在寻找内在能力的标准指标。批判性文献综述。

E Gonzalez-Bautista, S Andrieu, L M Gutiérrez-Robledo, R E García-Chanes, P de Souto Barreto
{"title":"在寻找内在能力的标准指标。批判性文献综述。","authors":"E Gonzalez-Bautista, S Andrieu, L M Gutiérrez-Robledo, R E García-Chanes, P de Souto Barreto","doi":"10.1007/s12603-020-1394-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Intrinsic capacity is a composite of five domains that summarizes the physical and mental capacities of an individual. Intrinsic capacity is increasing in relevance for adapting health systems to population ageing. Therefore, our objective was to analyse how intrinsic capacity has been assessed in older adults and if these measurements have been validated, as an initial step towards the construction of a standard intrinsic capacity index.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Narrative review with electronic searches performed in PubMed and Cochrane databases, including the studies which used the term \"intrinsic capacity\" in the context of human ageing and health. The full text was then accessed to select studies with at least one operationalised domain of intrinsic capacity. We also looked for information on the validity and reliability of the reported measures of intrinsic capacity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included ten articles reporting a quantitative measurement of intrinsic capacity. There were two intrinsic capacity scores which combined retrospective data on the intrinsic capacity domains sub-scores, with low concordance among tests chosen to measure each domain. Two studies reported on reliability and validity of the IC scores. The main gaps in the construction and validation process were a) analysis undertaken with each domain separately rather than for the construct of intrinsic capacity, b) lack of a clear conceptual and operational definition of the vitality domain, c) summary score that depends upon the distribution of the study sample.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Further validation of the intrinsic capacity concept is needed, together with more robust approaches to measure it. A standard index of IC has not been validated for translation into clinical or research purposes.</p>","PeriodicalId":501202,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Nutrition, Health & Aging","volume":" ","pages":"959-965"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12280598/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In the quest of a Standard Index of Intrinsic Capacity. A Critical Literature Review.\",\"authors\":\"E Gonzalez-Bautista, S Andrieu, L M Gutiérrez-Robledo, R E García-Chanes, P de Souto Barreto\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12603-020-1394-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Intrinsic capacity is a composite of five domains that summarizes the physical and mental capacities of an individual. Intrinsic capacity is increasing in relevance for adapting health systems to population ageing. Therefore, our objective was to analyse how intrinsic capacity has been assessed in older adults and if these measurements have been validated, as an initial step towards the construction of a standard intrinsic capacity index.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Narrative review with electronic searches performed in PubMed and Cochrane databases, including the studies which used the term \\\"intrinsic capacity\\\" in the context of human ageing and health. The full text was then accessed to select studies with at least one operationalised domain of intrinsic capacity. We also looked for information on the validity and reliability of the reported measures of intrinsic capacity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included ten articles reporting a quantitative measurement of intrinsic capacity. There were two intrinsic capacity scores which combined retrospective data on the intrinsic capacity domains sub-scores, with low concordance among tests chosen to measure each domain. Two studies reported on reliability and validity of the IC scores. The main gaps in the construction and validation process were a) analysis undertaken with each domain separately rather than for the construct of intrinsic capacity, b) lack of a clear conceptual and operational definition of the vitality domain, c) summary score that depends upon the distribution of the study sample.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Further validation of the intrinsic capacity concept is needed, together with more robust approaches to measure it. A standard index of IC has not been validated for translation into clinical or research purposes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":501202,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Nutrition, Health & Aging\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"959-965\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12280598/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Nutrition, Health & Aging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-020-1394-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Nutrition, Health & Aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-020-1394-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:内在能力是五个领域的组合,总结了个人的身体和心理能力。在使卫生系统适应人口老龄化方面,内在能力正在增强。因此,我们的目标是分析老年人的内在能力是如何评估的,以及这些测量是否得到了验证,作为构建标准内在能力指数的第一步。设计:在PubMed和Cochrane数据库中进行电子检索,包括在人类衰老和健康背景下使用“内在能力”一词的研究。然后访问全文,以选择具有至少一个内在能力的可操作领域的研究。我们还寻找了关于内在能力报告的有效性和可靠性的信息。结果:我们纳入了10篇报道内在能力定量测量的文章。有两种内在能力得分结合了内在能力领域子得分的回顾性数据,选择测量每个领域的测试之间的一致性较低。两项研究报告了IC分数的信度和效度。构建和验证过程中的主要差距是:a)对每个领域分别进行分析,而不是对内在能力的构建;b)缺乏对活力领域的明确概念和操作定义;c)取决于研究样本分布的总结评分。结论:需要进一步验证内在能力概念,以及更可靠的测量方法。标准的IC指数尚未被验证转化为临床或研究目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In the quest of a Standard Index of Intrinsic Capacity. A Critical Literature Review.

Objectives: Intrinsic capacity is a composite of five domains that summarizes the physical and mental capacities of an individual. Intrinsic capacity is increasing in relevance for adapting health systems to population ageing. Therefore, our objective was to analyse how intrinsic capacity has been assessed in older adults and if these measurements have been validated, as an initial step towards the construction of a standard intrinsic capacity index.

Design: Narrative review with electronic searches performed in PubMed and Cochrane databases, including the studies which used the term "intrinsic capacity" in the context of human ageing and health. The full text was then accessed to select studies with at least one operationalised domain of intrinsic capacity. We also looked for information on the validity and reliability of the reported measures of intrinsic capacity.

Results: We included ten articles reporting a quantitative measurement of intrinsic capacity. There were two intrinsic capacity scores which combined retrospective data on the intrinsic capacity domains sub-scores, with low concordance among tests chosen to measure each domain. Two studies reported on reliability and validity of the IC scores. The main gaps in the construction and validation process were a) analysis undertaken with each domain separately rather than for the construct of intrinsic capacity, b) lack of a clear conceptual and operational definition of the vitality domain, c) summary score that depends upon the distribution of the study sample.

Conclusion: Further validation of the intrinsic capacity concept is needed, together with more robust approaches to measure it. A standard index of IC has not been validated for translation into clinical or research purposes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信