为基于结构的虚拟筛选选择机器学习评分函数

Q1 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
Pedro J. Ballester
{"title":"为基于结构的虚拟筛选选择机器学习评分函数","authors":"Pedro J. Ballester","doi":"10.1016/j.ddtec.2020.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Interest in docking technologies has grown parallel to the ever increasing number and diversity of 3D models for macromolecular therapeutic targets. Structure-Based Virtual Screening (SBVS) aims at leveraging these experimental structures to discover the necessary starting points for the </span>drug discovery process. It is now established that Machine Learning (ML) can strongly enhance the predictive accuracy of scoring functions for SBVS by exploiting large datasets from targets, molecules and their associations. However, with greater choice, the question of which ML-based scoring function is the most suitable for prospective use on a given target has gained importance. Here we analyse two approaches to select an existing scoring function for the target along with a third approach consisting in generating a scoring function tailored to the target. These analyses required discussing the limitations of popular SBVS benchmarks, the alternatives to benchmark scoring functions for SBVS and how to generate them or use them using freely-available software.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36012,"journal":{"name":"Drug Discovery Today: Technologies","volume":"32 ","pages":"Pages 81-87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ddtec.2020.09.001","citationCount":"29","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Selecting machine-learning scoring functions for structure-based virtual screening\",\"authors\":\"Pedro J. Ballester\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ddtec.2020.09.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>Interest in docking technologies has grown parallel to the ever increasing number and diversity of 3D models for macromolecular therapeutic targets. Structure-Based Virtual Screening (SBVS) aims at leveraging these experimental structures to discover the necessary starting points for the </span>drug discovery process. It is now established that Machine Learning (ML) can strongly enhance the predictive accuracy of scoring functions for SBVS by exploiting large datasets from targets, molecules and their associations. However, with greater choice, the question of which ML-based scoring function is the most suitable for prospective use on a given target has gained importance. Here we analyse two approaches to select an existing scoring function for the target along with a third approach consisting in generating a scoring function tailored to the target. These analyses required discussing the limitations of popular SBVS benchmarks, the alternatives to benchmark scoring functions for SBVS and how to generate them or use them using freely-available software.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drug Discovery Today: Technologies\",\"volume\":\"32 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 81-87\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ddtec.2020.09.001\",\"citationCount\":\"29\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drug Discovery Today: Technologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1740674920300135\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Discovery Today: Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1740674920300135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

摘要

随着用于大分子治疗靶点的3D模型的数量和多样性不断增加,对对接技术的兴趣也在增长。基于结构的虚拟筛选(SBVS)旨在利用这些实验结构来发现药物发现过程的必要起点。现在已经确定,机器学习(ML)可以通过利用来自靶标、分子及其关联的大型数据集,大大提高SBVS评分函数的预测准确性。然而,随着选择的增加,哪个基于ml的评分函数最适合用于给定目标的问题变得越来越重要。在这里,我们分析了两种方法来为目标选择一个现有的评分函数,以及第三种方法,包括生成一个适合目标的评分函数。这些分析需要讨论流行的SBVS基准的局限性、SBVS基准评分函数的替代方案,以及如何生成它们或使用免费软件使用它们。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Selecting machine-learning scoring functions for structure-based virtual screening

Interest in docking technologies has grown parallel to the ever increasing number and diversity of 3D models for macromolecular therapeutic targets. Structure-Based Virtual Screening (SBVS) aims at leveraging these experimental structures to discover the necessary starting points for the drug discovery process. It is now established that Machine Learning (ML) can strongly enhance the predictive accuracy of scoring functions for SBVS by exploiting large datasets from targets, molecules and their associations. However, with greater choice, the question of which ML-based scoring function is the most suitable for prospective use on a given target has gained importance. Here we analyse two approaches to select an existing scoring function for the target along with a third approach consisting in generating a scoring function tailored to the target. These analyses required discussing the limitations of popular SBVS benchmarks, the alternatives to benchmark scoring functions for SBVS and how to generate them or use them using freely-available software.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Drug Discovery Today: Technologies
Drug Discovery Today: Technologies Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Drug Discovery
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Discovery Today: Technologies compares different technological tools and techniques used from the discovery of new drug targets through to the launch of new medicines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信