Mateusz Śpiewak, Joanna Petryka-Mazurkiewicz, Łukasz Mazurkiewicz, Barbara Miłosz-Wieczorek, Mirosław Kowalski, Elżbieta K Biernacka, Piotr Hoffman, Magdalena Marczak
{"title":"修复法洛四联症及其他血流动力学异常患者肺返流对右心室大小和功能的影响。","authors":"Mateusz Śpiewak, Joanna Petryka-Mazurkiewicz, Łukasz Mazurkiewicz, Barbara Miłosz-Wieczorek, Mirosław Kowalski, Elżbieta K Biernacka, Piotr Hoffman, Magdalena Marczak","doi":"10.5114/pjr.2020.101058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Right ventricular (RV) outflow tract obstruction (RVOTO) was demonstrated to be protective against RV dilatation in patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot and chronic pulmonary regurgitation (PR). We hypothesised that the presence of additional haemodynamic abnormalities (more than mild tricuspid regurgitation, residual ventricular septal defect) reduces this protective association. Accordingly, we aimed to assess the impact of PR on RV size and function in this population.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Consecutive patients with additional haemodynamic abnormalities after tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) repair, who had undergone cardiovascular magnetic resonance, were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 90 patients studied, 18 individuals (mean age 32.5 ± 10.7 years, 72.2% males) met the inclusion criteria. There were no differences in RV volumes and ejection fraction between patients with and without RVOTO. Neither PR fraction (PRF) nor PR volume (PRV) correlated with RV end-diastolic volume (<i>r</i> = 0.36; <i>p</i> = 0.15 and <i>r</i> = 0.37; <i>p</i> = 0.14, respectively, for PRF and PRV) or RV end-systolic volume (<i>r</i> = 0.2; <i>p</i> = 0.42 and <i>r</i> = 0.19; <i>p</i> = 0.45, respectively, for PRF and PRV). Similarly, no significant correlations were observed between PRF or PRV and RV ejection fraction (<i>r</i> = -0.04; <i>p</i> = 0.87 and <i>r</i> = -0.03; <i>p</i> = 0.9, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Additional haemodynamic abnormalities are associated with the abolition of the protective effect of RVOTO on RV size. There was no significant relationship between measures of PR and RV volumes in patients after TOF repair with concomitant haemodynamic abnormalities. These abnormalities acted as confounding factors in the assessment of the impact of pulmonary regurgitation on RV size and function.</p>","PeriodicalId":47128,"journal":{"name":"Polish Journal of Radiology","volume":"85 ","pages":"e607-e612"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/fb/42/PJR-85-42485.PMC7757502.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of pulmonary regurgitation on right ventricular size and function in patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot and additional haemodynamic abnormalities.\",\"authors\":\"Mateusz Śpiewak, Joanna Petryka-Mazurkiewicz, Łukasz Mazurkiewicz, Barbara Miłosz-Wieczorek, Mirosław Kowalski, Elżbieta K Biernacka, Piotr Hoffman, Magdalena Marczak\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/pjr.2020.101058\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Right ventricular (RV) outflow tract obstruction (RVOTO) was demonstrated to be protective against RV dilatation in patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot and chronic pulmonary regurgitation (PR). We hypothesised that the presence of additional haemodynamic abnormalities (more than mild tricuspid regurgitation, residual ventricular septal defect) reduces this protective association. Accordingly, we aimed to assess the impact of PR on RV size and function in this population.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Consecutive patients with additional haemodynamic abnormalities after tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) repair, who had undergone cardiovascular magnetic resonance, were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 90 patients studied, 18 individuals (mean age 32.5 ± 10.7 years, 72.2% males) met the inclusion criteria. There were no differences in RV volumes and ejection fraction between patients with and without RVOTO. Neither PR fraction (PRF) nor PR volume (PRV) correlated with RV end-diastolic volume (<i>r</i> = 0.36; <i>p</i> = 0.15 and <i>r</i> = 0.37; <i>p</i> = 0.14, respectively, for PRF and PRV) or RV end-systolic volume (<i>r</i> = 0.2; <i>p</i> = 0.42 and <i>r</i> = 0.19; <i>p</i> = 0.45, respectively, for PRF and PRV). Similarly, no significant correlations were observed between PRF or PRV and RV ejection fraction (<i>r</i> = -0.04; <i>p</i> = 0.87 and <i>r</i> = -0.03; <i>p</i> = 0.9, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Additional haemodynamic abnormalities are associated with the abolition of the protective effect of RVOTO on RV size. There was no significant relationship between measures of PR and RV volumes in patients after TOF repair with concomitant haemodynamic abnormalities. These abnormalities acted as confounding factors in the assessment of the impact of pulmonary regurgitation on RV size and function.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polish Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":\"85 \",\"pages\":\"e607-e612\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/fb/42/PJR-85-42485.PMC7757502.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polish Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/pjr.2020.101058\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/pjr.2020.101058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
目的:右心室(RV)流出道梗阻(RVOTO)对修复后法洛四联症合并慢性肺反流(PR)患者的右心室扩张具有保护作用。我们假设存在额外的血流动力学异常(超过轻度三尖瓣反流,残留的室间隔缺损)降低了这种保护性关联。因此,我们的目的是评估PR对该人群中右心室大小和功能的影响。材料和方法:纳入连续接受心血管磁共振的法洛四联症(TOF)修复后出现额外血流动力学异常的患者。结果:在所研究的90例患者中,18例(平均年龄32.5±10.7岁,男性72.2%)符合纳入标准。在有RVOTO和没有RVOTO的患者之间,右心室体积和射血分数没有差异。PR分数(PRF)和PR容积(PRV)均与右心室舒张末期容积无关(r = 0.36;P = 0.15, r = 0.37;PRF和PRV的收缩期末容积p = 0.14 (r = 0.2;P = 0.42, r = 0.19;PRF和PRV分别p = 0.45)。同样,PRF或PRV与右心室射血分数之间无显著相关性(r = -0.04;P = 0.87, r = -0.03;P = 0.9)。结论:额外的血流动力学异常与RVOTO对右心室大小的保护作用的取消有关。在TOF修复后伴有血流动力学异常的患者中,PR和RV体积之间没有显著的关系。这些异常是评估肺反流对右心室大小和功能影响的混杂因素。
The impact of pulmonary regurgitation on right ventricular size and function in patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot and additional haemodynamic abnormalities.
Purpose: Right ventricular (RV) outflow tract obstruction (RVOTO) was demonstrated to be protective against RV dilatation in patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot and chronic pulmonary regurgitation (PR). We hypothesised that the presence of additional haemodynamic abnormalities (more than mild tricuspid regurgitation, residual ventricular septal defect) reduces this protective association. Accordingly, we aimed to assess the impact of PR on RV size and function in this population.
Material and methods: Consecutive patients with additional haemodynamic abnormalities after tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) repair, who had undergone cardiovascular magnetic resonance, were included.
Results: Out of 90 patients studied, 18 individuals (mean age 32.5 ± 10.7 years, 72.2% males) met the inclusion criteria. There were no differences in RV volumes and ejection fraction between patients with and without RVOTO. Neither PR fraction (PRF) nor PR volume (PRV) correlated with RV end-diastolic volume (r = 0.36; p = 0.15 and r = 0.37; p = 0.14, respectively, for PRF and PRV) or RV end-systolic volume (r = 0.2; p = 0.42 and r = 0.19; p = 0.45, respectively, for PRF and PRV). Similarly, no significant correlations were observed between PRF or PRV and RV ejection fraction (r = -0.04; p = 0.87 and r = -0.03; p = 0.9, respectively).
Conclusions: Additional haemodynamic abnormalities are associated with the abolition of the protective effect of RVOTO on RV size. There was no significant relationship between measures of PR and RV volumes in patients after TOF repair with concomitant haemodynamic abnormalities. These abnormalities acted as confounding factors in the assessment of the impact of pulmonary regurgitation on RV size and function.