Maite Vallejo, Pedro Pa Reyes, Mireya Martinez Garcia, Alejandro G Gonzalez Garay
{"title":"用于晚期症状性恰加斯病(克氏锥虫感染)的锥虫药物。","authors":"Maite Vallejo, Pedro Pa Reyes, Mireya Martinez Garcia, Alejandro G Gonzalez Garay","doi":"10.1002/14651858.CD004102.pub3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People with Chagas disease may develop progressive and lethal heart conditions. Drugs to eliminate the parasite Trypanosoma cruzi (T cruzi) currently carry limited therapeutic value and are used in the early stages of the disease. Extending the use of these drugs to treat chronic chagasic cardiomyopathy (CCC) has also been proposed.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the benefits and harms of nitrofurans and trypanocidal drugs for treating late-stage, symptomatic Chagas disease and CCC in terms of blood parasite reduction or clearance, mortality, adverse effects, and quality of life.</p><p><strong>Search methods: </strong>We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, and LILACS databases on 12 November 2019. We also searched two clinical trials registers, ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), on 3 December 2019.</p><p><strong>Selection criteria: </strong>We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing trypanocidal drugs versus placebo or no treatment for late-stage, symptomatic Chagas disease and CCC.</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong>We conducted the reporting of the review according the standard Cochrane methods. Two review authors independently retrieved articles, performed data extraction, and assessed risk of bias. Any disagreements were resolved by a third review author. We contacted study authors for additional information.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>We included two studies in this review update. One RCT randomly assigned 26 participants to benznidazole 5 mg/kg/day; 27 participants to nifurtimox 5 mg/kg/day; and 24 participants to placebo for 30 days. The second RCT, newly included in this update, randomised 1431 participants to benznidazole 300 mg/day for 40 to 80 days and 1423 participants to placebo. We also identified one ongoing study. Benznidazole compared to placebo At five-year follow-up, low quality of the evidence suggests that there may be a benefit of benznidazole when compared to placebo for clearance or reduction of antibody titres (risk ratio (RR) 1.25, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.14 to 1.37; 1 trial; 1896 participants). We are uncertain about the effects of benznidazole for the clearance of parasitaemia demonstrated by negative xenodiagnosis, blood culture, and/or molecular assays due to very limited evidence. Low quality of the evidence suggests that when compared to placebo, benznidazole may make little to no difference in the risk of heart failure (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.14; 1 trial; 2854 participants) and ventricular tachycardia (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.26; 1 trial; 2854 participants). We found moderate quality of the evidence that adverse events increase with benznidazole when compared to placebo (RR 2.52, 95% CI 2.09 to 3.03; 1 trial; 2854 participants). Adverse effects were observed in 23.9% of patients in the benznidazole group compared to 9.5% in the placebo group. The most frequent adverse effects were: cutaneous rash, gastrointestinal symptoms, and peripheral polyneuropathy. No data were available for the outcomes of pathological demonstration of tissue parasites and quality of life. Nifurtimox compared to placebo Data were only available for this comparison for the outcome clearance or reduction of antibody titres, and we are uncertain about the effect due to very limited evidence. Regarding adverse events, one RCT mentioned in a general manner that nifurtimox caused intense adverse events, without any quantification.</p><p><strong>Authors' conclusions: </strong>There is insufficient evidence to support the efficacy of the trypanocidal drugs benznidazole and nifurtimox for late-stage, symptomatic Chagas disease and CCC.</p>","PeriodicalId":515753,"journal":{"name":"The Cochrane database of systematic reviews","volume":" ","pages":"CD004102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/14651858.CD004102.pub3","citationCount":"37","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trypanocidal drugs for late-stage, symptomatic Chagas disease (Trypanosoma cruzi infection).\",\"authors\":\"Maite Vallejo, Pedro Pa Reyes, Mireya Martinez Garcia, Alejandro G Gonzalez Garay\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/14651858.CD004102.pub3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People with Chagas disease may develop progressive and lethal heart conditions. Drugs to eliminate the parasite Trypanosoma cruzi (T cruzi) currently carry limited therapeutic value and are used in the early stages of the disease. Extending the use of these drugs to treat chronic chagasic cardiomyopathy (CCC) has also been proposed.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the benefits and harms of nitrofurans and trypanocidal drugs for treating late-stage, symptomatic Chagas disease and CCC in terms of blood parasite reduction or clearance, mortality, adverse effects, and quality of life.</p><p><strong>Search methods: </strong>We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, and LILACS databases on 12 November 2019. We also searched two clinical trials registers, ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), on 3 December 2019.</p><p><strong>Selection criteria: </strong>We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing trypanocidal drugs versus placebo or no treatment for late-stage, symptomatic Chagas disease and CCC.</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong>We conducted the reporting of the review according the standard Cochrane methods. Two review authors independently retrieved articles, performed data extraction, and assessed risk of bias. Any disagreements were resolved by a third review author. We contacted study authors for additional information.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>We included two studies in this review update. One RCT randomly assigned 26 participants to benznidazole 5 mg/kg/day; 27 participants to nifurtimox 5 mg/kg/day; and 24 participants to placebo for 30 days. The second RCT, newly included in this update, randomised 1431 participants to benznidazole 300 mg/day for 40 to 80 days and 1423 participants to placebo. We also identified one ongoing study. Benznidazole compared to placebo At five-year follow-up, low quality of the evidence suggests that there may be a benefit of benznidazole when compared to placebo for clearance or reduction of antibody titres (risk ratio (RR) 1.25, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.14 to 1.37; 1 trial; 1896 participants). We are uncertain about the effects of benznidazole for the clearance of parasitaemia demonstrated by negative xenodiagnosis, blood culture, and/or molecular assays due to very limited evidence. Low quality of the evidence suggests that when compared to placebo, benznidazole may make little to no difference in the risk of heart failure (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.14; 1 trial; 2854 participants) and ventricular tachycardia (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.26; 1 trial; 2854 participants). We found moderate quality of the evidence that adverse events increase with benznidazole when compared to placebo (RR 2.52, 95% CI 2.09 to 3.03; 1 trial; 2854 participants). Adverse effects were observed in 23.9% of patients in the benznidazole group compared to 9.5% in the placebo group. The most frequent adverse effects were: cutaneous rash, gastrointestinal symptoms, and peripheral polyneuropathy. No data were available for the outcomes of pathological demonstration of tissue parasites and quality of life. Nifurtimox compared to placebo Data were only available for this comparison for the outcome clearance or reduction of antibody titres, and we are uncertain about the effect due to very limited evidence. Regarding adverse events, one RCT mentioned in a general manner that nifurtimox caused intense adverse events, without any quantification.</p><p><strong>Authors' conclusions: </strong>There is insufficient evidence to support the efficacy of the trypanocidal drugs benznidazole and nifurtimox for late-stage, symptomatic Chagas disease and CCC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":515753,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Cochrane database of systematic reviews\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"CD004102\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/14651858.CD004102.pub3\",\"citationCount\":\"37\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Cochrane database of systematic reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004102.pub3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Cochrane database of systematic reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004102.pub3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 37
摘要
背景:恰加斯病患者可能发展为进行性和致命性心脏疾病。目前用于消除克氏锥虫(T cruzi)寄生虫的药物治疗价值有限,仅用于该疾病的早期阶段。也有人建议将这些药物用于治疗慢性恰加斯型心肌病(CCC)。目的:评价硝基呋喃类和锥虫类药物在治疗晚期、症状性恰加斯病和CCC时血液寄生虫减少或清除、死亡率、不良反应和生活质量方面的利与弊。检索方法:我们于2019年11月12日检索了Cochrane中央对照试验注册库(Central)、MEDLINE、Embase和LILACS数据库。我们还于2019年12月3日检索了两个临床试验注册库ClinicalTrials.gov和世界卫生组织(WHO)国际临床试验注册平台(ICTRP)。选择标准:我们纳入了随机对照试验(RCTs),评估锥虫药物与安慰剂或不治疗晚期、症状性恰加斯病和CCC的疗效。资料收集和分析:我们按照标准Cochrane方法进行综述报告。两位综述作者独立检索文章,进行数据提取,并评估偏倚风险。任何分歧由第三位综述作者解决。我们联系了研究作者以获取更多信息。主要结果:我们在本次综述更新中纳入了两项研究。一项随机对照试验随机分配26名受试者服用苯并硝唑5 mg/kg/天;27名受试者服用尼福替莫司5mg /kg/天;24名参与者服用安慰剂30天。第二项RCT是本次更新中新纳入的,随机分配1431名参与者服用苯并硝唑300毫克/天,持续40至80天,1423名参与者服用安慰剂。我们还发现了一项正在进行的研究。在5年随访中,低质量的证据表明,与安慰剂相比,苯并硝唑在清除或降低抗体滴度方面可能有优势(风险比(RR) 1.25, 95%可信区间(CI) 1.14至1.37;1试验;1896名参与者)。由于证据非常有限,我们不确定苯并硝唑对清除寄生虫病的影响,这些影响是由阴性异种诊断、血培养和/或分子测定所证明的。低质量的证据表明,与安慰剂相比,苯并硝唑在心力衰竭风险方面可能几乎没有差异(RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.69至1.14;1试验;2854名参与者)和室性心动过速(RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.51 ~ 1.26;1试验;2854名参与者)。我们发现中度质量的证据表明,与安慰剂相比,苯并硝唑的不良事件增加(RR 2.52, 95% CI 2.09至3.03;1试验;2854名参与者)。苯并硝唑组23.9%的患者出现不良反应,而安慰剂组为9.5%。最常见的不良反应是:皮疹、胃肠道症状和周围多发性神经病变。没有关于组织寄生虫病理表现和生活质量结果的资料。与安慰剂相比,尼呋替莫的数据仅用于结果清除率或抗体滴度降低的比较,由于证据非常有限,我们不确定其效果。关于不良事件,一项随机对照试验以一般方式提到尼福替莫引起强烈的不良事件,但没有任何量化。作者的结论:没有足够的证据支持锥虫药物苯硝唑和硝呋替莫对晚期、症状性恰加斯病和CCC的疗效。
Trypanocidal drugs for late-stage, symptomatic Chagas disease (Trypanosoma cruzi infection).
Background: People with Chagas disease may develop progressive and lethal heart conditions. Drugs to eliminate the parasite Trypanosoma cruzi (T cruzi) currently carry limited therapeutic value and are used in the early stages of the disease. Extending the use of these drugs to treat chronic chagasic cardiomyopathy (CCC) has also been proposed.
Objectives: To assess the benefits and harms of nitrofurans and trypanocidal drugs for treating late-stage, symptomatic Chagas disease and CCC in terms of blood parasite reduction or clearance, mortality, adverse effects, and quality of life.
Search methods: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, and LILACS databases on 12 November 2019. We also searched two clinical trials registers, ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), on 3 December 2019.
Selection criteria: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing trypanocidal drugs versus placebo or no treatment for late-stage, symptomatic Chagas disease and CCC.
Data collection and analysis: We conducted the reporting of the review according the standard Cochrane methods. Two review authors independently retrieved articles, performed data extraction, and assessed risk of bias. Any disagreements were resolved by a third review author. We contacted study authors for additional information.
Main results: We included two studies in this review update. One RCT randomly assigned 26 participants to benznidazole 5 mg/kg/day; 27 participants to nifurtimox 5 mg/kg/day; and 24 participants to placebo for 30 days. The second RCT, newly included in this update, randomised 1431 participants to benznidazole 300 mg/day for 40 to 80 days and 1423 participants to placebo. We also identified one ongoing study. Benznidazole compared to placebo At five-year follow-up, low quality of the evidence suggests that there may be a benefit of benznidazole when compared to placebo for clearance or reduction of antibody titres (risk ratio (RR) 1.25, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.14 to 1.37; 1 trial; 1896 participants). We are uncertain about the effects of benznidazole for the clearance of parasitaemia demonstrated by negative xenodiagnosis, blood culture, and/or molecular assays due to very limited evidence. Low quality of the evidence suggests that when compared to placebo, benznidazole may make little to no difference in the risk of heart failure (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.14; 1 trial; 2854 participants) and ventricular tachycardia (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.26; 1 trial; 2854 participants). We found moderate quality of the evidence that adverse events increase with benznidazole when compared to placebo (RR 2.52, 95% CI 2.09 to 3.03; 1 trial; 2854 participants). Adverse effects were observed in 23.9% of patients in the benznidazole group compared to 9.5% in the placebo group. The most frequent adverse effects were: cutaneous rash, gastrointestinal symptoms, and peripheral polyneuropathy. No data were available for the outcomes of pathological demonstration of tissue parasites and quality of life. Nifurtimox compared to placebo Data were only available for this comparison for the outcome clearance or reduction of antibody titres, and we are uncertain about the effect due to very limited evidence. Regarding adverse events, one RCT mentioned in a general manner that nifurtimox caused intense adverse events, without any quantification.
Authors' conclusions: There is insufficient evidence to support the efficacy of the trypanocidal drugs benznidazole and nifurtimox for late-stage, symptomatic Chagas disease and CCC.