为应对COVID-19,在独立堕胎提供者中采用无检测和远程医疗药物流产护理

Q2 Medicine
Ushma D. Upadhyay, Rosalyn Schroeder, Sarah C.M. Roberts
{"title":"为应对COVID-19,在独立堕胎提供者中采用无检测和远程医疗药物流产护理","authors":"Ushma D. Upadhyay,&nbsp;Rosalyn Schroeder,&nbsp;Sarah C.M. Roberts","doi":"10.1016/j.conx.2020.100049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Access to abortion care in the United States (US) is restricted by numerous logistical and financial barriers, which have been further intensified by the COVID-19 pandemic. We sought to understand the ways in which COVID-19 prompted changes in clinical practices in abortion care among independent abortion clinics.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>We surveyed independent US abortion clinics and documented changes in practice regarding the provision of abortion since March 1, 2020.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among about 153 independent clinics invited, 100 clinics contributed relevant data and were included in the analytic sample. A total of 87% reported changes in protocols in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Reported changes included moving to telehealth (phone or video) for follow-up (71%), starting or increasing telehealth for patient consultations and screening (41%), reducing Rh testing (43%) and other tests (42%), and omitting the preabortion ultrasound (15%). A total of 20% reported allowing quick pickup of medication abortion pills, and 4% began mailing medications directly to patients after a telehealth consultation. Clinical practice changes were reported throughout all regions of the US, but facilities in the Northeast (73%) were more likely to report starting or increasing telehealth than facilities in the South (23%, p &lt; .001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated use of telehealth among independent abortion clinics, but many clinics, particularly those in the South, have been unable to make these changes. Other practices such as reducing preabortion ultrasounds were less common in all regions despite clinical guidelines and evidence supporting such changes in practice and positive benefits for public health and patient-centered care.</p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>The COVID-19 pandemic has created a window of opportunity to remove barriers to abortion, including expanding telehealth and reducing preabortion tests. Clinics can strive for a culture shift towards simplifying the provision of medication abortion and routinely avoiding preabortion tests and in-person visits. Such changes in practice could have positive benefits for public health and patient-centered care.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10655,"journal":{"name":"Contraception: X","volume":"2 ","pages":"Article 100049"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.conx.2020.100049","citationCount":"44","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adoption of no-test and telehealth medication abortion care among independent abortion providers in response to COVID-19\",\"authors\":\"Ushma D. Upadhyay,&nbsp;Rosalyn Schroeder,&nbsp;Sarah C.M. Roberts\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.conx.2020.100049\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Access to abortion care in the United States (US) is restricted by numerous logistical and financial barriers, which have been further intensified by the COVID-19 pandemic. We sought to understand the ways in which COVID-19 prompted changes in clinical practices in abortion care among independent abortion clinics.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>We surveyed independent US abortion clinics and documented changes in practice regarding the provision of abortion since March 1, 2020.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among about 153 independent clinics invited, 100 clinics contributed relevant data and were included in the analytic sample. A total of 87% reported changes in protocols in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Reported changes included moving to telehealth (phone or video) for follow-up (71%), starting or increasing telehealth for patient consultations and screening (41%), reducing Rh testing (43%) and other tests (42%), and omitting the preabortion ultrasound (15%). A total of 20% reported allowing quick pickup of medication abortion pills, and 4% began mailing medications directly to patients after a telehealth consultation. Clinical practice changes were reported throughout all regions of the US, but facilities in the Northeast (73%) were more likely to report starting or increasing telehealth than facilities in the South (23%, p &lt; .001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated use of telehealth among independent abortion clinics, but many clinics, particularly those in the South, have been unable to make these changes. Other practices such as reducing preabortion ultrasounds were less common in all regions despite clinical guidelines and evidence supporting such changes in practice and positive benefits for public health and patient-centered care.</p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>The COVID-19 pandemic has created a window of opportunity to remove barriers to abortion, including expanding telehealth and reducing preabortion tests. Clinics can strive for a culture shift towards simplifying the provision of medication abortion and routinely avoiding preabortion tests and in-person visits. Such changes in practice could have positive benefits for public health and patient-centered care.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10655,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contraception: X\",\"volume\":\"2 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100049\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.conx.2020.100049\",\"citationCount\":\"44\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contraception: X\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590151620300320\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590151620300320","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 44

摘要

在美国,获得堕胎护理受到许多后勤和财政障碍的限制,COVID-19大流行进一步加剧了这些障碍。我们试图了解COVID-19如何促使独立堕胎诊所的堕胎护理临床实践发生变化。我们调查了独立的美国堕胎诊所,并记录了自2020年3月1日以来提供堕胎服务的实践变化。结果在邀请的153家独立诊所中,有100家诊所提供了相关数据,被纳入分析样本。共有87%的人报告说,为应对COVID-19大流行,方案发生了变化。报告的变化包括转向远程医疗(电话或视频)进行随访(71%),开始或增加远程医疗进行患者咨询和筛查(41%),减少Rh检测(43%)和其他检测(42%),以及省略流产前超声检查(15%)。总共有20%的人报告说,他们允许快速领取药物流产药,4%的人在远程医疗咨询后开始直接向患者邮寄药物。美国所有地区都报告了临床实践的变化,但东北部的设施(73%)比南部的设施(23%,p < .001)更有可能报告开始或增加远程医疗。2019冠状病毒病大流行加速了独立堕胎诊所远程医疗的使用,但许多诊所,特别是南方的诊所,无法做出这些改变。其他做法,如减少流产前超声波检查,在所有地区都不太常见,尽管临床指南和证据支持这种做法的变化和对公共卫生和以患者为中心的护理的积极益处。2019冠状病毒病大流行为消除堕胎障碍创造了机会之窗,包括扩大远程保健和减少堕胎前检查。诊所可以努力推动一种文化转变,简化药物流产的提供,避免常规的流产前检查和亲自就诊。这种实践上的变化可能对公共卫生和以病人为中心的护理产生积极的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Adoption of no-test and telehealth medication abortion care among independent abortion providers in response to COVID-19

Adoption of no-test and telehealth medication abortion care among independent abortion providers in response to COVID-19

Objective

Access to abortion care in the United States (US) is restricted by numerous logistical and financial barriers, which have been further intensified by the COVID-19 pandemic. We sought to understand the ways in which COVID-19 prompted changes in clinical practices in abortion care among independent abortion clinics.

Study design

We surveyed independent US abortion clinics and documented changes in practice regarding the provision of abortion since March 1, 2020.

Results

Among about 153 independent clinics invited, 100 clinics contributed relevant data and were included in the analytic sample. A total of 87% reported changes in protocols in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Reported changes included moving to telehealth (phone or video) for follow-up (71%), starting or increasing telehealth for patient consultations and screening (41%), reducing Rh testing (43%) and other tests (42%), and omitting the preabortion ultrasound (15%). A total of 20% reported allowing quick pickup of medication abortion pills, and 4% began mailing medications directly to patients after a telehealth consultation. Clinical practice changes were reported throughout all regions of the US, but facilities in the Northeast (73%) were more likely to report starting or increasing telehealth than facilities in the South (23%, p < .001).

Conclusion

The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated use of telehealth among independent abortion clinics, but many clinics, particularly those in the South, have been unable to make these changes. Other practices such as reducing preabortion ultrasounds were less common in all regions despite clinical guidelines and evidence supporting such changes in practice and positive benefits for public health and patient-centered care.

Implications

The COVID-19 pandemic has created a window of opportunity to remove barriers to abortion, including expanding telehealth and reducing preabortion tests. Clinics can strive for a culture shift towards simplifying the provision of medication abortion and routinely avoiding preabortion tests and in-person visits. Such changes in practice could have positive benefits for public health and patient-centered care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Contraception: X
Contraception: X Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信