瑞德西韦治疗重症COVID-19的经验

IF 1.1
Stephen Lee, Anthony Santarelli, Kristen Caine, Sarah Schritter, Tyson Dietrich, John Ashurst
{"title":"瑞德西韦治疗重症COVID-19的经验","authors":"Stephen Lee,&nbsp;Anthony Santarelli,&nbsp;Kristen Caine,&nbsp;Sarah Schritter,&nbsp;Tyson Dietrich,&nbsp;John Ashurst","doi":"10.7556/jaoa.2020.156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Following the emergence of the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), which causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), researchers sought safe and effective treatment modalities. Remdesivir is currently being evaluated for clinical efficacy and safety in patients with COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the clinical outcomes of COVID-19 patients following treatment with remdesivir at a community hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of medical records was conducted in August 2020 for all patients given remdesivir while hospitalized for severe COVID-19 between May 1 and August 19, 2020. A convenience sample of consecutive patients with treatment including remdesivir, antibiotics, convalescent plasma, dexamethasone, or a combination of multiple drugs was included in the analysis. Patients receiving remdesivir were administered a 5-day treatment course. Patients with a glomerular filtration rate of less than 30 mL/min, those with liver function tests 5 times the normal reference range, and those who were pregnant were excluded from treatment with remdesivir. Differences in between men and women were detected with χ2 and independent samples t tests. The degree to which presenting symptoms influenced patient outcomes was analyzed with a stepwise logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 76 patients who received remdesivir, the mean (95% confidence interval, CI) age was 63 years (59.8-66.2). Thirty-six (47.4%) were men and 40 (52.6%) were women. Forty-nine (64.5%) were White and 27 (35.5%) were nonWhite. The majority of patients (54; 71.1%) had at least 1 comorbid condition, with hypertension being the most common (43; 56.6%). The mean (95% CI) length of stay for patients who received remdesivir was 10.09 days (8.6-11.6) and the mean (95% CI) duration of oxygen therapy was 9.42 days (8.0-10.8). A total of 14 (18.4%) patients given remdesivir were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with an mean (95% CI) length of stay of 9.29 days (5.6-13.0). Women administered remdesivir were more likely to be admitted to the ICU (11 [27.5%] vs 3 [8.3%]; P=.031). The mortality rate was 14 patients (18.4%), with no statistically significant difference observed between men (5; 13.9%) and women (9; 22.5%; P=.33). No significant difference was seen amongst sexes for duration of oxygen therapy (men, 8.0 days [6.2-9.8] vs women, 10.76 days [8.8-12.8]; P=.051) or length of stay (men, 8.61 days [6.7-10.5] vs women, 11.43 days [9.3-13.5]; P=.058). There was no statistically significant difference in pooled racial groups (White vs nonWhite) for in-hospital mortality, number admitted to the ICU, days spent in the ICU, duration of oxygen use, or length of stay.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Remdesivir may show clinical efficacy for the treatment of severe COVID-19 in a community setting. Although this was a small-scale study with limited patients, it represents a point of reference for the use of remdesivir at other community hospitals.</p>","PeriodicalId":47816,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN OSTEOPATHIC ASSOCIATION","volume":" ","pages":"926-933"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.7556/jaoa.2020.156","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Remdesivir for the Treatment of Severe COVID-19: A Community Hospital's Experience.\",\"authors\":\"Stephen Lee,&nbsp;Anthony Santarelli,&nbsp;Kristen Caine,&nbsp;Sarah Schritter,&nbsp;Tyson Dietrich,&nbsp;John Ashurst\",\"doi\":\"10.7556/jaoa.2020.156\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Following the emergence of the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), which causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), researchers sought safe and effective treatment modalities. Remdesivir is currently being evaluated for clinical efficacy and safety in patients with COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the clinical outcomes of COVID-19 patients following treatment with remdesivir at a community hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of medical records was conducted in August 2020 for all patients given remdesivir while hospitalized for severe COVID-19 between May 1 and August 19, 2020. A convenience sample of consecutive patients with treatment including remdesivir, antibiotics, convalescent plasma, dexamethasone, or a combination of multiple drugs was included in the analysis. Patients receiving remdesivir were administered a 5-day treatment course. Patients with a glomerular filtration rate of less than 30 mL/min, those with liver function tests 5 times the normal reference range, and those who were pregnant were excluded from treatment with remdesivir. Differences in between men and women were detected with χ2 and independent samples t tests. The degree to which presenting symptoms influenced patient outcomes was analyzed with a stepwise logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 76 patients who received remdesivir, the mean (95% confidence interval, CI) age was 63 years (59.8-66.2). Thirty-six (47.4%) were men and 40 (52.6%) were women. Forty-nine (64.5%) were White and 27 (35.5%) were nonWhite. The majority of patients (54; 71.1%) had at least 1 comorbid condition, with hypertension being the most common (43; 56.6%). The mean (95% CI) length of stay for patients who received remdesivir was 10.09 days (8.6-11.6) and the mean (95% CI) duration of oxygen therapy was 9.42 days (8.0-10.8). A total of 14 (18.4%) patients given remdesivir were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with an mean (95% CI) length of stay of 9.29 days (5.6-13.0). Women administered remdesivir were more likely to be admitted to the ICU (11 [27.5%] vs 3 [8.3%]; P=.031). The mortality rate was 14 patients (18.4%), with no statistically significant difference observed between men (5; 13.9%) and women (9; 22.5%; P=.33). No significant difference was seen amongst sexes for duration of oxygen therapy (men, 8.0 days [6.2-9.8] vs women, 10.76 days [8.8-12.8]; P=.051) or length of stay (men, 8.61 days [6.7-10.5] vs women, 11.43 days [9.3-13.5]; P=.058). There was no statistically significant difference in pooled racial groups (White vs nonWhite) for in-hospital mortality, number admitted to the ICU, days spent in the ICU, duration of oxygen use, or length of stay.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Remdesivir may show clinical efficacy for the treatment of severe COVID-19 in a community setting. Although this was a small-scale study with limited patients, it represents a point of reference for the use of remdesivir at other community hospitals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47816,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN OSTEOPATHIC ASSOCIATION\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"926-933\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.7556/jaoa.2020.156\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN OSTEOPATHIC ASSOCIATION\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7556/jaoa.2020.156\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN OSTEOPATHIC ASSOCIATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7556/jaoa.2020.156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

背景:导致2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的新型严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒-2 (SARS-CoV-2)出现后,研究人员寻求安全有效的治疗方法。目前正在评估Remdesivir对COVID-19患者的临床疗效和安全性。目的:了解社区医院新冠肺炎患者接受瑞德西韦治疗后的临床结果。方法:对2020年5月1日至8月19日期间因重症COVID-19住院期间接受瑞德西韦治疗的所有患者在2020年8月的病历进行回顾性分析。分析中纳入了连续接受瑞德西韦、抗生素、恢复期血浆、地塞米松或多种药物联合治疗的患者的方便样本。接受瑞德西韦治疗的患者接受为期5天的疗程。肾小球滤过率小于30 mL/min、肝功能检查是正常参考范围5倍的患者以及孕妇排除在瑞德西韦治疗之外。采用χ2和独立样本t检验检测男女之间的差异。用逐步逻辑回归分析症状对患者预后的影响程度。结果:76例接受瑞德西韦治疗的患者中,平均(95%置信区间,CI)年龄为63岁(59.8-66.2岁)。其中男性36例(47.4%),女性40例(52.6%)。49例(64.5%)为白人,27例(35.5%)为非白人。大多数患者(54例;71.1%)至少有1种合并症,其中高血压最为常见(43;56.6%)。接受瑞德西韦治疗的患者平均(95% CI)住院时间为10.09天(8.6-11.6),氧疗的平均(95% CI)持续时间为9.42天(8.0-10.8)。接受瑞德西韦治疗的患者共14例(18.4%)入住重症监护病房(ICU),平均(95% CI)住院时间为9.29天(5.6-13.0)。服用瑞德西韦的女性更有可能入住ICU(11人[27.5%]对3人[8.3%]);P = .031)。死亡率为14例(18.4%),男性间无统计学差异(5例;13.9%),女性(9%;22.5%;P = .33)。氧疗持续时间在性别间无显著差异(男性为8.0天[6.2-9.8],女性为10.76天[8.8-12.8];P= 0.051)或停留时间(男性,8.61天[6.7-10.5]vs女性,11.43天[9.3-13.5];P = .058)。在合并的种族组(白人与非白人)中,住院死亡率、入住ICU的人数、在ICU的天数、氧气使用时间或住院时间没有统计学上的显著差异。结论:在社区环境中,瑞德西韦治疗重症COVID-19可能具有临床疗效。虽然这是一项小规模研究,患者数量有限,但它为其他社区医院使用瑞德西韦提供了参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Remdesivir for the Treatment of Severe COVID-19: A Community Hospital's Experience.

Context: Following the emergence of the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), which causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), researchers sought safe and effective treatment modalities. Remdesivir is currently being evaluated for clinical efficacy and safety in patients with COVID-19.

Objective: To describe the clinical outcomes of COVID-19 patients following treatment with remdesivir at a community hospital.

Methods: A retrospective review of medical records was conducted in August 2020 for all patients given remdesivir while hospitalized for severe COVID-19 between May 1 and August 19, 2020. A convenience sample of consecutive patients with treatment including remdesivir, antibiotics, convalescent plasma, dexamethasone, or a combination of multiple drugs was included in the analysis. Patients receiving remdesivir were administered a 5-day treatment course. Patients with a glomerular filtration rate of less than 30 mL/min, those with liver function tests 5 times the normal reference range, and those who were pregnant were excluded from treatment with remdesivir. Differences in between men and women were detected with χ2 and independent samples t tests. The degree to which presenting symptoms influenced patient outcomes was analyzed with a stepwise logistic regression.

Results: Among the 76 patients who received remdesivir, the mean (95% confidence interval, CI) age was 63 years (59.8-66.2). Thirty-six (47.4%) were men and 40 (52.6%) were women. Forty-nine (64.5%) were White and 27 (35.5%) were nonWhite. The majority of patients (54; 71.1%) had at least 1 comorbid condition, with hypertension being the most common (43; 56.6%). The mean (95% CI) length of stay for patients who received remdesivir was 10.09 days (8.6-11.6) and the mean (95% CI) duration of oxygen therapy was 9.42 days (8.0-10.8). A total of 14 (18.4%) patients given remdesivir were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with an mean (95% CI) length of stay of 9.29 days (5.6-13.0). Women administered remdesivir were more likely to be admitted to the ICU (11 [27.5%] vs 3 [8.3%]; P=.031). The mortality rate was 14 patients (18.4%), with no statistically significant difference observed between men (5; 13.9%) and women (9; 22.5%; P=.33). No significant difference was seen amongst sexes for duration of oxygen therapy (men, 8.0 days [6.2-9.8] vs women, 10.76 days [8.8-12.8]; P=.051) or length of stay (men, 8.61 days [6.7-10.5] vs women, 11.43 days [9.3-13.5]; P=.058). There was no statistically significant difference in pooled racial groups (White vs nonWhite) for in-hospital mortality, number admitted to the ICU, days spent in the ICU, duration of oxygen use, or length of stay.

Conclusion: Remdesivir may show clinical efficacy for the treatment of severe COVID-19 in a community setting. Although this was a small-scale study with limited patients, it represents a point of reference for the use of remdesivir at other community hospitals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN OSTEOPATHIC ASSOCIATION
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN OSTEOPATHIC ASSOCIATION MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: JAOA—The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association is the official scientific publication of the American Osteopathic Association, as well as the premier scholarly, peer-reviewed publication of the osteopathic medical profession. The JAOA"s mission is to advance medicine through the scholarly publication of peer-reviewed osteopathic medical research. The JAOA"s goals are: 1. To be the authoritative scholarly publication of the osteopathic medical profession 2. To advance the traditional tenets of osteopathic medicine while encouraging the development of emerging concepts relevant to the profession"s distinctiveness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信