{"title":"莫氏冷冻切片组织学检查中不同血红素染色亚型对皮肤恶性肿瘤最佳显微解释的评价。","authors":"J A Gabriel, M Shams, G E Orchard","doi":"10.1080/09674845.2020.1838075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Mohs technique employs mainly H&E-stained frozen sections for surgical margin assessment of cutaneous excisions, utilising microscopic evaluation of the complete, circumferential, peripheral and deep margins. This study aimed to determine which mordant based haematoxylin (Ehrlich's, Cole's, Mayer's, Gill's I, Gill's II, Gill's III, Weigert's, Harris' or Carazzi's) produced the optimal morphological clarity of staining for the identification of cellular and tissue morphology of cutaneous basal cell carcinoma (BCC).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>In total, 100 anonymised patient cases were selected, sectioned and stained with each haematoxylin subtype. The slides were independently evaluated microscopically by two assessors. A combined score was generated to determine the sensitivity (defined as the intensity of haematoxylin staining being too weak or too strong and the colour appearance of the haematoxylin not being blue/black) and specificity (defined as the appearance of background staining with haematoxylin, uneven staining and staining deposits) for each of the nine haematoxylin subtypes. The scoring criteria were based on the UKNEQAS CPT Mohs procedure assessment criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The scores generated for specificity identified Carazzi's haematoxylin as best performing (99.2%) followed by Gill's III (98.4%), Ehrlich's (98.2%) and Harris' (85.0%). The sensitivity score again identified Carazzi's as producing the best result (85.0%) followed by Weigert's (83.4%), Ehrlich's (81.6%) and Gill's III (80.4%).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Carazzi's haematoxylin is the most optimal staining dye for the identification of BCC tumour for use as part of the Mohs micrographic surgery procedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":9236,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Biomedical Science","volume":"78 2","pages":"78-86"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09674845.2020.1838075","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of different haematoxylin stain subtypes for the optimal microscopic interpretation of cutaneous malignancy in Mohs frozen section histological procedure.\",\"authors\":\"J A Gabriel, M Shams, G E Orchard\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09674845.2020.1838075\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Mohs technique employs mainly H&E-stained frozen sections for surgical margin assessment of cutaneous excisions, utilising microscopic evaluation of the complete, circumferential, peripheral and deep margins. This study aimed to determine which mordant based haematoxylin (Ehrlich's, Cole's, Mayer's, Gill's I, Gill's II, Gill's III, Weigert's, Harris' or Carazzi's) produced the optimal morphological clarity of staining for the identification of cellular and tissue morphology of cutaneous basal cell carcinoma (BCC).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>In total, 100 anonymised patient cases were selected, sectioned and stained with each haematoxylin subtype. The slides were independently evaluated microscopically by two assessors. A combined score was generated to determine the sensitivity (defined as the intensity of haematoxylin staining being too weak or too strong and the colour appearance of the haematoxylin not being blue/black) and specificity (defined as the appearance of background staining with haematoxylin, uneven staining and staining deposits) for each of the nine haematoxylin subtypes. The scoring criteria were based on the UKNEQAS CPT Mohs procedure assessment criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The scores generated for specificity identified Carazzi's haematoxylin as best performing (99.2%) followed by Gill's III (98.4%), Ehrlich's (98.2%) and Harris' (85.0%). The sensitivity score again identified Carazzi's as producing the best result (85.0%) followed by Weigert's (83.4%), Ehrlich's (81.6%) and Gill's III (80.4%).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Carazzi's haematoxylin is the most optimal staining dye for the identification of BCC tumour for use as part of the Mohs micrographic surgery procedure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Biomedical Science\",\"volume\":\"78 2\",\"pages\":\"78-86\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09674845.2020.1838075\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Biomedical Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09674845.2020.1838075\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/12/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Biomedical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09674845.2020.1838075","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/12/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
背景:Mohs技术主要采用h&e染色冷冻切片对皮肤切除的手术边缘进行评估,利用显微镜对完整的、周围的、周围的和深边缘进行评估。本研究旨在确定哪种介质基血红素(Ehrlich's, Cole's, Mayer's, Gill's I, Gill's II, Gill's III, Weigert's, Harris' s或Carazzi's)在鉴定皮肤基底细胞癌(BCC)的细胞和组织形态时产生最佳的形态学清晰度。材料与方法:共选取100例匿名患者,对每个血红素亚型进行切片和染色。载玻片由两名评估员在显微镜下独立评估。生成一个综合评分,以确定每种9种血红素亚型的敏感性(定义为血红素染色强度过弱或过强,以及血红素的颜色外观不是蓝色/黑色)和特异性(定义为血红素背景染色,不均匀染色和染色沉积物的外观)。评分标准基于UKNEQAS CPT Mohs程序评估标准。结果:特异性评分结果表明,Carazzi的血红素效果最好(99.2%),其次是Gill的(98.4%),Ehrlich的(98.2%)和Harris的(85.0%)。灵敏度评分再次表明,Carazzi的结果最好(85.0%),其次是Weigert的(83.4%),Ehrlich的(81.6%)和Gill的III(80.4%)。讨论:Carazzi的haematoxylin是鉴定BCC肿瘤的最佳染色染料,用于Mohs显微摄影手术程序的一部分。
Evaluation of different haematoxylin stain subtypes for the optimal microscopic interpretation of cutaneous malignancy in Mohs frozen section histological procedure.
Background: The Mohs technique employs mainly H&E-stained frozen sections for surgical margin assessment of cutaneous excisions, utilising microscopic evaluation of the complete, circumferential, peripheral and deep margins. This study aimed to determine which mordant based haematoxylin (Ehrlich's, Cole's, Mayer's, Gill's I, Gill's II, Gill's III, Weigert's, Harris' or Carazzi's) produced the optimal morphological clarity of staining for the identification of cellular and tissue morphology of cutaneous basal cell carcinoma (BCC).
Material and methods: In total, 100 anonymised patient cases were selected, sectioned and stained with each haematoxylin subtype. The slides were independently evaluated microscopically by two assessors. A combined score was generated to determine the sensitivity (defined as the intensity of haematoxylin staining being too weak or too strong and the colour appearance of the haematoxylin not being blue/black) and specificity (defined as the appearance of background staining with haematoxylin, uneven staining and staining deposits) for each of the nine haematoxylin subtypes. The scoring criteria were based on the UKNEQAS CPT Mohs procedure assessment criteria.
Results: The scores generated for specificity identified Carazzi's haematoxylin as best performing (99.2%) followed by Gill's III (98.4%), Ehrlich's (98.2%) and Harris' (85.0%). The sensitivity score again identified Carazzi's as producing the best result (85.0%) followed by Weigert's (83.4%), Ehrlich's (81.6%) and Gill's III (80.4%).
Discussion: Carazzi's haematoxylin is the most optimal staining dye for the identification of BCC tumour for use as part of the Mohs micrographic surgery procedure.
期刊介绍:
The British Journal of Biomedical Science is committed to publishing high quality original research that represents a clear advance in the practice of biomedical science, and reviews that summarise recent advances in the field of biomedical science. The overall aim of the Journal is to provide a platform for the dissemination of new and innovative information on the diagnosis and management of disease that is valuable to the practicing laboratory scientist.