糖尿病作为抗凝房颤患者主要不良心血管事件的危险因素的异质性:亚里士多德试验的分析

Raffaele De Caterina, Giuseppe Patti, Johan Westerbergh, John Horowitz, Justin A Ezekowitz, Basil S Lewis, Renato D Lopes, John J V McMurray, Dan Atar, M Cecilia Bahit, Matyas Keltai, José L López-Sendón, Witold Ruzyllo, Christopher B Granger, John H Alexander, Lars Wallentin
{"title":"糖尿病作为抗凝房颤患者主要不良心血管事件的危险因素的异质性:亚里士多德试验的分析","authors":"Raffaele De Caterina,&nbsp;Giuseppe Patti,&nbsp;Johan Westerbergh,&nbsp;John Horowitz,&nbsp;Justin A Ezekowitz,&nbsp;Basil S Lewis,&nbsp;Renato D Lopes,&nbsp;John J V McMurray,&nbsp;Dan Atar,&nbsp;M Cecilia Bahit,&nbsp;Matyas Keltai,&nbsp;José L López-Sendón,&nbsp;Witold Ruzyllo,&nbsp;Christopher B Granger,&nbsp;John H Alexander,&nbsp;Lars Wallentin","doi":"10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaa140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Whether diabetes without insulin therapy is an independent cardiovascular (CV) risk factor in atrial fibrillation (AF) has recently been questioned. We investigated the prognostic relevance of diabetes with or without insulin treatment in patients in the ARISTOTLE trial.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Patients with AF and increased stroke risk randomized to apixaban vs. warfarin were classified according to diabetes status: no diabetes; diabetes on no diabetes medications; diabetes on non-insulin antidiabetic drugs only; or insulin-treated. The associations between such patient subgroups and stroke/systemic embolism (SE), myocardial infarction (MI), and CV death were examined by Cox proportional hazard regression, both unadjusted and adjusted for other prognostic variables. Patients with diabetes were younger and had a higher body mass index. Median CHA2DS2VASc score was 4.0 in patients with diabetes and 3.0 in patients without diabetes. We found no significant difference in stroke/SE incidence across patient subgroups. Compared with no diabetes, only insulin-treated diabetes was significantly associated with higher risk. When adjusted for clinical variables, compared with no diabetes, the hazard ratios (HRs) for MI (95% confidence intervals) were for diabetes on no medication: 1.15 (0.62-2.14); for diabetes on non-insulin antidiabetic drugs: 1.32 (0.90-1.94); for insulin-treated diabetes: 2.34 (1.43-3.82); interaction P = 0.008. HRs for CV death were for diabetes on no medication: 1.19 (0.86-166); for diabetes on non-insulin antidiabetic drugs: 1.12 (0.88-1.42); for insulin-treated diabetes 1.85 (1.36-2.53), interaction P = 0.001.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In anticoagulated patients with AF, a higher risk of MI and CV death is largely confined to diabetes treated with insulin.</p>","PeriodicalId":11995,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal — Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"227-235"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Heterogeneity of diabetes as a risk factor for major adverse cardiovascular events in anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation: an analysis of the ARISTOTLE trial.\",\"authors\":\"Raffaele De Caterina,&nbsp;Giuseppe Patti,&nbsp;Johan Westerbergh,&nbsp;John Horowitz,&nbsp;Justin A Ezekowitz,&nbsp;Basil S Lewis,&nbsp;Renato D Lopes,&nbsp;John J V McMurray,&nbsp;Dan Atar,&nbsp;M Cecilia Bahit,&nbsp;Matyas Keltai,&nbsp;José L López-Sendón,&nbsp;Witold Ruzyllo,&nbsp;Christopher B Granger,&nbsp;John H Alexander,&nbsp;Lars Wallentin\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaa140\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Whether diabetes without insulin therapy is an independent cardiovascular (CV) risk factor in atrial fibrillation (AF) has recently been questioned. We investigated the prognostic relevance of diabetes with or without insulin treatment in patients in the ARISTOTLE trial.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Patients with AF and increased stroke risk randomized to apixaban vs. warfarin were classified according to diabetes status: no diabetes; diabetes on no diabetes medications; diabetes on non-insulin antidiabetic drugs only; or insulin-treated. The associations between such patient subgroups and stroke/systemic embolism (SE), myocardial infarction (MI), and CV death were examined by Cox proportional hazard regression, both unadjusted and adjusted for other prognostic variables. Patients with diabetes were younger and had a higher body mass index. Median CHA2DS2VASc score was 4.0 in patients with diabetes and 3.0 in patients without diabetes. We found no significant difference in stroke/SE incidence across patient subgroups. Compared with no diabetes, only insulin-treated diabetes was significantly associated with higher risk. When adjusted for clinical variables, compared with no diabetes, the hazard ratios (HRs) for MI (95% confidence intervals) were for diabetes on no medication: 1.15 (0.62-2.14); for diabetes on non-insulin antidiabetic drugs: 1.32 (0.90-1.94); for insulin-treated diabetes: 2.34 (1.43-3.82); interaction P = 0.008. HRs for CV death were for diabetes on no medication: 1.19 (0.86-166); for diabetes on non-insulin antidiabetic drugs: 1.12 (0.88-1.42); for insulin-treated diabetes 1.85 (1.36-2.53), interaction P = 0.001.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In anticoagulated patients with AF, a higher risk of MI and CV death is largely confined to diabetes treated with insulin.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11995,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Heart Journal — Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"227-235\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Heart Journal — Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaa140\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal — Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaa140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

目的:糖尿病未胰岛素治疗是否是心房颤动(AF)的独立心血管(CV)危险因素最近受到质疑。我们在亚里士多德试验中研究了糖尿病患者接受或不接受胰岛素治疗的预后相关性。方法和结果:房颤和卒中风险增加的患者随机分为阿哌沙班和华法林两组,根据糖尿病状态进行分类:无糖尿病;糖尿病患者不服用糖尿病药物;仅用非胰岛素类降糖药治疗糖尿病;或来。这些患者亚组与卒中/全身性栓塞(SE)、心肌梗死(MI)和CV死亡之间的关联通过Cox比例风险回归进行了检验,未调整和调整了其他预后变量。糖尿病患者更年轻,身体质量指数更高。糖尿病患者CHA2DS2VASc评分中位数为4.0,非糖尿病患者为3.0。我们发现不同患者亚组间卒中/SE发生率无显著差异。与没有糖尿病的人相比,只有胰岛素治疗的糖尿病与更高的风险显著相关。经临床变量调整后,与无糖尿病患者相比,无药物治疗的糖尿病患者MI的风险比(95%置信区间)为1.15 (0.62-2.14);使用非胰岛素类降糖药的糖尿病患者:1.32 (0.90-1.94);胰岛素治疗糖尿病:2.34 (1.43-3.82);交互作用P = 0.008。未服药的糖尿病患者CV死亡hr为1.19 (0.86-166);非胰岛素类降糖药对糖尿病的影响:1.12 (0.88-1.42);胰岛素治疗糖尿病1.85(1.36-2.53),相互作用P = 0.001。结论:在抗凝治疗的房颤患者中,心肌梗死和心血管死亡的高风险主要局限于胰岛素治疗的糖尿病患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Heterogeneity of diabetes as a risk factor for major adverse cardiovascular events in anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation: an analysis of the ARISTOTLE trial.

Aims: Whether diabetes without insulin therapy is an independent cardiovascular (CV) risk factor in atrial fibrillation (AF) has recently been questioned. We investigated the prognostic relevance of diabetes with or without insulin treatment in patients in the ARISTOTLE trial.

Methods and results: Patients with AF and increased stroke risk randomized to apixaban vs. warfarin were classified according to diabetes status: no diabetes; diabetes on no diabetes medications; diabetes on non-insulin antidiabetic drugs only; or insulin-treated. The associations between such patient subgroups and stroke/systemic embolism (SE), myocardial infarction (MI), and CV death were examined by Cox proportional hazard regression, both unadjusted and adjusted for other prognostic variables. Patients with diabetes were younger and had a higher body mass index. Median CHA2DS2VASc score was 4.0 in patients with diabetes and 3.0 in patients without diabetes. We found no significant difference in stroke/SE incidence across patient subgroups. Compared with no diabetes, only insulin-treated diabetes was significantly associated with higher risk. When adjusted for clinical variables, compared with no diabetes, the hazard ratios (HRs) for MI (95% confidence intervals) were for diabetes on no medication: 1.15 (0.62-2.14); for diabetes on non-insulin antidiabetic drugs: 1.32 (0.90-1.94); for insulin-treated diabetes: 2.34 (1.43-3.82); interaction P = 0.008. HRs for CV death were for diabetes on no medication: 1.19 (0.86-166); for diabetes on non-insulin antidiabetic drugs: 1.12 (0.88-1.42); for insulin-treated diabetes 1.85 (1.36-2.53), interaction P = 0.001.

Conclusion: In anticoagulated patients with AF, a higher risk of MI and CV death is largely confined to diabetes treated with insulin.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信