在撒哈拉以南非洲测量避孕自我效能:肯尼亚和尼日利亚CSESSA量表的开发和验证

Q2 Medicine
Lillian Whiting-Collins , Lindsay Grenier , Peter J. Winch , Amy Tsui , Pamela K. Donohue
{"title":"在撒哈拉以南非洲测量避孕自我效能:肯尼亚和尼日利亚CSESSA量表的开发和验证","authors":"Lillian Whiting-Collins ,&nbsp;Lindsay Grenier ,&nbsp;Peter J. Winch ,&nbsp;Amy Tsui ,&nbsp;Pamela K. Donohue","doi":"10.1016/j.conx.2020.100041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Contraceptive self-efficacy, a women's belief about her own ability to complete the actions necessary for successful family planning, is a well-documented determinant of contraceptive use. However, there is currently no validated measure appropriate for low-resource settings. We developed and tested a new scale to measure Contraceptive Self-Efficacy among women in sub-Saharan Africa (CSESSA) using samples in Kenya and Nigeria.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>The CSESSA scale was administered to women in Kenya (<em>n</em> = 314) and Nigeria (<em>n</em> = 414). Reliability and validity were analyzed separately by setting. Validity analysis included assessment of the area under the curve (AUC) to demonstrate predictive capability of CSESSA score for contraceptive use. Logistic regression was employed to test the relationship between CSESSA score and contraceptive use.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Item reduction resulted in 11 items in Kenya (<em>α</em> = 0.90) and 10 items in Nigeria (<em>α</em> = 0.93). Three domains of contraceptive self-efficacy emerged in both settings: (1) husband/partner communication, (2) provider communication and (3) choosing and managing a method. Items related to the first two subscales, but not the third, were identical across settings. The AUC indicated predictive capability as mild in Kenya (AUC = 0.58) and strong in Nigeria (AUC = 0.73). In both settings, CSESSA score was associated with use of a modern contraceptive method at 12 months postpartum.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The CSESSA scale is a reliable and valid measure in two countries. Variation of the third subscale by site indicates that certain scale items may be more relevant in areas of low versus high contraceptive prevalence. Further research should be done to validate this subscale in other contexts.</p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>This study contributes a reliable, valid measure of contraceptive self-efficacy in two African countries. The CSESSA scale and subscales can be administered in research (for example for evaluation of interventions to increase contraceptive uptake) or in a clinical setting to inform and improve contraceptive counseling.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10655,"journal":{"name":"Contraception: X","volume":"2 ","pages":"Article 100041"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.conx.2020.100041","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring contraceptive self-efficacy in sub-Saharan Africa: development and validation of the CSESSA scale in Kenya and Nigeria\",\"authors\":\"Lillian Whiting-Collins ,&nbsp;Lindsay Grenier ,&nbsp;Peter J. Winch ,&nbsp;Amy Tsui ,&nbsp;Pamela K. Donohue\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.conx.2020.100041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Contraceptive self-efficacy, a women's belief about her own ability to complete the actions necessary for successful family planning, is a well-documented determinant of contraceptive use. However, there is currently no validated measure appropriate for low-resource settings. We developed and tested a new scale to measure Contraceptive Self-Efficacy among women in sub-Saharan Africa (CSESSA) using samples in Kenya and Nigeria.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>The CSESSA scale was administered to women in Kenya (<em>n</em> = 314) and Nigeria (<em>n</em> = 414). Reliability and validity were analyzed separately by setting. Validity analysis included assessment of the area under the curve (AUC) to demonstrate predictive capability of CSESSA score for contraceptive use. Logistic regression was employed to test the relationship between CSESSA score and contraceptive use.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Item reduction resulted in 11 items in Kenya (<em>α</em> = 0.90) and 10 items in Nigeria (<em>α</em> = 0.93). Three domains of contraceptive self-efficacy emerged in both settings: (1) husband/partner communication, (2) provider communication and (3) choosing and managing a method. Items related to the first two subscales, but not the third, were identical across settings. The AUC indicated predictive capability as mild in Kenya (AUC = 0.58) and strong in Nigeria (AUC = 0.73). In both settings, CSESSA score was associated with use of a modern contraceptive method at 12 months postpartum.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The CSESSA scale is a reliable and valid measure in two countries. Variation of the third subscale by site indicates that certain scale items may be more relevant in areas of low versus high contraceptive prevalence. Further research should be done to validate this subscale in other contexts.</p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>This study contributes a reliable, valid measure of contraceptive self-efficacy in two African countries. The CSESSA scale and subscales can be administered in research (for example for evaluation of interventions to increase contraceptive uptake) or in a clinical setting to inform and improve contraceptive counseling.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10655,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contraception: X\",\"volume\":\"2 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100041\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.conx.2020.100041\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contraception: X\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590151620300241\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590151620300241","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

目的避孕自我效能,即妇女对自己完成成功计划生育所需行动的能力的信念,是避孕药具使用的一个有充分证据的决定因素。然而,目前还没有针对低资源环境的有效措施。我们开发并测试了一种新的量表来测量撒哈拉以南非洲妇女的避孕自我效能(CSESSA),使用肯尼亚和尼日利亚的样本。研究设计对肯尼亚(n = 314)和尼日利亚(n = 414)的妇女实施CSESSA量表。通过设置分别对信度和效度进行分析。效度分析包括曲线下面积(AUC)的评估,以证明CSESSA评分对避孕药使用的预测能力。采用Logistic回归检验CSESSA评分与避孕药具使用的关系。结果肯尼亚和尼日利亚分别减少了11项(α = 0.90)和10项(α = 0.93)。在这两种情况下,避孕自我效能的三个领域出现了:(1)丈夫/伴侣的沟通,(2)提供者的沟通,(3)选择和管理一种方法。与前两个子量表相关的项目,而不是第三个子量表,在不同的设置中是相同的。AUC显示肯尼亚的预测能力较弱(AUC = 0.58),尼日利亚的预测能力较强(AUC = 0.73)。在这两种情况下,CSESSA评分与产后12个月使用现代避孕方法有关。结论CSESSA量表在两国均是一种可靠、有效的量表。第三次量表在不同地区的差异表明,某些量表项目在避孕普及率低与高的地区可能更相关。进一步的研究应该在其他情况下验证这个分量表。本研究为两个非洲国家提供了一种可靠、有效的避孕自我效能测量方法。CSESSA量表和子量表可用于研究(例如用于评估增加避孕措施的干预措施)或临床环境中,以告知和改进避孕咨询。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Measuring contraceptive self-efficacy in sub-Saharan Africa: development and validation of the CSESSA scale in Kenya and Nigeria

Measuring contraceptive self-efficacy in sub-Saharan Africa: development and validation of the CSESSA scale in Kenya and Nigeria

Measuring contraceptive self-efficacy in sub-Saharan Africa: development and validation of the CSESSA scale in Kenya and Nigeria

Objectives

Contraceptive self-efficacy, a women's belief about her own ability to complete the actions necessary for successful family planning, is a well-documented determinant of contraceptive use. However, there is currently no validated measure appropriate for low-resource settings. We developed and tested a new scale to measure Contraceptive Self-Efficacy among women in sub-Saharan Africa (CSESSA) using samples in Kenya and Nigeria.

Study design

The CSESSA scale was administered to women in Kenya (n = 314) and Nigeria (n = 414). Reliability and validity were analyzed separately by setting. Validity analysis included assessment of the area under the curve (AUC) to demonstrate predictive capability of CSESSA score for contraceptive use. Logistic regression was employed to test the relationship between CSESSA score and contraceptive use.

Results

Item reduction resulted in 11 items in Kenya (α = 0.90) and 10 items in Nigeria (α = 0.93). Three domains of contraceptive self-efficacy emerged in both settings: (1) husband/partner communication, (2) provider communication and (3) choosing and managing a method. Items related to the first two subscales, but not the third, were identical across settings. The AUC indicated predictive capability as mild in Kenya (AUC = 0.58) and strong in Nigeria (AUC = 0.73). In both settings, CSESSA score was associated with use of a modern contraceptive method at 12 months postpartum.

Conclusions

The CSESSA scale is a reliable and valid measure in two countries. Variation of the third subscale by site indicates that certain scale items may be more relevant in areas of low versus high contraceptive prevalence. Further research should be done to validate this subscale in other contexts.

Implications

This study contributes a reliable, valid measure of contraceptive self-efficacy in two African countries. The CSESSA scale and subscales can be administered in research (for example for evaluation of interventions to increase contraceptive uptake) or in a clinical setting to inform and improve contraceptive counseling.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Contraception: X
Contraception: X Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信