This is a retrospective review of ED patients who received an ultrasound-guided or ultrasound-assisted arthrocentesis performed in the ED over a 6-year period by an EM resident physician.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective review of ED patients who received an ultrasound-guided or ultrasound-assisted arthrocentesis performed in the ED over a 6-year period by an EM resident physician. An ED POCUS database was reviewed for POCUS examinations where an arthrocentesis was performed. Electronic medical records were then reviewed for demographic characteristics, history, physical examination findings, ED course, additional imaging studies, and the impact of the POCUS study on patient care and disposition.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 101 POCUS examinations of patients were included in the final analysis. The POCUS examinations and procedures were performed by 59 different EM residents at various levels of training. Overall, 92.1% (93/101) of the procedures were successful. When assessing for image quality, 98/101 (97%) had recognizable structures at minimum. The majority of the patients (84/101, 83.2%) received additional imaging of the affected joint. In the minority of cases (23/101, 22.8%), the ultrasound-assisted approach was utilized, while 78/100 (77.2%) utilized the ultrasound-guided approach. For the studies that utilized the ultrasound-guided approach, the quality of needle visualization was determined to be \"good\" 40/78 (51.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EM resident physicians are able to utilize POCUS to perform an arthrocentesis in the ED. Further research is encouraged to determine whether having residents utilize POCUS to perform an arthrocentesis has a significant impact on outcomes and patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":503614,"journal":{"name":"Open Access Emergency Medicine : OAEM","volume":"13 ","pages":"161-167"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/5b/a4/oaem-13-161.PMC8057836.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Use of Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Arthrocentesis Among Emergency Medicine Residents.\",\"authors\":\"Josie Acuna,&nbsp;Adrienne Yarnish,&nbsp;Elaine Situ-LaCasse,&nbsp;Richard Amini,&nbsp;Srikar Adhikari\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/OAEM.S305762\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The objective of this study is to determine if EM resident physicians are able to successfully utilize POCUS to perform an arthrocentesis in the ED. This is a retrospective review of ED patients who received an ultrasound-guided or ultrasound-assisted arthrocentesis performed in the ED over a 6-year period by an EM resident physician.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective review of ED patients who received an ultrasound-guided or ultrasound-assisted arthrocentesis performed in the ED over a 6-year period by an EM resident physician. An ED POCUS database was reviewed for POCUS examinations where an arthrocentesis was performed. Electronic medical records were then reviewed for demographic characteristics, history, physical examination findings, ED course, additional imaging studies, and the impact of the POCUS study on patient care and disposition.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 101 POCUS examinations of patients were included in the final analysis. The POCUS examinations and procedures were performed by 59 different EM residents at various levels of training. Overall, 92.1% (93/101) of the procedures were successful. When assessing for image quality, 98/101 (97%) had recognizable structures at minimum. The majority of the patients (84/101, 83.2%) received additional imaging of the affected joint. In the minority of cases (23/101, 22.8%), the ultrasound-assisted approach was utilized, while 78/100 (77.2%) utilized the ultrasound-guided approach. For the studies that utilized the ultrasound-guided approach, the quality of needle visualization was determined to be \\\"good\\\" 40/78 (51.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EM resident physicians are able to utilize POCUS to perform an arthrocentesis in the ED. Further research is encouraged to determine whether having residents utilize POCUS to perform an arthrocentesis has a significant impact on outcomes and patient care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":503614,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Access Emergency Medicine : OAEM\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"161-167\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/5b/a4/oaem-13-161.PMC8057836.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Access Emergency Medicine : OAEM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/OAEM.S305762\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Access Emergency Medicine : OAEM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OAEM.S305762","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:本研究的目的是确定急诊住院医师是否能够成功地利用POCUS在急诊科进行关节穿刺。这是一项回顾性研究,回顾了6年来急诊住院医师在急诊科接受超声引导或超声辅助关节穿刺的急诊科患者。方法:这是一项回顾性研究,回顾了6年来由急诊住院医师在急诊科接受超声引导或超声辅助关节穿刺的急诊科患者。我们回顾了ED POCUS数据库中进行关节穿刺的POCUS检查。然后回顾电子病历的人口学特征、病史、体格检查结果、ED病程、附加成像研究以及POCUS研究对患者护理和处置的影响。结果:101例POCUS检查纳入最终分析。59名接受过不同程度培训的急诊住院医师进行了POCUS检查和程序。总体而言,92.1%(93/101)的手术成功。在评估图像质量时,98/101(97%)至少有可识别的结构。大多数患者(84/101,83.2%)接受了受影响关节的额外影像学检查。少数病例(23/101,22.8%)采用超声辅助入路,78/100(77.2%)采用超声引导入路。在采用超声引导入路的研究中,40/78(51.3%)的针尖显示质量为“良好”。结论:急诊住院医师能够在急诊科使用POCUS进行关节穿刺。鼓励进一步的研究来确定住院医师使用POCUS进行关节穿刺是否对预后和患者护理有重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Use of Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Arthrocentesis Among Emergency Medicine Residents.

Introduction: The objective of this study is to determine if EM resident physicians are able to successfully utilize POCUS to perform an arthrocentesis in the ED. This is a retrospective review of ED patients who received an ultrasound-guided or ultrasound-assisted arthrocentesis performed in the ED over a 6-year period by an EM resident physician.

Methods: This was a retrospective review of ED patients who received an ultrasound-guided or ultrasound-assisted arthrocentesis performed in the ED over a 6-year period by an EM resident physician. An ED POCUS database was reviewed for POCUS examinations where an arthrocentesis was performed. Electronic medical records were then reviewed for demographic characteristics, history, physical examination findings, ED course, additional imaging studies, and the impact of the POCUS study on patient care and disposition.

Results: A total of 101 POCUS examinations of patients were included in the final analysis. The POCUS examinations and procedures were performed by 59 different EM residents at various levels of training. Overall, 92.1% (93/101) of the procedures were successful. When assessing for image quality, 98/101 (97%) had recognizable structures at minimum. The majority of the patients (84/101, 83.2%) received additional imaging of the affected joint. In the minority of cases (23/101, 22.8%), the ultrasound-assisted approach was utilized, while 78/100 (77.2%) utilized the ultrasound-guided approach. For the studies that utilized the ultrasound-guided approach, the quality of needle visualization was determined to be "good" 40/78 (51.3%).

Conclusion: EM resident physicians are able to utilize POCUS to perform an arthrocentesis in the ED. Further research is encouraged to determine whether having residents utilize POCUS to perform an arthrocentesis has a significant impact on outcomes and patient care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信