人感染H7N9禽流感病毒的血清学证据:系统回顾和荟萃分析

Wei Wang, Xinhua Chen, Yan Wang, Shengjie Lai, Juan Yang, Benjamin J Cowling, Peter W Horby, Timothy M Uyeki, Hongjie Yu
{"title":"人感染H7N9禽流感病毒的血清学证据:系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Wei Wang,&nbsp;Xinhua Chen,&nbsp;Yan Wang,&nbsp;Shengjie Lai,&nbsp;Juan Yang,&nbsp;Benjamin J Cowling,&nbsp;Peter W Horby,&nbsp;Timothy M Uyeki,&nbsp;Hongjie Yu","doi":"10.1093/infdis/jiaa679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The extent of human infections with avian influenza A(H7N9) virus, including mild and asymptomatic infections, is uncertain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of serosurveys for avian influenza A(H7N9) virus infections in humans published during 2013-2020. Three seropositive definitions were assessed to estimate pooled seroprevalence, seroconversion rate, and seroincidence by types of exposures. We applied a scoring system to assess the quality of included studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 31 included studies, pooled seroprevalence of A(H7N9) virus antibodies from all participants was 0.02%, with poultry workers, close contacts, and general populations having seroprevalence of 0.1%, 0.2%, and 0.02%, respectively, based on the World Health Organization (WHO)-recommended definition. Although most infections were asymptomatic, evidence of infection was highest in poultry workers (5% seroconversion, 19.1% seroincidence per 100 person-years). Use of different virus clades did not significantly affect seroprevalence estimates. Most serological studies were of low to moderate quality and did not follow standardized seroepidemiological protocols or WHO-recommended laboratory methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Human infections with avian influenza A(H7N9) virus have been uncommon, especially for general populations. Workers with occupational exposures to poultry and close contacts of A(H7N9) human cases had low risks of infection.</p>","PeriodicalId":509652,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"70-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/infdis/jiaa679","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Serological Evidence of Human Infection With Avian Influenza A(H7N9) Virus: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Wei Wang,&nbsp;Xinhua Chen,&nbsp;Yan Wang,&nbsp;Shengjie Lai,&nbsp;Juan Yang,&nbsp;Benjamin J Cowling,&nbsp;Peter W Horby,&nbsp;Timothy M Uyeki,&nbsp;Hongjie Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/infdis/jiaa679\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The extent of human infections with avian influenza A(H7N9) virus, including mild and asymptomatic infections, is uncertain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of serosurveys for avian influenza A(H7N9) virus infections in humans published during 2013-2020. Three seropositive definitions were assessed to estimate pooled seroprevalence, seroconversion rate, and seroincidence by types of exposures. We applied a scoring system to assess the quality of included studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 31 included studies, pooled seroprevalence of A(H7N9) virus antibodies from all participants was 0.02%, with poultry workers, close contacts, and general populations having seroprevalence of 0.1%, 0.2%, and 0.02%, respectively, based on the World Health Organization (WHO)-recommended definition. Although most infections were asymptomatic, evidence of infection was highest in poultry workers (5% seroconversion, 19.1% seroincidence per 100 person-years). Use of different virus clades did not significantly affect seroprevalence estimates. Most serological studies were of low to moderate quality and did not follow standardized seroepidemiological protocols or WHO-recommended laboratory methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Human infections with avian influenza A(H7N9) virus have been uncommon, especially for general populations. Workers with occupational exposures to poultry and close contacts of A(H7N9) human cases had low risks of infection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":509652,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Infectious Diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"70-82\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/infdis/jiaa679\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Infectious Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiaa679\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiaa679","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:人感染甲型H7N9禽流感病毒(包括轻度和无症状感染)的程度尚不确定。方法:我们对2013-2020年公布的人感染H7N9禽流感病毒血清调查进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。评估了三种血清阳性定义,以估计按暴露类型汇总的血清阳性率、血清转化率和血清发病率。我们采用评分系统来评估纳入研究的质量。结果:根据世界卫生组织(WHO)推荐的定义,在31项纳入的研究中,所有参与者的甲型H7N9病毒抗体血清总阳性率为0.02%,其中家禽工人、密切接触者和一般人群的血清阳性率分别为0.1%、0.2%和0.02%。虽然大多数感染无症状,但感染证据在家禽工人中最高(5%血清转化,每100人年19.1%血清发病率)。使用不同的病毒分支对血清流行率的估计没有显著影响。大多数血清学研究质量低至中等,没有遵循标准化的血清流行病学方案或世卫组织推荐的实验室方法。结论:人感染甲型H7N9禽流感病毒并不常见,特别是在一般人群中。职业接触家禽的工作人员和甲型H7N9人感染病例密切接触者感染风险低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Serological Evidence of Human Infection With Avian Influenza A(H7N9) Virus: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Serological Evidence of Human Infection With Avian Influenza A(H7N9) Virus: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Serological Evidence of Human Infection With Avian Influenza A(H7N9) Virus: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Serological Evidence of Human Infection With Avian Influenza A(H7N9) Virus: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Background: The extent of human infections with avian influenza A(H7N9) virus, including mild and asymptomatic infections, is uncertain.

Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of serosurveys for avian influenza A(H7N9) virus infections in humans published during 2013-2020. Three seropositive definitions were assessed to estimate pooled seroprevalence, seroconversion rate, and seroincidence by types of exposures. We applied a scoring system to assess the quality of included studies.

Results: Of 31 included studies, pooled seroprevalence of A(H7N9) virus antibodies from all participants was 0.02%, with poultry workers, close contacts, and general populations having seroprevalence of 0.1%, 0.2%, and 0.02%, respectively, based on the World Health Organization (WHO)-recommended definition. Although most infections were asymptomatic, evidence of infection was highest in poultry workers (5% seroconversion, 19.1% seroincidence per 100 person-years). Use of different virus clades did not significantly affect seroprevalence estimates. Most serological studies were of low to moderate quality and did not follow standardized seroepidemiological protocols or WHO-recommended laboratory methods.

Conclusions: Human infections with avian influenza A(H7N9) virus have been uncommon, especially for general populations. Workers with occupational exposures to poultry and close contacts of A(H7N9) human cases had low risks of infection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信