关于特殊饮料、特殊饮料法律和酒精相关结果的系统综述。

3区 医学
Current Epidemiology Reports Pub Date : 2020-12-01 Epub Date: 2020-10-31 DOI:10.1007/s40471-020-00247-0
Victor Puac-Polanco, Katherine M Keyes, Pia M Mauro, Charles C Branas
{"title":"关于特殊饮料、特殊饮料法律和酒精相关结果的系统综述。","authors":"Victor Puac-Polanco,&nbsp;Katherine M Keyes,&nbsp;Pia M Mauro,&nbsp;Charles C Branas","doi":"10.1007/s40471-020-00247-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The adverse health and safety consequences of heavy alcohol consumption are a leading problem around the world. While many risk factors have been extensively studied and presented in comprehensive summaries, not all questions regarding risk factors for problematic drinking behaviors have been answered and presented in systematic reviews. As of March 2020, no review has summarized studies assessing the role of promotional price practices at on-premises alcohol outlets, known as drink specials. Also missing was systematic information of policies that regulated these promotional practices. We aimed to synthesize the available research evidence of the effects that drink specials and drink special laws have on different alcohol-related outcomes.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Twelve studies examined the effect of drink specials in seven countries between 1978 and 2018. Of these, 11 found a consistent positive association between drink specials and increased alcohol consumption, heavy drinking, and alcohol intoxication. Drink specials also increased reports of driving under the influence, fighting, and unprotected sex. Drink specials were also associated with expectations of higher consumption and modified attitudes and behaviors towards favorable views of drink specials. Effect sizes ranged from 1.80 to 4.43 increased odds for the examined alcohol-related outcomes. The only study examining the effects of a drink special law revealed mixed findings between prohibiting happy hours and three alcohol-related outcomes.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Drink specials were consistently associated with alcohol-related adverse outcomes, but almost nothing is known about the effects of laws restricting drink specials.</p>","PeriodicalId":48527,"journal":{"name":"Current Epidemiology Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s40471-020-00247-0","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Systematic Review of Drink Specials, Drink Special Laws, and Alcohol-Related Outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Victor Puac-Polanco,&nbsp;Katherine M Keyes,&nbsp;Pia M Mauro,&nbsp;Charles C Branas\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40471-020-00247-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The adverse health and safety consequences of heavy alcohol consumption are a leading problem around the world. While many risk factors have been extensively studied and presented in comprehensive summaries, not all questions regarding risk factors for problematic drinking behaviors have been answered and presented in systematic reviews. As of March 2020, no review has summarized studies assessing the role of promotional price practices at on-premises alcohol outlets, known as drink specials. Also missing was systematic information of policies that regulated these promotional practices. We aimed to synthesize the available research evidence of the effects that drink specials and drink special laws have on different alcohol-related outcomes.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Twelve studies examined the effect of drink specials in seven countries between 1978 and 2018. Of these, 11 found a consistent positive association between drink specials and increased alcohol consumption, heavy drinking, and alcohol intoxication. Drink specials also increased reports of driving under the influence, fighting, and unprotected sex. Drink specials were also associated with expectations of higher consumption and modified attitudes and behaviors towards favorable views of drink specials. Effect sizes ranged from 1.80 to 4.43 increased odds for the examined alcohol-related outcomes. The only study examining the effects of a drink special law revealed mixed findings between prohibiting happy hours and three alcohol-related outcomes.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Drink specials were consistently associated with alcohol-related adverse outcomes, but almost nothing is known about the effects of laws restricting drink specials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48527,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Epidemiology Reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s40471-020-00247-0\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Epidemiology Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40471-020-00247-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/10/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Epidemiology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40471-020-00247-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/10/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

审查目的:大量饮酒的不良健康和安全后果是世界各地的一个主要问题。虽然许多风险因素已被广泛研究并在综合摘要中提出,但并非所有关于问题饮酒行为风险因素的问题都已在系统综述中得到回答和提出。截至2020年3月,没有一篇综述总结了评估内部酒类销售点(即特价饮料)促销价格做法作用的研究。同样缺少的是管理这些促销活动的政策的系统信息。我们的目的是综合现有的研究证据,证明饮料特价和饮料特别法对不同的酒精相关结果的影响。最近的发现:从1978年到2018年,12项研究调查了7个国家的特价饮料的影响。在这些研究中,有11项研究发现,特价饮料与酒精消费量增加、酗酒和酒精中毒之间存在一致的正相关关系。饮酒特价也增加了酒后驾车、打架和无保护的性行为的报告。特价饮料还与更高消费的预期以及对特价饮料有利看法的态度和行为的改变有关。效应量从1.80到4.43不等,酒精相关的结果增加了几率。唯一一项调查饮酒特别法影响的研究揭示了禁止欢乐时光和三种与酒精有关的结果之间的复杂结果。总结:特价饮料一直与酒精相关的不良后果有关,但关于限制特价饮料的法律的影响几乎一无所知。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Systematic Review of Drink Specials, Drink Special Laws, and Alcohol-Related Outcomes.

Purpose of review: The adverse health and safety consequences of heavy alcohol consumption are a leading problem around the world. While many risk factors have been extensively studied and presented in comprehensive summaries, not all questions regarding risk factors for problematic drinking behaviors have been answered and presented in systematic reviews. As of March 2020, no review has summarized studies assessing the role of promotional price practices at on-premises alcohol outlets, known as drink specials. Also missing was systematic information of policies that regulated these promotional practices. We aimed to synthesize the available research evidence of the effects that drink specials and drink special laws have on different alcohol-related outcomes.

Recent findings: Twelve studies examined the effect of drink specials in seven countries between 1978 and 2018. Of these, 11 found a consistent positive association between drink specials and increased alcohol consumption, heavy drinking, and alcohol intoxication. Drink specials also increased reports of driving under the influence, fighting, and unprotected sex. Drink specials were also associated with expectations of higher consumption and modified attitudes and behaviors towards favorable views of drink specials. Effect sizes ranged from 1.80 to 4.43 increased odds for the examined alcohol-related outcomes. The only study examining the effects of a drink special law revealed mixed findings between prohibiting happy hours and three alcohol-related outcomes.

Summary: Drink specials were consistently associated with alcohol-related adverse outcomes, but almost nothing is known about the effects of laws restricting drink specials.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Epidemiology Reports
Current Epidemiology Reports OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信