过氧化氢和氯化十六烷基吡啶作为秘鲁一所私立牙科学校牙科单位水管细菌去污剂的评价。

Arnaldo Munive-Degregori, Frank Mayta-Tovalino, Walter Gallo, Silvia Luza, Franco Mauricio, Saul Ilizarbe, Arnaldo Munive-Méndez
{"title":"过氧化氢和氯化十六烷基吡啶作为秘鲁一所私立牙科学校牙科单位水管细菌去污剂的评价。","authors":"Arnaldo Munive-Degregori,&nbsp;Frank Mayta-Tovalino,&nbsp;Walter Gallo,&nbsp;Silvia Luza,&nbsp;Franco Mauricio,&nbsp;Saul Ilizarbe,&nbsp;Arnaldo Munive-Méndez","doi":"10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_265_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the hydrogen peroxide and cetylpyridinium chloride as bacterial decontaminants of dental unit water lines at a private Peruvian dental school.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Water samples were obtained from 66 dental units of a University Dental Clinic before decontamination treatment and at days 3 and 7 thereafter. The biofilm treatments were applied equitably among the two treatment groups (<i>n</i> = 22) and one negative control (distilled water). The samples obtained on each collection day were taken to the biochemical laboratory in thermal boxes and then diluted, seeded, and incubated at 37°C for 24h to count colony forming units per milliliter (CFU/mL).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The samples to which hydrogen peroxide were applied had a mean of 1.53 × 10<sup>5</sup> CFU/mL before application, 0.04 × 10<sup>5</sup> CFU/mL at day 3, and 0.03 × 10<sup>5</sup> CFU/mL at day 7, whereas the samples undergoing cetylpyridinium chloride treatment had a mean of 1.74 × 10<sup>5</sup> CFU/mL before application, 615.38 CFU/mL on day 3, and 307.69 CFU/mL on day 7. Distilled water treatment showed a mean of 1.72 × 10<sup>5</sup> ± 0.39 × 10<sup>5</sup> CFU/mL at baseline, 1.51 × 10<sup>5</sup> ± 1.40 × 10<sup>5</sup> CFU/mL at day 3, and a mean of 1.74 × 10<sup>5</sup> ± 0.47 × 10<sup>5</sup> CFU/mL at day 7. Statistically significant differences were found among the three treatment groups at days 3 (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.001) and 7 (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.001) but not at baseline (<i>P</i> = 0.306).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The antibacterial effect of cetylpyridinium chloride was significantly greater than that of hydrogen peroxide and distilled water, and can, therefore, be used for bacterial control in the water lines of dental units.</p>","PeriodicalId":520674,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":"731-735"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f5/98/JISPCD-10-731.PMC7791582.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Hydrogen Peroxide and Cetylpyridinium Chloride as Bacterial Decontaminants of Dental Unit Water Lines at a Private Peruvian Dental School.\",\"authors\":\"Arnaldo Munive-Degregori,&nbsp;Frank Mayta-Tovalino,&nbsp;Walter Gallo,&nbsp;Silvia Luza,&nbsp;Franco Mauricio,&nbsp;Saul Ilizarbe,&nbsp;Arnaldo Munive-Méndez\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_265_20\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the hydrogen peroxide and cetylpyridinium chloride as bacterial decontaminants of dental unit water lines at a private Peruvian dental school.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Water samples were obtained from 66 dental units of a University Dental Clinic before decontamination treatment and at days 3 and 7 thereafter. The biofilm treatments were applied equitably among the two treatment groups (<i>n</i> = 22) and one negative control (distilled water). The samples obtained on each collection day were taken to the biochemical laboratory in thermal boxes and then diluted, seeded, and incubated at 37°C for 24h to count colony forming units per milliliter (CFU/mL).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The samples to which hydrogen peroxide were applied had a mean of 1.53 × 10<sup>5</sup> CFU/mL before application, 0.04 × 10<sup>5</sup> CFU/mL at day 3, and 0.03 × 10<sup>5</sup> CFU/mL at day 7, whereas the samples undergoing cetylpyridinium chloride treatment had a mean of 1.74 × 10<sup>5</sup> CFU/mL before application, 615.38 CFU/mL on day 3, and 307.69 CFU/mL on day 7. Distilled water treatment showed a mean of 1.72 × 10<sup>5</sup> ± 0.39 × 10<sup>5</sup> CFU/mL at baseline, 1.51 × 10<sup>5</sup> ± 1.40 × 10<sup>5</sup> CFU/mL at day 3, and a mean of 1.74 × 10<sup>5</sup> ± 0.47 × 10<sup>5</sup> CFU/mL at day 7. Statistically significant differences were found among the three treatment groups at days 3 (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.001) and 7 (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.001) but not at baseline (<i>P</i> = 0.306).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The antibacterial effect of cetylpyridinium chloride was significantly greater than that of hydrogen peroxide and distilled water, and can, therefore, be used for bacterial control in the water lines of dental units.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520674,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"731-735\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f5/98/JISPCD-10-731.PMC7791582.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_265_20\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/11/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_265_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是评估过氧化氢和十六烷基吡啶氯化作为细菌去污剂在一所秘鲁私立牙科学校的牙科单位水管。材料和方法:从某大学牙科诊所66个牙科单元取水样,分别在去污处理前和处理后的第3天和第7天。生物膜处理在两个处理组(n = 22)和一个阴性对照(蒸馏水)中均匀应用。每个采集日获得的样品放入热箱中送到生化实验室,稀释后播种,37℃孵育24h,计数每毫升菌落形成单位(CFU/mL)。结果:过氧化氢处理的样品在使用前平均为1.53 × 105 CFU/mL,第3天为0.04 × 105 CFU/mL,第7天为0.03 × 105 CFU/mL,而氯化16基吡啶处理的样品在使用前平均为1.74 × 105 CFU/mL,第3天为615.38 CFU/mL,第7天为307.69 CFU/mL。蒸馏水处理的基线平均值为1.72 × 105±0.39 × 105 CFU/mL,第3天平均值为1.51 × 105±1.40 × 105 CFU/mL,第7天平均值为1.74 × 105±0.47 × 105 CFU/mL。三个治疗组在第3天(P≤0.001)和第7天(P≤0.001)差异有统计学意义,但在基线时差异无统计学意义(P = 0.306)。结论:氯化十六烷基吡啶的抑菌效果明显大于双氧水和蒸馏水,可用于牙科单位供水管道的细菌控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Hydrogen Peroxide and Cetylpyridinium Chloride as Bacterial Decontaminants of Dental Unit Water Lines at a Private Peruvian Dental School.

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the hydrogen peroxide and cetylpyridinium chloride as bacterial decontaminants of dental unit water lines at a private Peruvian dental school.

Materials and methods: Water samples were obtained from 66 dental units of a University Dental Clinic before decontamination treatment and at days 3 and 7 thereafter. The biofilm treatments were applied equitably among the two treatment groups (n = 22) and one negative control (distilled water). The samples obtained on each collection day were taken to the biochemical laboratory in thermal boxes and then diluted, seeded, and incubated at 37°C for 24h to count colony forming units per milliliter (CFU/mL).

Results: The samples to which hydrogen peroxide were applied had a mean of 1.53 × 105 CFU/mL before application, 0.04 × 105 CFU/mL at day 3, and 0.03 × 105 CFU/mL at day 7, whereas the samples undergoing cetylpyridinium chloride treatment had a mean of 1.74 × 105 CFU/mL before application, 615.38 CFU/mL on day 3, and 307.69 CFU/mL on day 7. Distilled water treatment showed a mean of 1.72 × 105 ± 0.39 × 105 CFU/mL at baseline, 1.51 × 105 ± 1.40 × 105 CFU/mL at day 3, and a mean of 1.74 × 105 ± 0.47 × 105 CFU/mL at day 7. Statistically significant differences were found among the three treatment groups at days 3 (P ≤ 0.001) and 7 (P ≤ 0.001) but not at baseline (P = 0.306).

Conclusions: The antibacterial effect of cetylpyridinium chloride was significantly greater than that of hydrogen peroxide and distilled water, and can, therefore, be used for bacterial control in the water lines of dental units.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信