医疗补助扩大和健康保险覆盖范围以及心理健康状况个体的治疗利用。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Samuel H Zuvekas, Chandler B McClellan, Mir M Ali, Ryan Mutter
{"title":"医疗补助扩大和健康保险覆盖范围以及心理健康状况个体的治疗利用。","authors":"Samuel H Zuvekas,&nbsp;Chandler B McClellan,&nbsp;Mir M Ali,&nbsp;Ryan Mutter","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Affordable Care Act (ACA) gives states the option of expanding Medicaid coverage to low-income individuals; however, not all states have chosen to expand Medicaid. The ACA Medicaid expansions are particularly important for Americans with mental health conditions because they are substantially more likely than other Americans to have low incomes.</p><p><strong>Aims of the study: </strong>We examine the impact of Medicaid expansion on adults who were newly eligible for Medicaid using the 2008-2017 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We use the AHRQ PUBSIM model to identify low-income adults aged 19-64 who were either newly Medicaid eligible if they lived in an expansion state or would have been eligible had their state opted to expand its Medicaid program. We estimate linear probability models within a difference-in-difference framework. An additional interaction term allows us to test for differences among those with serious psychological distress (SPD) or probable depression (PD). Outcomes of interest are insurance coverage by type, behavioral health treatment by service (specifically, any behavioral health treatment, any specialty treatment, any psychotropic medication, any ambulatory treatment outside of an emergency department, and any emergency department treatment), quantities of behavioral health treatment services, and out of pocket spending on healthcare.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our adjusted difference-in-differences estimates indicate Medicaid expansion increased any insurance coverage by 14.2 percentage points and increased Medicaid coverage by 21.2 percentage points. Insurance coverage for individuals with SPD/PD in expansion states increased by an additional 12.9 percentage points. Medicaid expansion did not have an effect on behavioral health treatment for the newly eligible population as a whole or for the subset with SPD/PD.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Consistent with previous Medicaid expansions, we find that the ACA Medicaid expansions substantially increased insurance rates for the newly Medicaid-eligible population, regardless of mental health status but the overall effect on insurance coverage was stronger among those with SPD/PD. The lack of an effect on treatment use suggests that providing insurance coverage alone may be insufficient to guarantee that people with mental illness will receive the treatment they need. Limitations include that our difference-in-difference estimator may not account for time-varying factors that change contemporaneously with the expansions. Our estimates may also be affected by other provisions of the ACA that went into effect at the same time as the Medicaid expansions. IMPLICATIONS FOR HEALTH CARE PROVISION AND USE AND IMPLICATIONS FOR HEALTH POLICIES: Although the ACA has resulted in increased coverage for low-income individuals, more outreach efforts may be needed to encourage individuals with mental illness to get the treatment they need.</p>","PeriodicalId":46381,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics","volume":"23 3","pages":"151-182"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medicaid Expansion and Health Insurance Coverage and Treatment Utilization among Individuals with a Mental Health Condition.\",\"authors\":\"Samuel H Zuvekas,&nbsp;Chandler B McClellan,&nbsp;Mir M Ali,&nbsp;Ryan Mutter\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Affordable Care Act (ACA) gives states the option of expanding Medicaid coverage to low-income individuals; however, not all states have chosen to expand Medicaid. The ACA Medicaid expansions are particularly important for Americans with mental health conditions because they are substantially more likely than other Americans to have low incomes.</p><p><strong>Aims of the study: </strong>We examine the impact of Medicaid expansion on adults who were newly eligible for Medicaid using the 2008-2017 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We use the AHRQ PUBSIM model to identify low-income adults aged 19-64 who were either newly Medicaid eligible if they lived in an expansion state or would have been eligible had their state opted to expand its Medicaid program. We estimate linear probability models within a difference-in-difference framework. An additional interaction term allows us to test for differences among those with serious psychological distress (SPD) or probable depression (PD). Outcomes of interest are insurance coverage by type, behavioral health treatment by service (specifically, any behavioral health treatment, any specialty treatment, any psychotropic medication, any ambulatory treatment outside of an emergency department, and any emergency department treatment), quantities of behavioral health treatment services, and out of pocket spending on healthcare.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our adjusted difference-in-differences estimates indicate Medicaid expansion increased any insurance coverage by 14.2 percentage points and increased Medicaid coverage by 21.2 percentage points. Insurance coverage for individuals with SPD/PD in expansion states increased by an additional 12.9 percentage points. Medicaid expansion did not have an effect on behavioral health treatment for the newly eligible population as a whole or for the subset with SPD/PD.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Consistent with previous Medicaid expansions, we find that the ACA Medicaid expansions substantially increased insurance rates for the newly Medicaid-eligible population, regardless of mental health status but the overall effect on insurance coverage was stronger among those with SPD/PD. The lack of an effect on treatment use suggests that providing insurance coverage alone may be insufficient to guarantee that people with mental illness will receive the treatment they need. Limitations include that our difference-in-difference estimator may not account for time-varying factors that change contemporaneously with the expansions. Our estimates may also be affected by other provisions of the ACA that went into effect at the same time as the Medicaid expansions. IMPLICATIONS FOR HEALTH CARE PROVISION AND USE AND IMPLICATIONS FOR HEALTH POLICIES: Although the ACA has resulted in increased coverage for low-income individuals, more outreach efforts may be needed to encourage individuals with mental illness to get the treatment they need.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46381,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics\",\"volume\":\"23 3\",\"pages\":\"151-182\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:《平价医疗法案》(ACA)让各州可以选择将医疗补助扩大到低收入人群;然而,并不是所有的州都选择扩大医疗补助计划。ACA医疗补助计划的扩大对有精神健康问题的美国人尤其重要,因为他们比其他美国人更有可能是低收入人群。研究目的:我们使用2008-2017年医疗支出小组调查(MEPS)检查了医疗补助扩张对新获得医疗补助资格的成年人的影响。方法:我们使用AHRQ PUBSIM模型来确定19-64岁的低收入成年人,如果他们生活在扩大医疗补助计划的州,他们要么是新获得医疗补助资格的人,要么是如果他们的州选择扩大医疗补助计划,他们就有资格获得医疗补助。我们在差中差框架内估计线性概率模型。一个额外的相互作用项允许我们测试严重心理困扰(SPD)或可能患有抑郁症(PD)的患者之间的差异。感兴趣的结果是按类型划分的保险覆盖范围、按服务划分的行为健康治疗(具体而言,任何行为健康治疗、任何专业治疗、任何精神药物、急诊部门以外的任何门诊治疗和任何急诊部门治疗)、行为健康治疗服务的数量以及医疗保健的自付支出。结果:我们调整后的差异估计表明,医疗补助扩张使任何保险覆盖率增加了14.2个百分点,使医疗补助覆盖率增加了21.2个百分点。扩张州SPD/PD患者的保险覆盖率又增加了12.9个百分点。医疗补助计划的扩大对符合条件的新人群整体或SPD/PD子集的行为健康治疗没有影响。讨论:与之前的医疗补助扩张一致,我们发现ACA医疗补助扩张大幅提高了新获得医疗补助的人群的保险费率,无论其心理健康状况如何,但对SPD/PD患者的保险覆盖率的总体影响更强。缺乏对治疗使用的影响表明,仅提供保险范围可能不足以保证精神疾病患者得到所需的治疗。局限性包括我们的差中差估计器可能无法考虑随扩展同时变化的时变因素。我们的估计也可能受到与医疗补助扩张同时生效的ACA其他条款的影响。对卫生保健提供和使用的影响以及对卫生政策的影响:尽管ACA增加了低收入人群的覆盖范围,但可能需要更多的推广努力来鼓励精神疾病患者获得他们需要的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Medicaid Expansion and Health Insurance Coverage and Treatment Utilization among Individuals with a Mental Health Condition.

Background: The Affordable Care Act (ACA) gives states the option of expanding Medicaid coverage to low-income individuals; however, not all states have chosen to expand Medicaid. The ACA Medicaid expansions are particularly important for Americans with mental health conditions because they are substantially more likely than other Americans to have low incomes.

Aims of the study: We examine the impact of Medicaid expansion on adults who were newly eligible for Medicaid using the 2008-2017 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS).

Methods: We use the AHRQ PUBSIM model to identify low-income adults aged 19-64 who were either newly Medicaid eligible if they lived in an expansion state or would have been eligible had their state opted to expand its Medicaid program. We estimate linear probability models within a difference-in-difference framework. An additional interaction term allows us to test for differences among those with serious psychological distress (SPD) or probable depression (PD). Outcomes of interest are insurance coverage by type, behavioral health treatment by service (specifically, any behavioral health treatment, any specialty treatment, any psychotropic medication, any ambulatory treatment outside of an emergency department, and any emergency department treatment), quantities of behavioral health treatment services, and out of pocket spending on healthcare.

Results: Our adjusted difference-in-differences estimates indicate Medicaid expansion increased any insurance coverage by 14.2 percentage points and increased Medicaid coverage by 21.2 percentage points. Insurance coverage for individuals with SPD/PD in expansion states increased by an additional 12.9 percentage points. Medicaid expansion did not have an effect on behavioral health treatment for the newly eligible population as a whole or for the subset with SPD/PD.

Discussion: Consistent with previous Medicaid expansions, we find that the ACA Medicaid expansions substantially increased insurance rates for the newly Medicaid-eligible population, regardless of mental health status but the overall effect on insurance coverage was stronger among those with SPD/PD. The lack of an effect on treatment use suggests that providing insurance coverage alone may be insufficient to guarantee that people with mental illness will receive the treatment they need. Limitations include that our difference-in-difference estimator may not account for time-varying factors that change contemporaneously with the expansions. Our estimates may also be affected by other provisions of the ACA that went into effect at the same time as the Medicaid expansions. IMPLICATIONS FOR HEALTH CARE PROVISION AND USE AND IMPLICATIONS FOR HEALTH POLICIES: Although the ACA has resulted in increased coverage for low-income individuals, more outreach efforts may be needed to encourage individuals with mental illness to get the treatment they need.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: The Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics publishes high quality empirical, analytical and methodologic papers focusing on the application of health and economic research and policy analysis in mental health. It offers an international forum to enable the different participants in mental health policy and economics - psychiatrists involved in research and care and other mental health workers, health services researchers, health economists, policy makers, public and private health providers, advocacy groups, and the pharmaceutical industry - to share common information in a common language.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信