中国脑卒中康复患者心理弹性问卷的编制与验证。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING
Lian-Huan Cai, Qi Zhang, Shu-Qin Pang, Hui Chen, Ming Li
{"title":"中国脑卒中康复患者心理弹性问卷的编制与验证。","authors":"Lian-Huan Cai,&nbsp;Qi Zhang,&nbsp;Shu-Qin Pang,&nbsp;Hui Chen,&nbsp;Ming Li","doi":"10.1097/RNJ.0000000000000295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of the study was to develop a comprehensive questionnaire for assessing resilience in patients with stroke during rehabilitation and examine the questionnaire's reliability and validity.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A four-phased design was used to develop and validate the questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The preliminary items of the Resilience Questionnaire for Stroke Rehabilitation (RQSR) were generated through a literature review and a qualitative study. Twenty experts were consulted for content validation and modification of the questionnaire. A pilot study was conducted with 55 patients with stroke. A total of 510 participants from seven rehabilitation centers or hospitals were subsequently recruited to examine the psychometric properties of the RQSR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The RQSR consists of 35 items within three dimensions. Dimensions include effective rehabilitation training, accessible support system, and appropriate self-regulation. The content validity index of the total questionnaire was .9335. Seven factors were derived through factor analysis, and cumulative contribution rate of variance was 65.455%. Cronbach's alpha of the total questionnaire was .957, with each dimension ranging from .731 to .918, demonstrating high levels of reliability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The RQSR has sound reliability and validity and can be used as an appropriate tool for assessing resilience for patients with stroke during rehabilitation to facilitate effective interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":49631,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation Nursing","volume":"46 4","pages":"214-221"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and Validation of a Resilience Questionnaire for Patients During Stroke Rehabilitation in China.\",\"authors\":\"Lian-Huan Cai,&nbsp;Qi Zhang,&nbsp;Shu-Qin Pang,&nbsp;Hui Chen,&nbsp;Ming Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/RNJ.0000000000000295\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of the study was to develop a comprehensive questionnaire for assessing resilience in patients with stroke during rehabilitation and examine the questionnaire's reliability and validity.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A four-phased design was used to develop and validate the questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The preliminary items of the Resilience Questionnaire for Stroke Rehabilitation (RQSR) were generated through a literature review and a qualitative study. Twenty experts were consulted for content validation and modification of the questionnaire. A pilot study was conducted with 55 patients with stroke. A total of 510 participants from seven rehabilitation centers or hospitals were subsequently recruited to examine the psychometric properties of the RQSR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The RQSR consists of 35 items within three dimensions. Dimensions include effective rehabilitation training, accessible support system, and appropriate self-regulation. The content validity index of the total questionnaire was .9335. Seven factors were derived through factor analysis, and cumulative contribution rate of variance was 65.455%. Cronbach's alpha of the total questionnaire was .957, with each dimension ranging from .731 to .918, demonstrating high levels of reliability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The RQSR has sound reliability and validity and can be used as an appropriate tool for assessing resilience for patients with stroke during rehabilitation to facilitate effective interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49631,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rehabilitation Nursing\",\"volume\":\"46 4\",\"pages\":\"214-221\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rehabilitation Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/RNJ.0000000000000295\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rehabilitation Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RNJ.0000000000000295","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:设计一份评估脑卒中患者康复过程中心理弹性的综合问卷,并对问卷的信效度进行检验。设计:采用四阶段设计来开发和验证问卷。方法:通过文献查阅和质性研究,编制脑卒中康复弹性问卷(RQSR)的初步项目。咨询了20位专家对问卷进行内容验证和修改。对55名中风患者进行了一项初步研究。随后,共有510名来自7个康复中心或医院的参与者被招募来检查RQSR的心理测量特性。结果:RQSR在三个维度中包含35个条目。维度包括有效的康复训练、可获得的支持系统和适当的自我调节。整个问卷的内容效度指数为。9335。通过因子分析导出7个因子,累积方差贡献率为65.455%。整个问卷的Cronbach's alpha值为0.957,各维度的取值范围为0.731 ~ 0.918,信度较高。结论:RQSR具有良好的信度和效度,可作为评估脑卒中患者康复过程中恢复力的合适工具,为有效干预提供依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and Validation of a Resilience Questionnaire for Patients During Stroke Rehabilitation in China.

Purpose: The aim of the study was to develop a comprehensive questionnaire for assessing resilience in patients with stroke during rehabilitation and examine the questionnaire's reliability and validity.

Design: A four-phased design was used to develop and validate the questionnaire.

Methods: The preliminary items of the Resilience Questionnaire for Stroke Rehabilitation (RQSR) were generated through a literature review and a qualitative study. Twenty experts were consulted for content validation and modification of the questionnaire. A pilot study was conducted with 55 patients with stroke. A total of 510 participants from seven rehabilitation centers or hospitals were subsequently recruited to examine the psychometric properties of the RQSR.

Results: The RQSR consists of 35 items within three dimensions. Dimensions include effective rehabilitation training, accessible support system, and appropriate self-regulation. The content validity index of the total questionnaire was .9335. Seven factors were derived through factor analysis, and cumulative contribution rate of variance was 65.455%. Cronbach's alpha of the total questionnaire was .957, with each dimension ranging from .731 to .918, demonstrating high levels of reliability.

Conclusion: The RQSR has sound reliability and validity and can be used as an appropriate tool for assessing resilience for patients with stroke during rehabilitation to facilitate effective interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rehabilitation Nursing
Rehabilitation Nursing 医学-护理
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
68
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Rehabilitation Nursing is a refereed, award-winning publication and is the official journal of the Association of Rehabilitation Nurses. Its purpose is to provide rehabilitation professionals with high-quality articles with a primary focus on rehabilitation nursing. Topics range from administration and research to education and clinical topics, and nursing perspectives, with continuing education opportunities in every issue. Articles range from administration and research to education and clinical topics; nursing perspectives, resource reviews, and product information; and continuing education opportunities in every issue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信