成熟拉丁裔和非专业健康教育者(促进者)的捐赠者指定:一项混合方法研究。

Elisa J Gordon, Heather Gardiner, Laura A Siminoff, Patrick J Kelly, Chidera Agu, Megan Urbanski, Gerard P Alolod, Amanda Benitez, Ilda Hernandez, Nancy Guinansaca, Lori Ramos Winther, Caroline D Bergeron, Rachel Kim, Antonette Montalvo, Tony Gonzalez
{"title":"成熟拉丁裔和非专业健康教育者(促进者)的捐赠者指定:一项混合方法研究。","authors":"Elisa J Gordon,&nbsp;Heather Gardiner,&nbsp;Laura A Siminoff,&nbsp;Patrick J Kelly,&nbsp;Chidera Agu,&nbsp;Megan Urbanski,&nbsp;Gerard P Alolod,&nbsp;Amanda Benitez,&nbsp;Ilda Hernandez,&nbsp;Nancy Guinansaca,&nbsp;Lori Ramos Winther,&nbsp;Caroline D Bergeron,&nbsp;Rachel Kim,&nbsp;Antonette Montalvo,&nbsp;Tony Gonzalez","doi":"10.1177/1090198120976351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite positive public attitudes toward solid organ donation in the United States, some of the lowest rates of donor designation persist among older adults and Latinx populations.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To identify barriers and facilitators to organ donation and donor designation among lay health educators (<i>promotoras</i>) and mature Latina (50+ years).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An explanatory sequential mixed-method design was employed, with telephone surveys followed by focus group interviews, to assess and understand the nuances of organ donation and donor designation knowledge, attitudes, and practices among promotoras and mature Latinas in Chicago (IL), Philadelphia (PA), and San Antonio (TX). Descriptive statistics summarized quantitative survey data; thematic content analysis was performed on qualitative data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-nine promotoras and 45 mature Latina participated in both the surveys and focus groups (<i>N</i> = 74). Most participants (90%) had limited knowledge of organ donation but reported being \"somewhat\" or \"strongly\" in favor of donation (70%); 40.5% were registered donors. Participants lacked knowledge about the registration process and its legal standing and upheld concerns that registered donors would be vulnerable to organ traffickers or targets for murder. Themes emerging from the group interviews revealed additional barriers to designation including distrust of the medical establishment, perceptions of inequities in organ allocation, and family resistance to discussing death.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Low donor designation rates are primarily driven by concerns about organ trafficking and the fairness of the allocation system, particularly for undocumented immigrants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results informed development of a culturally targeted educational and communication skills intervention to increase donor designation in Latinx communities.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04007419.</p>","PeriodicalId":520637,"journal":{"name":"Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education","volume":" ","pages":"805-817"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1090198120976351","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Donor Designation Among Mature Latinas and Lay Health Educators (<i>Promotoras</i>): A Mixed-Methods Study.\",\"authors\":\"Elisa J Gordon,&nbsp;Heather Gardiner,&nbsp;Laura A Siminoff,&nbsp;Patrick J Kelly,&nbsp;Chidera Agu,&nbsp;Megan Urbanski,&nbsp;Gerard P Alolod,&nbsp;Amanda Benitez,&nbsp;Ilda Hernandez,&nbsp;Nancy Guinansaca,&nbsp;Lori Ramos Winther,&nbsp;Caroline D Bergeron,&nbsp;Rachel Kim,&nbsp;Antonette Montalvo,&nbsp;Tony Gonzalez\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1090198120976351\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite positive public attitudes toward solid organ donation in the United States, some of the lowest rates of donor designation persist among older adults and Latinx populations.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To identify barriers and facilitators to organ donation and donor designation among lay health educators (<i>promotoras</i>) and mature Latina (50+ years).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An explanatory sequential mixed-method design was employed, with telephone surveys followed by focus group interviews, to assess and understand the nuances of organ donation and donor designation knowledge, attitudes, and practices among promotoras and mature Latinas in Chicago (IL), Philadelphia (PA), and San Antonio (TX). Descriptive statistics summarized quantitative survey data; thematic content analysis was performed on qualitative data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-nine promotoras and 45 mature Latina participated in both the surveys and focus groups (<i>N</i> = 74). Most participants (90%) had limited knowledge of organ donation but reported being \\\"somewhat\\\" or \\\"strongly\\\" in favor of donation (70%); 40.5% were registered donors. Participants lacked knowledge about the registration process and its legal standing and upheld concerns that registered donors would be vulnerable to organ traffickers or targets for murder. Themes emerging from the group interviews revealed additional barriers to designation including distrust of the medical establishment, perceptions of inequities in organ allocation, and family resistance to discussing death.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Low donor designation rates are primarily driven by concerns about organ trafficking and the fairness of the allocation system, particularly for undocumented immigrants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results informed development of a culturally targeted educational and communication skills intervention to increase donor designation in Latinx communities.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04007419.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520637,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"805-817\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1090198120976351\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198120976351\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/12/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198120976351","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/12/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:尽管美国公众对实体器官捐赠持积极态度,但在老年人和拉丁裔人群中,一些最低的捐赠者指定率仍然存在。目的:确定非专业健康教育者(促进者)和成熟拉丁裔(50岁以上)器官捐赠和指定捐赠者的障碍和促进因素。方法:采用解释性顺序混合方法设计,通过电话调查和焦点小组访谈,评估和了解芝加哥(IL)、费城(PA)和圣安东尼奥(TX)的促进者和成熟拉丁裔人在器官捐赠和捐赠者指定知识、态度和实践方面的细微差别。描述性统计对定量调查数据进行汇总;对定性数据进行专题内容分析。结果:29名促销员和45名拉丁裔成年人同时参与了调查和焦点小组(N = 74)。大多数参与者(90%)对器官捐赠的了解有限,但报告“有些”或“强烈”支持捐赠(70%);40.5%是注册捐赠者。与会者缺乏对登记程序及其法律地位的了解,并对登记的捐献者容易成为器官贩运者或谋杀目标表示关切。从小组访谈中出现的主题揭示了指定的其他障碍,包括对医疗机构的不信任,对器官分配不公平的看法,以及家庭对讨论死亡的抵制。讨论:低捐赠者指定率主要是由于对器官贩运和分配制度的公平性的担忧,特别是对无证移民。结论:研究结果为制定有文化针对性的教育和沟通技巧干预措施提供了信息,以增加拉丁裔社区的捐助者指定。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04007419。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Donor Designation Among Mature Latinas and Lay Health Educators (Promotoras): A Mixed-Methods Study.

Background: Despite positive public attitudes toward solid organ donation in the United States, some of the lowest rates of donor designation persist among older adults and Latinx populations.

Aims: To identify barriers and facilitators to organ donation and donor designation among lay health educators (promotoras) and mature Latina (50+ years).

Methods: An explanatory sequential mixed-method design was employed, with telephone surveys followed by focus group interviews, to assess and understand the nuances of organ donation and donor designation knowledge, attitudes, and practices among promotoras and mature Latinas in Chicago (IL), Philadelphia (PA), and San Antonio (TX). Descriptive statistics summarized quantitative survey data; thematic content analysis was performed on qualitative data.

Results: Twenty-nine promotoras and 45 mature Latina participated in both the surveys and focus groups (N = 74). Most participants (90%) had limited knowledge of organ donation but reported being "somewhat" or "strongly" in favor of donation (70%); 40.5% were registered donors. Participants lacked knowledge about the registration process and its legal standing and upheld concerns that registered donors would be vulnerable to organ traffickers or targets for murder. Themes emerging from the group interviews revealed additional barriers to designation including distrust of the medical establishment, perceptions of inequities in organ allocation, and family resistance to discussing death.

Discussion: Low donor designation rates are primarily driven by concerns about organ trafficking and the fairness of the allocation system, particularly for undocumented immigrants.

Conclusions: The results informed development of a culturally targeted educational and communication skills intervention to increase donor designation in Latinx communities.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04007419.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信