刻蚀后清洗对二硅酸锂表面微观结构、表面形貌和微剪切结合强度的影响。

Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society Pub Date : 2020-10-01 Epub Date: 2020-10-08 DOI:10.4103/jips.jips_443_19
Nikita Agarwal, Sanchit Bansal, Umesh Yeshwanth Pai, Shobha J Rodrigues, Thilak B Shetty, Sharon J Saldanha
{"title":"刻蚀后清洗对二硅酸锂表面微观结构、表面形貌和微剪切结合强度的影响。","authors":"Nikita Agarwal,&nbsp;Sanchit Bansal,&nbsp;Umesh Yeshwanth Pai,&nbsp;Shobha J Rodrigues,&nbsp;Thilak B Shetty,&nbsp;Sharon J Saldanha","doi":"10.4103/jips.jips_443_19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study assessed the effect of postetch cleansing on the surface microstructure, surface topography, and microshear bond strength (μSBS) of lithium disilicate and the resin cement.</p><p><strong>Setting and design: </strong><i>In Vitro</i> analytical study.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Fifteen discs (10 mm diameter and 2 mm thickness) were fabricated from highly translucent lithium disilicate IPS Emax 2 ceramic (Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein). Four resin cement (RelyX Ultimate, 3M ESPE) cylinders (0.9 mm diameter and 4 mm high) were placed on each ceramic disc (total <i>n</i> = 60). The samples were divided into three groups based on the surface treatment of the ceramic discs (20 resin cement cylinders on 5 discs in each group). Group I (HF) (control) etched with 9.6% HF with no postetch cleansing, Group II (HFP) etched with 9.6% HF for 20 s followed by rinsing with water and postetching cleansing with 37% phosphoric acid, and Group III (HFPU) etched with 9.6% HF followed by active application of 37% phosphoric acid followed by postetch cleansing in ultrasonic bath for 5 min. μSBS of resin cement to ceramic surfaces was tested following a standard protocol. Surface roughness was evaluated using an atomic force microscope. Surface topography and elemental analysis were analyzed using SEM/EDX. Mode of failure was also assessed.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis used: </strong>The data were analysed using one way analysis of variance and post hoc tukeys test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The μSBS were found to be highest for Group III (HFPU), followed by Group II (HFP) followed by Group I (HF) and were statistically significant. There was a difference in the surface topography and surface microstructure between the three groups. Mode of failure was predominantly adhesive.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The μSBS, surface topography, and surface microstructure were found to be superior in the groups, in which postetch cleansing was done as compared to the control in which no postetch cleansing was done.</p>","PeriodicalId":519508,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society","volume":" ","pages":"363-370"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/64/3f/JIPS-20-363.PMC7814682.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of post etching cleansing on surface microstructure, surface topography, and microshear bond strength of lithium disilicate.\",\"authors\":\"Nikita Agarwal,&nbsp;Sanchit Bansal,&nbsp;Umesh Yeshwanth Pai,&nbsp;Shobha J Rodrigues,&nbsp;Thilak B Shetty,&nbsp;Sharon J Saldanha\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jips.jips_443_19\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study assessed the effect of postetch cleansing on the surface microstructure, surface topography, and microshear bond strength (μSBS) of lithium disilicate and the resin cement.</p><p><strong>Setting and design: </strong><i>In Vitro</i> analytical study.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Fifteen discs (10 mm diameter and 2 mm thickness) were fabricated from highly translucent lithium disilicate IPS Emax 2 ceramic (Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein). Four resin cement (RelyX Ultimate, 3M ESPE) cylinders (0.9 mm diameter and 4 mm high) were placed on each ceramic disc (total <i>n</i> = 60). The samples were divided into three groups based on the surface treatment of the ceramic discs (20 resin cement cylinders on 5 discs in each group). Group I (HF) (control) etched with 9.6% HF with no postetch cleansing, Group II (HFP) etched with 9.6% HF for 20 s followed by rinsing with water and postetching cleansing with 37% phosphoric acid, and Group III (HFPU) etched with 9.6% HF followed by active application of 37% phosphoric acid followed by postetch cleansing in ultrasonic bath for 5 min. μSBS of resin cement to ceramic surfaces was tested following a standard protocol. Surface roughness was evaluated using an atomic force microscope. Surface topography and elemental analysis were analyzed using SEM/EDX. Mode of failure was also assessed.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis used: </strong>The data were analysed using one way analysis of variance and post hoc tukeys test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The μSBS were found to be highest for Group III (HFPU), followed by Group II (HFP) followed by Group I (HF) and were statistically significant. There was a difference in the surface topography and surface microstructure between the three groups. Mode of failure was predominantly adhesive.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The μSBS, surface topography, and surface microstructure were found to be superior in the groups, in which postetch cleansing was done as compared to the control in which no postetch cleansing was done.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":519508,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"363-370\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/64/3f/JIPS-20-363.PMC7814682.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_443_19\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/10/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_443_19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/10/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:评价涂后清洗对二硅酸锂与树脂水泥表面微观结构、表面形貌及微剪切结合强度(μSBS)的影响。设置和设计:体外分析研究。材料和方法:用高半透明的二硅酸锂IPS Emax 2陶瓷(Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan,列支敦士登)制作了15个直径10 mm,厚度2 mm的圆片。四个树脂水泥(RelyX Ultimate, 3M ESPE)圆柱体(直径0.9 mm,高4mm)放置在每个陶瓷盘上(总n = 60)。根据陶瓷盘的表面处理将样品分为三组(每组5个盘上20个树脂水泥柱)。第1组(HF)(对照)用9.6% HF蚀刻,不进行蚀刻后清洗;第2组(HFP)用9.6% HF蚀刻20 s,然后用水冲洗,然后用37%磷酸进行蚀刻后清洗;第3组(HFPU)用9.6% HF蚀刻,然后主动应用37%磷酸,然后在超声波浴中进行蚀刻后清洗5 min。表面粗糙度用原子力显微镜评估。表面形貌和元素分析采用SEM/EDX进行分析。对失效模式也进行了评估。采用统计分析:采用单因素方差分析和事后随机检验对数据进行分析。结果:第三组(HFPU)的μSBS最高,第二组(HFP)次之,最后是第一组(HF),差异均有统计学意义。三组间的表面形貌和微观结构存在差异。失效方式主要是粘接。结论:洗后处理组的μSBS、表面形貌和表面微结构均优于未洗后处理组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effect of post etching cleansing on surface microstructure, surface topography, and microshear bond strength of lithium disilicate.

Effect of post etching cleansing on surface microstructure, surface topography, and microshear bond strength of lithium disilicate.

Effect of post etching cleansing on surface microstructure, surface topography, and microshear bond strength of lithium disilicate.

Effect of post etching cleansing on surface microstructure, surface topography, and microshear bond strength of lithium disilicate.

Aim: This study assessed the effect of postetch cleansing on the surface microstructure, surface topography, and microshear bond strength (μSBS) of lithium disilicate and the resin cement.

Setting and design: In Vitro analytical study.

Materials and methods: Fifteen discs (10 mm diameter and 2 mm thickness) were fabricated from highly translucent lithium disilicate IPS Emax 2 ceramic (Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein). Four resin cement (RelyX Ultimate, 3M ESPE) cylinders (0.9 mm diameter and 4 mm high) were placed on each ceramic disc (total n = 60). The samples were divided into three groups based on the surface treatment of the ceramic discs (20 resin cement cylinders on 5 discs in each group). Group I (HF) (control) etched with 9.6% HF with no postetch cleansing, Group II (HFP) etched with 9.6% HF for 20 s followed by rinsing with water and postetching cleansing with 37% phosphoric acid, and Group III (HFPU) etched with 9.6% HF followed by active application of 37% phosphoric acid followed by postetch cleansing in ultrasonic bath for 5 min. μSBS of resin cement to ceramic surfaces was tested following a standard protocol. Surface roughness was evaluated using an atomic force microscope. Surface topography and elemental analysis were analyzed using SEM/EDX. Mode of failure was also assessed.

Statistical analysis used: The data were analysed using one way analysis of variance and post hoc tukeys test.

Results: The μSBS were found to be highest for Group III (HFPU), followed by Group II (HFP) followed by Group I (HF) and were statistically significant. There was a difference in the surface topography and surface microstructure between the three groups. Mode of failure was predominantly adhesive.

Conclusion: The μSBS, surface topography, and surface microstructure were found to be superior in the groups, in which postetch cleansing was done as compared to the control in which no postetch cleansing was done.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信