胸腔镜手术后锯肌前平面阻滞镇痛效果:一项随机对照双盲研究。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management Pub Date : 2020-12-18 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.2147/TCRM.S285244
Li Hua Shang, Zhen Nan Xiao, Ya Li Zhao, Bo Long
{"title":"胸腔镜手术后锯肌前平面阻滞镇痛效果:一项随机对照双盲研究。","authors":"Li Hua Shang,&nbsp;Zhen Nan Xiao,&nbsp;Ya Li Zhao,&nbsp;Bo Long","doi":"10.2147/TCRM.S285244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Fast-track surgery is a developing trend in medical care. It is a core challenge for clinical anesthesia to reasonably reduce the dosage of opioids and relieve postoperative pain. Serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) is a novel analgesic technique with such advantages as easy operation, good safety, and few side effects.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>In total, 60 patients aged 18 to 65 years who were diagnosed with lung cancer and scheduled for thoracoscopic resection were randomly assigned to receive SABP or local infiltration anesthesia. We analyzed the time within 48 hrs after operation to visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score of 4 or higher and the number of patients requiring additional analgesics at 6 hrs and 12 hrs after operation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The estimated median time to VAS ≥4 was 4 hrs (1.32 to 6.68) in the control group and 11 hrs (6.71 to 15.29) in the SAPB group (log-rank test: P=0.008). The number of patients requiring additional analgesics at 6- and 12 hrs after operation was significantly lower in the SAPB group than that in the control group (P<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with local infiltration, SAPB provided extended postoperative analgesia after thoracoscopic surgery with reduced consumption of additional analgesics in the early postoperative stage.</p>","PeriodicalId":48769,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management","volume":"16 ","pages":"1257-1265"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1c/73/tcrm-16-1257.PMC7755330.pdf","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analgesic Effect of Serratus Anterior Plane Block After Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Double-Blinded Study.\",\"authors\":\"Li Hua Shang,&nbsp;Zhen Nan Xiao,&nbsp;Ya Li Zhao,&nbsp;Bo Long\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/TCRM.S285244\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Fast-track surgery is a developing trend in medical care. It is a core challenge for clinical anesthesia to reasonably reduce the dosage of opioids and relieve postoperative pain. Serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) is a novel analgesic technique with such advantages as easy operation, good safety, and few side effects.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>In total, 60 patients aged 18 to 65 years who were diagnosed with lung cancer and scheduled for thoracoscopic resection were randomly assigned to receive SABP or local infiltration anesthesia. We analyzed the time within 48 hrs after operation to visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score of 4 or higher and the number of patients requiring additional analgesics at 6 hrs and 12 hrs after operation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The estimated median time to VAS ≥4 was 4 hrs (1.32 to 6.68) in the control group and 11 hrs (6.71 to 15.29) in the SAPB group (log-rank test: P=0.008). The number of patients requiring additional analgesics at 6- and 12 hrs after operation was significantly lower in the SAPB group than that in the control group (P<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with local infiltration, SAPB provided extended postoperative analgesia after thoracoscopic surgery with reduced consumption of additional analgesics in the early postoperative stage.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48769,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"1257-1265\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1c/73/tcrm-16-1257.PMC7755330.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S285244\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S285244","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

目的:快速外科手术是医疗保健的发展趋势。合理减少阿片类药物用量,减轻术后疼痛是临床麻醉面临的核心挑战。Serratus anterior plane block (SAPB)是一种新颖的镇痛技术,具有操作简单、安全性好、副作用小等优点。患者和方法:选择60例年龄18 ~ 65岁的肺癌胸腔镜切除患者,随机分为SABP组和局部浸润麻醉组。我们分析了术后48小时内视觉模拟评分(VAS)疼痛评分在4分及以上的时间,以及术后6小时和12小时需要额外镇痛药的患者人数。结果:对照组到VAS≥4的估计中位时间为4小时(1.32 ~ 6.68),SAPB组为11小时(6.71 ~ 15.29)(log-rank检验:P=0.008)。与对照组相比,SAPB组术后6 h和12 h需要额外镇痛的患者数量明显减少(p)。结论:与局部浸润相比,SAPB可延长胸腔镜术后镇痛时间,减少术后早期额外镇痛的消耗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Analgesic Effect of Serratus Anterior Plane Block After Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Double-Blinded Study.

Analgesic Effect of Serratus Anterior Plane Block After Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Double-Blinded Study.

Analgesic Effect of Serratus Anterior Plane Block After Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Double-Blinded Study.

Purpose: Fast-track surgery is a developing trend in medical care. It is a core challenge for clinical anesthesia to reasonably reduce the dosage of opioids and relieve postoperative pain. Serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) is a novel analgesic technique with such advantages as easy operation, good safety, and few side effects.

Patients and methods: In total, 60 patients aged 18 to 65 years who were diagnosed with lung cancer and scheduled for thoracoscopic resection were randomly assigned to receive SABP or local infiltration anesthesia. We analyzed the time within 48 hrs after operation to visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score of 4 or higher and the number of patients requiring additional analgesics at 6 hrs and 12 hrs after operation.

Results: The estimated median time to VAS ≥4 was 4 hrs (1.32 to 6.68) in the control group and 11 hrs (6.71 to 15.29) in the SAPB group (log-rank test: P=0.008). The number of patients requiring additional analgesics at 6- and 12 hrs after operation was significantly lower in the SAPB group than that in the control group (P<0.05).

Conclusion: Compared with local infiltration, SAPB provided extended postoperative analgesia after thoracoscopic surgery with reduced consumption of additional analgesics in the early postoperative stage.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.60%
发文量
139
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management is an international, peer-reviewed journal of clinical therapeutics and risk management, focusing on concise rapid reporting of clinical studies in all therapeutic areas, outcomes, safety, and programs for the effective, safe, and sustained use of medicines, therapeutic and surgical interventions in all clinical areas. The journal welcomes submissions covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary. The journal will consider case reports but only if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. As of 18th March 2019, Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信