Douglas A Wiegmann, Laura J Wood, Demetrius B Solomon, Scott A Shappell
{"title":"在 RCA 中采用人为因素方法2 :工具、流程和战略。","authors":"Douglas A Wiegmann, Laura J Wood, Demetrius B Solomon, Scott A Shappell","doi":"10.1002/jhrm.21454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Root Cause Analysis and Action (RCA<sup>2</sup> ) guidelines offer fundamental improvements to traditional RCA. Yet, these guidelines lack robust methods to support a human factors analysis of patient harm events and development of systems-level interventions. We recently integrated a complement of human factors tools into the RCA<sup>2</sup> process to address this gap. These tools include the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS), the Human Factors Intervention Matrix (HFIX), and a multiple-criterion decision tool called FACES, for selecting effective HFIX solutions. We describe each of these tools and illustrate how they can be integrated into RCA<sup>2</sup> to create a robust human factors RCA process called HFACS-RCA<sup>2</sup> . We also present qualitative results from an 18-month implementation study within a large academic health center. Results demonstrate how HFACS-RCA<sup>2</sup> can foster a more comprehensive, human factors analysis of serious patient harm events and the identification of broader system interventions. Following HFACS-RCA<sup>2</sup> implementation, RCA team members (risk managers and quality improvement advisors) also experienced greater satisfaction in their work, leadership gained more trust in RCA findings and recommendations, and the transparency of the RCA process increased. Effective strategies for overcoming implementation barriers, including changes in roles, responsibilities and workload will also be presented.</p>","PeriodicalId":39819,"journal":{"name":"Journal of healthcare risk management : the journal of the American Society for Healthcare Risk Management","volume":"41 1","pages":"31-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8213862/pdf/nihms-1647261.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementing a human factors approach to RCA<sup>2</sup> : Tools, processes and strategies.\",\"authors\":\"Douglas A Wiegmann, Laura J Wood, Demetrius B Solomon, Scott A Shappell\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jhrm.21454\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Root Cause Analysis and Action (RCA<sup>2</sup> ) guidelines offer fundamental improvements to traditional RCA. Yet, these guidelines lack robust methods to support a human factors analysis of patient harm events and development of systems-level interventions. We recently integrated a complement of human factors tools into the RCA<sup>2</sup> process to address this gap. These tools include the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS), the Human Factors Intervention Matrix (HFIX), and a multiple-criterion decision tool called FACES, for selecting effective HFIX solutions. We describe each of these tools and illustrate how they can be integrated into RCA<sup>2</sup> to create a robust human factors RCA process called HFACS-RCA<sup>2</sup> . We also present qualitative results from an 18-month implementation study within a large academic health center. Results demonstrate how HFACS-RCA<sup>2</sup> can foster a more comprehensive, human factors analysis of serious patient harm events and the identification of broader system interventions. Following HFACS-RCA<sup>2</sup> implementation, RCA team members (risk managers and quality improvement advisors) also experienced greater satisfaction in their work, leadership gained more trust in RCA findings and recommendations, and the transparency of the RCA process increased. Effective strategies for overcoming implementation barriers, including changes in roles, responsibilities and workload will also be presented.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39819,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of healthcare risk management : the journal of the American Society for Healthcare Risk Management\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"31-46\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8213862/pdf/nihms-1647261.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of healthcare risk management : the journal of the American Society for Healthcare Risk Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jhrm.21454\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/12/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of healthcare risk management : the journal of the American Society for Healthcare Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jhrm.21454","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/12/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Implementing a human factors approach to RCA2 : Tools, processes and strategies.
Root Cause Analysis and Action (RCA2 ) guidelines offer fundamental improvements to traditional RCA. Yet, these guidelines lack robust methods to support a human factors analysis of patient harm events and development of systems-level interventions. We recently integrated a complement of human factors tools into the RCA2 process to address this gap. These tools include the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS), the Human Factors Intervention Matrix (HFIX), and a multiple-criterion decision tool called FACES, for selecting effective HFIX solutions. We describe each of these tools and illustrate how they can be integrated into RCA2 to create a robust human factors RCA process called HFACS-RCA2 . We also present qualitative results from an 18-month implementation study within a large academic health center. Results demonstrate how HFACS-RCA2 can foster a more comprehensive, human factors analysis of serious patient harm events and the identification of broader system interventions. Following HFACS-RCA2 implementation, RCA team members (risk managers and quality improvement advisors) also experienced greater satisfaction in their work, leadership gained more trust in RCA findings and recommendations, and the transparency of the RCA process increased. Effective strategies for overcoming implementation barriers, including changes in roles, responsibilities and workload will also be presented.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Healthcare Risk Management is published quarterly by the American Society for Healthcare Risk Management (ASHRM). The purpose of the journal is to publish research, trends, and new developments in the field of healthcare risk management with the ultimate goal of advancing safe and trusted patient-centered healthcare delivery and promoting proactive and innovative management of organization-wide risk. The journal focuses on insightful, peer-reviewed content that relates to patient safety, emergency preparedness, insurance, legal, leadership, and other timely healthcare risk management issues.