新常态还是一切照旧?东亚和东南亚金融危机给2019冠状病毒病的教训。

O Fiona Yap
{"title":"新常态还是一切照旧?东亚和东南亚金融危机给2019冠状病毒病的教训。","authors":"O Fiona Yap","doi":"10.1057/s41287-020-00327-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Crises and dislocations home in on social, economic, and political weaknesses that are often sidestepped or pushed to the backburner in the interests of master plans of growth or development. Recovery from crises, then, provides the opportunity to address these underlying issues that preceded and, likely, contributed to the crises or dislocation; meanwhile, a return to the previous normalcy following such crises generally means exacerbation of these weaknesses that erode and threaten to fracture social, economic and political foundations. This paper documents social and economic policies across two financial crises, the Asian Financial Crisis and the Global Financial Crisis, for South Korea, the Philippines, and Indonesia, to reveal the problems from growth-centric recovery focus on economic fragilities, social cohesion, and political stability. Further, using evidence from the ground and survey data, we also show how recovery to a new normal with a reprioritization of social policies invigorates the social, political, and economic foundations. We round off the study with an examination of social policy changes under COVID-19 to assess how the efforts track against a recovery to business-as-usual economic normalcy or a new normal that reprioritizes social policies and the economy. The scope of change is high; as we show in the paper, it is also necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":506319,"journal":{"name":"The European Journal of Development Research","volume":"32 5","pages":"1504-1534"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1057/s41287-020-00327-3","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A New Normal or Business-as-Usual? Lessons for COVID-19 from Financial Crises in East and Southeast Asia.\",\"authors\":\"O Fiona Yap\",\"doi\":\"10.1057/s41287-020-00327-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Crises and dislocations home in on social, economic, and political weaknesses that are often sidestepped or pushed to the backburner in the interests of master plans of growth or development. Recovery from crises, then, provides the opportunity to address these underlying issues that preceded and, likely, contributed to the crises or dislocation; meanwhile, a return to the previous normalcy following such crises generally means exacerbation of these weaknesses that erode and threaten to fracture social, economic and political foundations. This paper documents social and economic policies across two financial crises, the Asian Financial Crisis and the Global Financial Crisis, for South Korea, the Philippines, and Indonesia, to reveal the problems from growth-centric recovery focus on economic fragilities, social cohesion, and political stability. Further, using evidence from the ground and survey data, we also show how recovery to a new normal with a reprioritization of social policies invigorates the social, political, and economic foundations. We round off the study with an examination of social policy changes under COVID-19 to assess how the efforts track against a recovery to business-as-usual economic normalcy or a new normal that reprioritizes social policies and the economy. The scope of change is high; as we show in the paper, it is also necessary.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":506319,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The European Journal of Development Research\",\"volume\":\"32 5\",\"pages\":\"1504-1534\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1057/s41287-020-00327-3\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The European Journal of Development Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-020-00327-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/10/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European Journal of Development Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-020-00327-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/10/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

危机和混乱集中在社会、经济和政治弱点上,而这些弱点往往在增长或发展的总体规划中被回避或搁置。因此,从危机中复苏提供了解决这些潜在问题的机会,这些问题早于危机或混乱,而且很可能助长了危机或混乱;与此同时,在这些危机之后恢复到以前的正常状态通常意味着这些削弱和威胁破坏社会、经济和政治基础的弱点的加剧。本文记录了韩国、菲律宾和印度尼西亚在两次金融危机(亚洲金融危机和全球金融危机)期间的社会和经济政策,以揭示以增长为中心的复苏在经济脆弱性、社会凝聚力和政治稳定方面存在的问题。此外,利用实地证据和调查数据,我们还展示了如何通过重新确定社会政策的优先顺序来恢复新常态,从而激活社会、政治和经济基础。我们对2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)下的社会政策变化进行了研究,以评估这些努力如何与恢复正常经济常态或重新优先考虑社会政策和经济的新常态相匹配。变化的范围很大;正如我们在论文中所展示的,这也是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A New Normal or Business-as-Usual? Lessons for COVID-19 from Financial Crises in East and Southeast Asia.

A New Normal or Business-as-Usual? Lessons for COVID-19 from Financial Crises in East and Southeast Asia.

Crises and dislocations home in on social, economic, and political weaknesses that are often sidestepped or pushed to the backburner in the interests of master plans of growth or development. Recovery from crises, then, provides the opportunity to address these underlying issues that preceded and, likely, contributed to the crises or dislocation; meanwhile, a return to the previous normalcy following such crises generally means exacerbation of these weaknesses that erode and threaten to fracture social, economic and political foundations. This paper documents social and economic policies across two financial crises, the Asian Financial Crisis and the Global Financial Crisis, for South Korea, the Philippines, and Indonesia, to reveal the problems from growth-centric recovery focus on economic fragilities, social cohesion, and political stability. Further, using evidence from the ground and survey data, we also show how recovery to a new normal with a reprioritization of social policies invigorates the social, political, and economic foundations. We round off the study with an examination of social policy changes under COVID-19 to assess how the efforts track against a recovery to business-as-usual economic normalcy or a new normal that reprioritizes social policies and the economy. The scope of change is high; as we show in the paper, it is also necessary.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信