性别间盆腔形状变化是DDH过度诊断的原因。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management Pub Date : 2020-11-10 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.2147/TCRM.S265038
Khalid M Abdalla, Mostafa A Abdelrahman, Abdelwahab J Aleshawi, Alaha S Al Taweel, Majid Bani-Ata, Khaled Obeidat
{"title":"性别间盆腔形状变化是DDH过度诊断的原因。","authors":"Khalid M Abdalla,&nbsp;Mostafa A Abdelrahman,&nbsp;Abdelwahab J Aleshawi,&nbsp;Alaha S Al Taweel,&nbsp;Majid Bani-Ata,&nbsp;Khaled Obeidat","doi":"10.2147/TCRM.S265038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is an abnormal relationship between the acetabulum and the head of the femur. Plain x-ray of both hips at the age of 3 months is still in use in some countries. On plain films, classic lines and angles are evaluated to meet current guidelines for positive DDH. Among these is the acetabular angle (AA), which most did not exceed 30° in normal pelvis regardless of gender. A flat promontory gives the impression of a high AA angle, whereas a sharp promontory gives the impression of a low AA angle.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>All anteroposterior (AP) pelvic digital x-ray studies performed to rule out DDH were collected from the PACS systems. A novel angle was measured between a line parallel to the lateral aspect of the region of the inferior iliac spines and a line that extends along the acetabular roof to quantify the roundness of the iliac promontory. We called the former line the Miral line and the formed angle the iliac promontory angle.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We show that the promontory shape is significantly different between genders, and therefore it is mistaken to generalize an upper AA limit for males and females. In addition, we show that the current guideline of the upper limit of AA did not predict the incidence of DDH.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We suggest that the current practice is introducing a high rate of false positive, especially among females, and the current guidelines on AA should be reviewed and assigned separately for males and females. This is more important for countries that did not utilize the ultrasonographic assessment for DDH.</p>","PeriodicalId":48769,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management","volume":"16 ","pages":"1075-1080"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/TCRM.S265038","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inter-Gender Pelvic Shape Variations as a Cause of DDH Overdiagnosis.\",\"authors\":\"Khalid M Abdalla,&nbsp;Mostafa A Abdelrahman,&nbsp;Abdelwahab J Aleshawi,&nbsp;Alaha S Al Taweel,&nbsp;Majid Bani-Ata,&nbsp;Khaled Obeidat\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/TCRM.S265038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is an abnormal relationship between the acetabulum and the head of the femur. Plain x-ray of both hips at the age of 3 months is still in use in some countries. On plain films, classic lines and angles are evaluated to meet current guidelines for positive DDH. Among these is the acetabular angle (AA), which most did not exceed 30° in normal pelvis regardless of gender. A flat promontory gives the impression of a high AA angle, whereas a sharp promontory gives the impression of a low AA angle.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>All anteroposterior (AP) pelvic digital x-ray studies performed to rule out DDH were collected from the PACS systems. A novel angle was measured between a line parallel to the lateral aspect of the region of the inferior iliac spines and a line that extends along the acetabular roof to quantify the roundness of the iliac promontory. We called the former line the Miral line and the formed angle the iliac promontory angle.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We show that the promontory shape is significantly different between genders, and therefore it is mistaken to generalize an upper AA limit for males and females. In addition, we show that the current guideline of the upper limit of AA did not predict the incidence of DDH.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We suggest that the current practice is introducing a high rate of false positive, especially among females, and the current guidelines on AA should be reviewed and assigned separately for males and females. This is more important for countries that did not utilize the ultrasonographic assessment for DDH.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48769,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"1075-1080\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/TCRM.S265038\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S265038\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S265038","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:髋发育不良(DDH)是髋臼与股骨头之间的一种异常关系。一些国家仍在使用3个月大时的双髋x线平片。在平片上,评估经典的线和角度,以满足当前DDH阳性的指导方针。其中包括髋臼角(AA),无论性别,正常骨盆的髋臼角多数不超过30°。平坦的海岬给人的印象是高AA角,而尖锐的海岬给人的印象是低AA角。材料和方法:所有用于排除DDH的骨盆正位(AP)数字x线研究均收集自PACS系统。在一条平行于髂下棘区域外侧的线和一条沿髋臼顶延伸的线之间测量了一个新的角度,以量化髂角的圆度。我们称前一条线为米拉尔线,形成的角为髂海岬角。结果:我们发现海角的形状在性别之间存在显著差异,因此将AA上限概括为男性和女性是错误的。此外,我们发现目前的AA上限指南并不能预测DDH的发生。结论:我们认为目前的做法导致假阳性率很高,特别是在女性中,目前的AA指南应进行审查,并将男性和女性分开分配。这对于没有利用超声检查诊断DDH的国家来说更为重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Inter-Gender Pelvic Shape Variations as a Cause of DDH Overdiagnosis.

Inter-Gender Pelvic Shape Variations as a Cause of DDH Overdiagnosis.

Inter-Gender Pelvic Shape Variations as a Cause of DDH Overdiagnosis.

Inter-Gender Pelvic Shape Variations as a Cause of DDH Overdiagnosis.

Objective: Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is an abnormal relationship between the acetabulum and the head of the femur. Plain x-ray of both hips at the age of 3 months is still in use in some countries. On plain films, classic lines and angles are evaluated to meet current guidelines for positive DDH. Among these is the acetabular angle (AA), which most did not exceed 30° in normal pelvis regardless of gender. A flat promontory gives the impression of a high AA angle, whereas a sharp promontory gives the impression of a low AA angle.

Materials and methods: All anteroposterior (AP) pelvic digital x-ray studies performed to rule out DDH were collected from the PACS systems. A novel angle was measured between a line parallel to the lateral aspect of the region of the inferior iliac spines and a line that extends along the acetabular roof to quantify the roundness of the iliac promontory. We called the former line the Miral line and the formed angle the iliac promontory angle.

Results: We show that the promontory shape is significantly different between genders, and therefore it is mistaken to generalize an upper AA limit for males and females. In addition, we show that the current guideline of the upper limit of AA did not predict the incidence of DDH.

Conclusion: We suggest that the current practice is introducing a high rate of false positive, especially among females, and the current guidelines on AA should be reviewed and assigned separately for males and females. This is more important for countries that did not utilize the ultrasonographic assessment for DDH.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.60%
发文量
139
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management is an international, peer-reviewed journal of clinical therapeutics and risk management, focusing on concise rapid reporting of clinical studies in all therapeutic areas, outcomes, safety, and programs for the effective, safe, and sustained use of medicines, therapeutic and surgical interventions in all clinical areas. The journal welcomes submissions covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary. The journal will consider case reports but only if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. As of 18th March 2019, Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信