儿童神经心理服务的结果:一项系统综述。

The Clinical neuropsychologist Pub Date : 2022-08-01 Epub Date: 2020-12-13 DOI:10.1080/13854046.2020.1853812
Evelyn L Fisher, Eric Zimak, Andrea R Sherwood, John Elias
{"title":"儿童神经心理服务的结果:一项系统综述。","authors":"Evelyn L Fisher, Eric Zimak, Andrea R Sherwood, John Elias","doi":"10.1080/13854046.2020.1853812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> The primary aim of this project was to apply systematic review methods to synthesize the literature on outcomes of pediatric neuropsychological services. The secondary aim was to use the results of the systematic review to identify gaps in the extant literature and describe priorities for future research. <b>Method:</b> We identified the relevant studies using a rigorous search strategy, collected data on methodological variables, assessed the risk of bias in the studies, summarized findings by topic and subtopic areas, identified strengths and weaknesses of the literature, and provided recommendations for future research. The outcomes measured were satisfaction, changes in resource or strategy utilization, and changes in symptoms or functioning (i.e. changes in child emotional, behavioral, cognitive, or academic problems, parent stress, or family functioning). <b>Results:</b> The final sources of data were 26 records, pertaining to a total of 974 children who received neuropsychological services. Parents were generally satisfied with services and reported high clinician empathy and increased level of knowledge, based on the evaluation. However, they reported less often that the neuropsychologist provided actual help. Informal home and school-based strategies were implemented more often than other types of recommendations. The research on changes in child symptoms and functioning was limited, but suggests improvements. <b>Conclusions:</b> This is the first systematic review of outcomes of pediatric neuropsychological services. Larger studies involving data collection at multiple time points are needed in order to further clarify mechanisms leading to outcomes and potential targets for improving them.</p>","PeriodicalId":197334,"journal":{"name":"The Clinical neuropsychologist","volume":" ","pages":"1265-1289"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of pediatric neuropsychological services: A systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Evelyn L Fisher, Eric Zimak, Andrea R Sherwood, John Elias\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13854046.2020.1853812\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> The primary aim of this project was to apply systematic review methods to synthesize the literature on outcomes of pediatric neuropsychological services. The secondary aim was to use the results of the systematic review to identify gaps in the extant literature and describe priorities for future research. <b>Method:</b> We identified the relevant studies using a rigorous search strategy, collected data on methodological variables, assessed the risk of bias in the studies, summarized findings by topic and subtopic areas, identified strengths and weaknesses of the literature, and provided recommendations for future research. The outcomes measured were satisfaction, changes in resource or strategy utilization, and changes in symptoms or functioning (i.e. changes in child emotional, behavioral, cognitive, or academic problems, parent stress, or family functioning). <b>Results:</b> The final sources of data were 26 records, pertaining to a total of 974 children who received neuropsychological services. Parents were generally satisfied with services and reported high clinician empathy and increased level of knowledge, based on the evaluation. However, they reported less often that the neuropsychologist provided actual help. Informal home and school-based strategies were implemented more often than other types of recommendations. The research on changes in child symptoms and functioning was limited, but suggests improvements. <b>Conclusions:</b> This is the first systematic review of outcomes of pediatric neuropsychological services. Larger studies involving data collection at multiple time points are needed in order to further clarify mechanisms leading to outcomes and potential targets for improving them.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":197334,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Clinical neuropsychologist\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1265-1289\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Clinical neuropsychologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2020.1853812\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/12/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Clinical neuropsychologist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2020.1853812","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/12/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本项目的主要目的是应用系统综述的方法来综合有关儿童神经心理服务结果的文献。第二个目的是利用系统评价的结果来确定现有文献中的差距,并描述未来研究的重点。方法:我们采用严格的检索策略筛选相关研究,收集方法学变量数据,评估研究偏倚风险,按主题和子主题领域总结研究结果,确定文献的优势和不足,并为未来的研究提供建议。测量的结果是满意度、资源或策略利用的变化、症状或功能的变化(即儿童情绪、行为、认知或学业问题、父母压力或家庭功能的变化)。结果:最终数据来源为26条记录,共涉及974名接受神经心理服务的儿童。根据评估,家长普遍对服务感到满意,并报告了较高的临床医生同理心和提高的知识水平。然而,他们很少报告神经心理学家提供实际帮助。非正式的以家庭和学校为基础的战略比其他类型的建议更经常得到执行。对儿童症状和功能变化的研究是有限的,但建议改善。结论:这是对儿童神经心理服务结果的首次系统综述。需要在多个时间点收集数据进行更大规模的研究,以便进一步阐明导致结果的机制和改进这些机制的潜在目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcomes of pediatric neuropsychological services: A systematic review.

Objective: The primary aim of this project was to apply systematic review methods to synthesize the literature on outcomes of pediatric neuropsychological services. The secondary aim was to use the results of the systematic review to identify gaps in the extant literature and describe priorities for future research. Method: We identified the relevant studies using a rigorous search strategy, collected data on methodological variables, assessed the risk of bias in the studies, summarized findings by topic and subtopic areas, identified strengths and weaknesses of the literature, and provided recommendations for future research. The outcomes measured were satisfaction, changes in resource or strategy utilization, and changes in symptoms or functioning (i.e. changes in child emotional, behavioral, cognitive, or academic problems, parent stress, or family functioning). Results: The final sources of data were 26 records, pertaining to a total of 974 children who received neuropsychological services. Parents were generally satisfied with services and reported high clinician empathy and increased level of knowledge, based on the evaluation. However, they reported less often that the neuropsychologist provided actual help. Informal home and school-based strategies were implemented more often than other types of recommendations. The research on changes in child symptoms and functioning was limited, but suggests improvements. Conclusions: This is the first systematic review of outcomes of pediatric neuropsychological services. Larger studies involving data collection at multiple time points are needed in order to further clarify mechanisms leading to outcomes and potential targets for improving them.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信