护理人员能否信任信息技术来护理患者?系统的回顾。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Informatics for Health & Social Care Pub Date : 2021-03-02 Epub Date: 2020-12-01 DOI:10.1080/17538157.2020.1834399
Alice Noblin, Barbara Hewitt, Murad Moqbel, Scott Sittig, Lakesha Kinnerson, Vera Rulon
{"title":"护理人员能否信任信息技术来护理患者?系统的回顾。","authors":"Alice Noblin,&nbsp;Barbara Hewitt,&nbsp;Murad Moqbel,&nbsp;Scott Sittig,&nbsp;Lakesha Kinnerson,&nbsp;Vera Rulon","doi":"10.1080/17538157.2020.1834399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) requires that healthcare providers allow patients to engage in their healthcare by allowing access to their health records. Often patients need informal caregivers including family members or others to help them with their care. This paper explores whether trust is a key factor for informal caregivers' decision to use health information technologies (HIT) including electronic health records (EHR), patient portals, mobile apps, or other devices to care for their patient. Six reviewers conducted a comprehensive search of four literature databases using terms that pertained to a caregiver and trust to investigate the role trust plays when caregivers use HIT. While trust is a key factor for the use of HIT, it the researchers only identified ten articles that met the research question thresholds. Four main topics of trust surfaced including perceived confidentiality, perceived security, technological malfunction, and trustworthiness of the information. Trust is a critical factor for informal caregivers when using HIT to assist in the care of their patient (child, loved one, parent, or acquaintance). Based on the findings, it is clear that more research on the use of HIT by caregivers is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":54984,"journal":{"name":"Informatics for Health & Social Care","volume":"46 1","pages":"29-41"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17538157.2020.1834399","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can caregivers trust information technology in the care of their patients? A systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Alice Noblin,&nbsp;Barbara Hewitt,&nbsp;Murad Moqbel,&nbsp;Scott Sittig,&nbsp;Lakesha Kinnerson,&nbsp;Vera Rulon\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17538157.2020.1834399\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) requires that healthcare providers allow patients to engage in their healthcare by allowing access to their health records. Often patients need informal caregivers including family members or others to help them with their care. This paper explores whether trust is a key factor for informal caregivers' decision to use health information technologies (HIT) including electronic health records (EHR), patient portals, mobile apps, or other devices to care for their patient. Six reviewers conducted a comprehensive search of four literature databases using terms that pertained to a caregiver and trust to investigate the role trust plays when caregivers use HIT. While trust is a key factor for the use of HIT, it the researchers only identified ten articles that met the research question thresholds. Four main topics of trust surfaced including perceived confidentiality, perceived security, technological malfunction, and trustworthiness of the information. Trust is a critical factor for informal caregivers when using HIT to assist in the care of their patient (child, loved one, parent, or acquaintance). Based on the findings, it is clear that more research on the use of HIT by caregivers is needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54984,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Informatics for Health & Social Care\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"29-41\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17538157.2020.1834399\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Informatics for Health & Social Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17538157.2020.1834399\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Informatics for Health & Social Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17538157.2020.1834399","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

1996年《健康保险便携性和责任法案》(HIPAA)要求医疗保健提供者允许患者通过访问其健康记录来参与其医疗保健。患者通常需要非正式的护理人员,包括家庭成员或其他人来帮助他们进行护理。本文探讨了信任是否是非正式护理人员决定使用健康信息技术(HIT)的关键因素,包括电子健康记录(EHR)、患者门户网站、移动应用程序或其他设备来护理患者。六位评审员使用与护理人员和信任相关的术语对四个文献数据库进行了全面搜索,以调查护理人员使用HIT时信任所起的作用。虽然信任是使用HIT的关键因素,但研究人员只发现了十篇符合研究问题阈值的文章。信任的四个主要主题浮出水面,包括感知的机密性、感知的安全性、技术故障和信息的可信度。在使用HIT协助照顾患者(孩子、爱人、父母或熟人)时,信任是非正式护理人员的关键因素。根据这些发现,很明显,需要对照顾者使用HIT进行更多的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can caregivers trust information technology in the care of their patients? A systematic review.

The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) requires that healthcare providers allow patients to engage in their healthcare by allowing access to their health records. Often patients need informal caregivers including family members or others to help them with their care. This paper explores whether trust is a key factor for informal caregivers' decision to use health information technologies (HIT) including electronic health records (EHR), patient portals, mobile apps, or other devices to care for their patient. Six reviewers conducted a comprehensive search of four literature databases using terms that pertained to a caregiver and trust to investigate the role trust plays when caregivers use HIT. While trust is a key factor for the use of HIT, it the researchers only identified ten articles that met the research question thresholds. Four main topics of trust surfaced including perceived confidentiality, perceived security, technological malfunction, and trustworthiness of the information. Trust is a critical factor for informal caregivers when using HIT to assist in the care of their patient (child, loved one, parent, or acquaintance). Based on the findings, it is clear that more research on the use of HIT by caregivers is needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
21
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Informatics for Health & Social Care promotes evidence-based informatics as applied to the domain of health and social care. It showcases informatics research and practice within the many and diverse contexts of care; it takes personal information, both its direct and indirect use, as its central focus. The scope of the Journal is broad, encompassing both the properties of care information and the life-cycle of associated information systems. Consideration of the properties of care information will necessarily include the data itself, its representation, structure, and associated processes, as well as the context of its use, highlighting the related communication, computational, cognitive, social and ethical aspects. Consideration of the life-cycle of care information systems includes full range from requirements, specifications, theoretical models and conceptual design through to sustainable implementations, and the valuation of impacts. Empirical evidence experiences related to implementation are particularly welcome. Informatics in Health & Social Care seeks to consolidate and add to the core knowledge within the disciplines of Health and Social Care Informatics. The Journal therefore welcomes scientific papers, case studies and literature reviews. Examples of novel approaches are particularly welcome. Articles might, for example, show how care data is collected and transformed into useful and usable information, how informatics research is translated into practice, how specific results can be generalised, or perhaps provide case studies that facilitate learning from experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信