在 RCA 中采用人为因素方法2 :工具、流程和战略。

Q3 Medicine
Douglas A Wiegmann, Laura J Wood, Demetrius B Solomon, Scott A Shappell
{"title":"在 RCA 中采用人为因素方法2 :工具、流程和战略。","authors":"Douglas A Wiegmann, Laura J Wood, Demetrius B Solomon, Scott A Shappell","doi":"10.1002/jhrm.21454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Root Cause Analysis and Action (RCA<sup>2</sup> ) guidelines offer fundamental improvements to traditional RCA. Yet, these guidelines lack robust methods to support a human factors analysis of patient harm events and development of systems-level interventions. We recently integrated a complement of human factors tools into the RCA<sup>2</sup> process to address this gap. These tools include the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS), the Human Factors Intervention Matrix (HFIX), and a multiple-criterion decision tool called FACES, for selecting effective HFIX solutions. We describe each of these tools and illustrate how they can be integrated into RCA<sup>2</sup> to create a robust human factors RCA process called HFACS-RCA<sup>2</sup> . We also present qualitative results from an 18-month implementation study within a large academic health center. Results demonstrate how HFACS-RCA<sup>2</sup> can foster a more comprehensive, human factors analysis of serious patient harm events and the identification of broader system interventions. Following HFACS-RCA<sup>2</sup> implementation, RCA team members (risk managers and quality improvement advisors) also experienced greater satisfaction in their work, leadership gained more trust in RCA findings and recommendations, and the transparency of the RCA process increased. Effective strategies for overcoming implementation barriers, including changes in roles, responsibilities and workload will also be presented.</p>","PeriodicalId":39819,"journal":{"name":"Journal of healthcare risk management : the journal of the American Society for Healthcare Risk Management","volume":"41 1","pages":"31-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8213862/pdf/nihms-1647261.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementing a human factors approach to RCA<sup>2</sup> : Tools, processes and strategies.\",\"authors\":\"Douglas A Wiegmann, Laura J Wood, Demetrius B Solomon, Scott A Shappell\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jhrm.21454\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Root Cause Analysis and Action (RCA<sup>2</sup> ) guidelines offer fundamental improvements to traditional RCA. Yet, these guidelines lack robust methods to support a human factors analysis of patient harm events and development of systems-level interventions. We recently integrated a complement of human factors tools into the RCA<sup>2</sup> process to address this gap. These tools include the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS), the Human Factors Intervention Matrix (HFIX), and a multiple-criterion decision tool called FACES, for selecting effective HFIX solutions. We describe each of these tools and illustrate how they can be integrated into RCA<sup>2</sup> to create a robust human factors RCA process called HFACS-RCA<sup>2</sup> . We also present qualitative results from an 18-month implementation study within a large academic health center. Results demonstrate how HFACS-RCA<sup>2</sup> can foster a more comprehensive, human factors analysis of serious patient harm events and the identification of broader system interventions. Following HFACS-RCA<sup>2</sup> implementation, RCA team members (risk managers and quality improvement advisors) also experienced greater satisfaction in their work, leadership gained more trust in RCA findings and recommendations, and the transparency of the RCA process increased. Effective strategies for overcoming implementation barriers, including changes in roles, responsibilities and workload will also be presented.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39819,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of healthcare risk management : the journal of the American Society for Healthcare Risk Management\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"31-46\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8213862/pdf/nihms-1647261.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of healthcare risk management : the journal of the American Society for Healthcare Risk Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jhrm.21454\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/12/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of healthcare risk management : the journal of the American Society for Healthcare Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jhrm.21454","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/12/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根源分析和行动(RCA2 )指南对传统的 RCA 进行了根本性的改进。然而,这些指南缺乏有力的方法来支持对患者伤害事件进行人为因素分析并制定系统级干预措施。我们最近在 RCA2 流程中整合了一系列人为因素工具,以弥补这一不足。这些工具包括人因分析和分类系统 (HFACS)、人因干预矩阵 (HFIX) 以及名为 FACES 的多重标准决策工具,用于选择有效的 HFIX 解决方案。我们将逐一介绍这些工具,并说明如何将它们集成到 RCA2 中,以创建一个名为 HFACS-RCA2 的强大的人为因素 RCA 流程。我们还介绍了一个大型学术健康中心为期 18 个月的实施研究的定性结果。研究结果表明,HFACS-RCA2 可以促进对严重伤害患者事件进行更全面的人为因素分析,并确定更广泛的系统干预措施。在实施 HFACS-RCA2 后,RCA 团队成员(风险经理和质量改进顾问)对其工作也有了更大的满意度,领导层对 RCA 的结论和建议也更加信任,RCA 流程的透明度也有所提高。此外,还将介绍克服实施障碍的有效策略,包括角色、职责和工作量的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementing a human factors approach to RCA2 : Tools, processes and strategies.

Root Cause Analysis and Action (RCA2 ) guidelines offer fundamental improvements to traditional RCA. Yet, these guidelines lack robust methods to support a human factors analysis of patient harm events and development of systems-level interventions. We recently integrated a complement of human factors tools into the RCA2 process to address this gap. These tools include the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS), the Human Factors Intervention Matrix (HFIX), and a multiple-criterion decision tool called FACES, for selecting effective HFIX solutions. We describe each of these tools and illustrate how they can be integrated into RCA2 to create a robust human factors RCA process called HFACS-RCA2 . We also present qualitative results from an 18-month implementation study within a large academic health center. Results demonstrate how HFACS-RCA2 can foster a more comprehensive, human factors analysis of serious patient harm events and the identification of broader system interventions. Following HFACS-RCA2 implementation, RCA team members (risk managers and quality improvement advisors) also experienced greater satisfaction in their work, leadership gained more trust in RCA findings and recommendations, and the transparency of the RCA process increased. Effective strategies for overcoming implementation barriers, including changes in roles, responsibilities and workload will also be presented.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: The Journal of Healthcare Risk Management is published quarterly by the American Society for Healthcare Risk Management (ASHRM). The purpose of the journal is to publish research, trends, and new developments in the field of healthcare risk management with the ultimate goal of advancing safe and trusted patient-centered healthcare delivery and promoting proactive and innovative management of organization-wide risk. The journal focuses on insightful, peer-reviewed content that relates to patient safety, emergency preparedness, insurance, legal, leadership, and other timely healthcare risk management issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信