马里兰桥应用作为保留非浸没性牙体种植体边缘骨水平的合适技术。

Q3 Medicine
Arash Azizi, Fausto Zamparini, Andrea Spinelli, Chiara Pirani, Maria G Gandolfi, Carlo Prati
{"title":"马里兰桥应用作为保留非浸没性牙体种植体边缘骨水平的合适技术。","authors":"Arash Azizi,&nbsp;Fausto Zamparini,&nbsp;Andrea Spinelli,&nbsp;Chiara Pirani,&nbsp;Maria G Gandolfi,&nbsp;Carlo Prati","doi":"10.23736/S0026-4970.20.04309-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>One to 6 months after implant placement is a critical time/period responsible for crestal bone loss that may affect implant osseointegration. The study aims to explore the effectiveness of provisional adhesive Maryland-bridge (AMB) applied to prevent marginal bone level (MBL) around implants placed in edentulous crestal bone in posterior area during osseointegration period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Healthy, non-smoker patients (N.=18) were included in the study. Titanium implants were placed nonsubmerged (i.e. tissue-level) with cover screws at gingival level in edentulous crestal bone with flapless technique. Nine patients randomly received an AMB, while 9 patients did not receive any AMB. Each AMB remained in place for 3 months and removed before impression. After 3 months abutments were applied, and provisional resin crowns cemented and definitive metal-ceramic crowns were cemented after 2-3 months. Periapical Rx were taken using paralleling technique before and after implant insertion, at 1, 3 months (pre-loading time) and after 6 months (post-loading time). MBL was evaluated in double-blind on scanned periapical radiographs and assessed at mesial and distal side of implants (M-MBL and D-MBL). Area of bone loss on mesial and distal side of implants (Area-M and Area-D) and Cervical Enamel Junction migration of mesial and distal adjacent teeth were also measured (CEJ-M and CEJ-D). Linear regression models were fitted to evaluate the existence of any significant difference.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two drop-out was observed in AMB group. A total of 16 patients completed the study. After 6 months, all implants were safe and free from complications. AMB group showed the most stable MBL at 1-6 months, statistically different from non-AMB and resulted in a reduced crestal bone loss from baseline compared to Non AMB group. Area-M and Area-D were not statistically different between the groups. CEJ-M and CEJ-D were stable in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of Adhesive Maryland Bridge to protect non-submerged post-extractive implants is a safe procedure that prevents bone loss around implants and preserve the 3D architecture of crestal bone ridge.</p>","PeriodicalId":18742,"journal":{"name":"Minerva stomatologica","volume":"69 6","pages":"335-342"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Maryland-bridge application as a suitable technique to preserve marginal bone level of not-submerged supracrestal implants.\",\"authors\":\"Arash Azizi,&nbsp;Fausto Zamparini,&nbsp;Andrea Spinelli,&nbsp;Chiara Pirani,&nbsp;Maria G Gandolfi,&nbsp;Carlo Prati\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S0026-4970.20.04309-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>One to 6 months after implant placement is a critical time/period responsible for crestal bone loss that may affect implant osseointegration. The study aims to explore the effectiveness of provisional adhesive Maryland-bridge (AMB) applied to prevent marginal bone level (MBL) around implants placed in edentulous crestal bone in posterior area during osseointegration period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Healthy, non-smoker patients (N.=18) were included in the study. Titanium implants were placed nonsubmerged (i.e. tissue-level) with cover screws at gingival level in edentulous crestal bone with flapless technique. Nine patients randomly received an AMB, while 9 patients did not receive any AMB. Each AMB remained in place for 3 months and removed before impression. After 3 months abutments were applied, and provisional resin crowns cemented and definitive metal-ceramic crowns were cemented after 2-3 months. Periapical Rx were taken using paralleling technique before and after implant insertion, at 1, 3 months (pre-loading time) and after 6 months (post-loading time). MBL was evaluated in double-blind on scanned periapical radiographs and assessed at mesial and distal side of implants (M-MBL and D-MBL). Area of bone loss on mesial and distal side of implants (Area-M and Area-D) and Cervical Enamel Junction migration of mesial and distal adjacent teeth were also measured (CEJ-M and CEJ-D). Linear regression models were fitted to evaluate the existence of any significant difference.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two drop-out was observed in AMB group. A total of 16 patients completed the study. After 6 months, all implants were safe and free from complications. AMB group showed the most stable MBL at 1-6 months, statistically different from non-AMB and resulted in a reduced crestal bone loss from baseline compared to Non AMB group. Area-M and Area-D were not statistically different between the groups. CEJ-M and CEJ-D were stable in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of Adhesive Maryland Bridge to protect non-submerged post-extractive implants is a safe procedure that prevents bone loss around implants and preserve the 3D architecture of crestal bone ridge.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18742,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minerva stomatologica\",\"volume\":\"69 6\",\"pages\":\"335-342\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minerva stomatologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4970.20.04309-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva stomatologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4970.20.04309-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:种植体植入后1 ~ 6个月是牙冠骨丢失的关键时期,可能会影响种植体的骨整合。本研究旨在探讨临时粘接马里兰桥(AMB)在骨整合期后区无牙嵴骨种植体周围边缘骨水平(MBL)的预防效果。方法:18例健康非吸烟患者纳入研究。钛种植体采用无瓣技术在无牙冠骨的牙龈水平用盖螺钉非浸没(即组织水平)放置。9例患者随机接受了AMB, 9例患者未接受任何AMB。每个AMB放置3个月,在印模前取出。3个月后应用基台,2-3个月后进行临时树脂冠胶合和最终金属陶瓷冠胶合。在种植体植入前后、1、3个月(预加载时间)和6个月(后加载时间)采用平行技术进行根尖周Rx治疗。在扫描的根尖周x线片上双盲评估MBL,并在种植体的内侧和远端(M-MBL和D-MBL)评估MBL。测量种植体近中、远端骨丢失面积(Area- m和Area- d)和近中、远端邻牙颈牙釉质结移位(CEJ-M和CEJ-D)。拟合线性回归模型以评估是否存在显著差异。结果:AMB组出现2例退出。共有16名患者完成了这项研究。6个月后,所有种植体均安全,无并发症。与非AMB组相比,AMB组在1-6个月时表现出最稳定的MBL,具有统计学差异,并且与非AMB组相比,从基线开始导致的牙冠骨质流失减少。Area-M和Area-D组间差异无统计学意义。两组CEJ-M和CEJ-D均稳定。结论:使用黏附马里兰桥保护非浸没的拔牙后种植体是一种安全的方法,可防止种植体周围骨丢失,并保留牙冠骨脊的三维结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Maryland-bridge application as a suitable technique to preserve marginal bone level of not-submerged supracrestal implants.

Background: One to 6 months after implant placement is a critical time/period responsible for crestal bone loss that may affect implant osseointegration. The study aims to explore the effectiveness of provisional adhesive Maryland-bridge (AMB) applied to prevent marginal bone level (MBL) around implants placed in edentulous crestal bone in posterior area during osseointegration period.

Methods: Healthy, non-smoker patients (N.=18) were included in the study. Titanium implants were placed nonsubmerged (i.e. tissue-level) with cover screws at gingival level in edentulous crestal bone with flapless technique. Nine patients randomly received an AMB, while 9 patients did not receive any AMB. Each AMB remained in place for 3 months and removed before impression. After 3 months abutments were applied, and provisional resin crowns cemented and definitive metal-ceramic crowns were cemented after 2-3 months. Periapical Rx were taken using paralleling technique before and after implant insertion, at 1, 3 months (pre-loading time) and after 6 months (post-loading time). MBL was evaluated in double-blind on scanned periapical radiographs and assessed at mesial and distal side of implants (M-MBL and D-MBL). Area of bone loss on mesial and distal side of implants (Area-M and Area-D) and Cervical Enamel Junction migration of mesial and distal adjacent teeth were also measured (CEJ-M and CEJ-D). Linear regression models were fitted to evaluate the existence of any significant difference.

Results: Two drop-out was observed in AMB group. A total of 16 patients completed the study. After 6 months, all implants were safe and free from complications. AMB group showed the most stable MBL at 1-6 months, statistically different from non-AMB and resulted in a reduced crestal bone loss from baseline compared to Non AMB group. Area-M and Area-D were not statistically different between the groups. CEJ-M and CEJ-D were stable in both groups.

Conclusions: The use of Adhesive Maryland Bridge to protect non-submerged post-extractive implants is a safe procedure that prevents bone loss around implants and preserve the 3D architecture of crestal bone ridge.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva stomatologica
Minerva stomatologica DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The journal Minerva Stomatologica publishes scientific papers on dentistry and maxillo-facial surgery. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, case reports, therapeutical notes, special articles and letters to the Editor. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (www.icmje.org). Articles not conforming to international standards will not be considered for acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信