小肠细菌过度生长的替代治疗方法:系统综述。

Melissa A Nickles, Aliza Hasan, Anastasia Shakhbazova, Sarah Wright, Cynthia J Chambers, Raja K Sivamani
{"title":"小肠细菌过度生长的替代治疗方法:系统综述。","authors":"Melissa A Nickles,&nbsp;Aliza Hasan,&nbsp;Anastasia Shakhbazova,&nbsp;Sarah Wright,&nbsp;Cynthia J Chambers,&nbsp;Raja K Sivamani","doi":"10.1089/acm.2020.0275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Broad-spectrum antibiotics are the first-line treatment for small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO). However, many antibiotics have a considerable side-effect profile and SIBO commonly reoccurs after successful eradication with antibiotics. Alternative therapies such as probiotics, therapeutic diets, and herbal medicines have been used to individualize SIBO management, particularly in recalcitrant cases. <b><i>Objectives:</i></b> The objective of this review is to evaluate the role of alternative therapies in SIBO treatment. <b><i>Data Sources:</i></b> EMBASE, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Central Register were systematically searched for clinical studies evaluating alternative therapies in the management of SIBO. <b><i>Study Eligibility Criteria:</i></b> Human studies in which an alternative intervention was used to treat SIBO were included. Alternative interventions were defined as an intervention that included a probiotic supplement, herbal preparation, or a dietary change. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), nonrandomized clinical trials with or without a control, and crossover studies were included. <b><i>Study Appraisal:</i></b> The following information was extracted from the selected studies: study type, study participants, SIBO subtype, intervention, comparison, outcome measures, relevant results, relevant side effects, and Jadad score. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Eight studies met inclusion criteria. The studies evaluated probiotics (<i>n</i> = 5), therapeutic diet (<i>n</i> = 1), and herbal medicines (<i>n</i> = 2). Among these studies, there were four RCTs, two open-label single-arm studies, one randomized, double-blind crossover study, and one two-arm open-label study with crossover. Main results are summarized. <b><i>Limitations:</i></b> There may be studies not captured by the defined search criteria. Additionally, studies used different methodologies in both breath testing and measurement of clinical symptoms, making it difficult to draw conclusions on SIBO eradication and symptom improvement across studies. <b><i>Conclusions and Implications:</i></b> Our findings suggest preliminary evidence for a role of alternative therapies in the treatment of SIBO. However, robust clinical trials are generally lacking. Existing studies tend to be small and lack standardized formulations of treatment. Breath testing protocols and clinical symptom measurement greatly varied between studies. Large-scale, randomized, placebo-controlled trials are needed to further evaluate the best way to utilize alternative therapies in the treatment of SIBO.</p>","PeriodicalId":520659,"journal":{"name":"Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.)","volume":" ","pages":"108-119"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/acm.2020.0275","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Alternative Treatment Approaches to Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Melissa A Nickles,&nbsp;Aliza Hasan,&nbsp;Anastasia Shakhbazova,&nbsp;Sarah Wright,&nbsp;Cynthia J Chambers,&nbsp;Raja K Sivamani\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/acm.2020.0275\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Broad-spectrum antibiotics are the first-line treatment for small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO). However, many antibiotics have a considerable side-effect profile and SIBO commonly reoccurs after successful eradication with antibiotics. Alternative therapies such as probiotics, therapeutic diets, and herbal medicines have been used to individualize SIBO management, particularly in recalcitrant cases. <b><i>Objectives:</i></b> The objective of this review is to evaluate the role of alternative therapies in SIBO treatment. <b><i>Data Sources:</i></b> EMBASE, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Central Register were systematically searched for clinical studies evaluating alternative therapies in the management of SIBO. <b><i>Study Eligibility Criteria:</i></b> Human studies in which an alternative intervention was used to treat SIBO were included. Alternative interventions were defined as an intervention that included a probiotic supplement, herbal preparation, or a dietary change. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), nonrandomized clinical trials with or without a control, and crossover studies were included. <b><i>Study Appraisal:</i></b> The following information was extracted from the selected studies: study type, study participants, SIBO subtype, intervention, comparison, outcome measures, relevant results, relevant side effects, and Jadad score. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Eight studies met inclusion criteria. The studies evaluated probiotics (<i>n</i> = 5), therapeutic diet (<i>n</i> = 1), and herbal medicines (<i>n</i> = 2). Among these studies, there were four RCTs, two open-label single-arm studies, one randomized, double-blind crossover study, and one two-arm open-label study with crossover. Main results are summarized. <b><i>Limitations:</i></b> There may be studies not captured by the defined search criteria. Additionally, studies used different methodologies in both breath testing and measurement of clinical symptoms, making it difficult to draw conclusions on SIBO eradication and symptom improvement across studies. <b><i>Conclusions and Implications:</i></b> Our findings suggest preliminary evidence for a role of alternative therapies in the treatment of SIBO. However, robust clinical trials are generally lacking. Existing studies tend to be small and lack standardized formulations of treatment. Breath testing protocols and clinical symptom measurement greatly varied between studies. Large-scale, randomized, placebo-controlled trials are needed to further evaluate the best way to utilize alternative therapies in the treatment of SIBO.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520659,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"108-119\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/acm.2020.0275\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2020.0275\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/10/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2020.0275","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/10/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

背景:广谱抗生素是治疗小肠细菌过度生长(SIBO)的一线药物。然而,许多抗生素具有相当大的副作用,并且SIBO通常在抗生素成功根除后再次发生。替代疗法,如益生菌、治疗性饮食和草药已被用于个性化SIBO管理,特别是在顽固的病例中。目的:本综述的目的是评估替代疗法在SIBO治疗中的作用。数据来源:EMBASE、MEDLINE和Cochrane Central Register系统地检索了评估SIBO治疗替代疗法的临床研究。研究资格标准:纳入使用替代干预治疗SIBO的人类研究。替代干预被定义为包括益生菌补充、草药制剂或饮食改变的干预。包括随机对照试验(rct)、有或没有对照的非随机临床试验和交叉研究。研究评价:从选定的研究中提取以下信息:研究类型、研究参与者、SIBO亚型、干预、比较、结局测量、相关结果、相关副作用和Jadad评分。结果:8项研究符合纳入标准。这些研究评估了益生菌(n = 5)、治疗性饮食(n = 1)和草药(n = 2)。在这些研究中,有4项随机对照试验、2项开放标签单臂研究、1项随机、双盲交叉研究和1项开放标签双臂交叉研究。总结了主要研究结果。局限性:可能存在未被定义的搜索标准捕获的研究。此外,研究在呼吸测试和临床症状测量中使用了不同的方法,因此很难在研究中得出关于SIBO根除和症状改善的结论。结论和意义:我们的研究结果为替代疗法在SIBO治疗中的作用提供了初步证据。然而,普遍缺乏可靠的临床试验。现有的研究往往规模小,缺乏标准化的治疗方案。不同研究的呼吸测试方案和临床症状测量差异很大。需要大规模、随机、安慰剂对照试验来进一步评估利用替代疗法治疗SIBO的最佳方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Alternative Treatment Approaches to Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth: A Systematic Review.

Background: Broad-spectrum antibiotics are the first-line treatment for small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO). However, many antibiotics have a considerable side-effect profile and SIBO commonly reoccurs after successful eradication with antibiotics. Alternative therapies such as probiotics, therapeutic diets, and herbal medicines have been used to individualize SIBO management, particularly in recalcitrant cases. Objectives: The objective of this review is to evaluate the role of alternative therapies in SIBO treatment. Data Sources: EMBASE, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Central Register were systematically searched for clinical studies evaluating alternative therapies in the management of SIBO. Study Eligibility Criteria: Human studies in which an alternative intervention was used to treat SIBO were included. Alternative interventions were defined as an intervention that included a probiotic supplement, herbal preparation, or a dietary change. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), nonrandomized clinical trials with or without a control, and crossover studies were included. Study Appraisal: The following information was extracted from the selected studies: study type, study participants, SIBO subtype, intervention, comparison, outcome measures, relevant results, relevant side effects, and Jadad score. Results: Eight studies met inclusion criteria. The studies evaluated probiotics (n = 5), therapeutic diet (n = 1), and herbal medicines (n = 2). Among these studies, there were four RCTs, two open-label single-arm studies, one randomized, double-blind crossover study, and one two-arm open-label study with crossover. Main results are summarized. Limitations: There may be studies not captured by the defined search criteria. Additionally, studies used different methodologies in both breath testing and measurement of clinical symptoms, making it difficult to draw conclusions on SIBO eradication and symptom improvement across studies. Conclusions and Implications: Our findings suggest preliminary evidence for a role of alternative therapies in the treatment of SIBO. However, robust clinical trials are generally lacking. Existing studies tend to be small and lack standardized formulations of treatment. Breath testing protocols and clinical symptom measurement greatly varied between studies. Large-scale, randomized, placebo-controlled trials are needed to further evaluate the best way to utilize alternative therapies in the treatment of SIBO.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信