同性恋和双性恋男性健康调查中个体内部和二元因素的整合:近期文献的叙述性回顾。

IF 2 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES
JOURNAL OF GLBT FAMILY STUDIES Pub Date : 2020-01-01 Epub Date: 2019-11-19 DOI:10.1080/1550428x.2019.1682740
Gabriel Robles, Stephen C Bosco, Trey V Dellucci, Tyrel J Starks
{"title":"同性恋和双性恋男性健康调查中个体内部和二元因素的整合:近期文献的叙述性回顾。","authors":"Gabriel Robles,&nbsp;Stephen C Bosco,&nbsp;Trey V Dellucci,&nbsp;Tyrel J Starks","doi":"10.1080/1550428x.2019.1682740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gay and bisexual men (GBM) experience disproportionate rates of mental health and other negative health outcomes. For GBM in relationships, contextualizing the myriad of negative outcomes as a dyadic process may provide insight into the mechanisms through which these adverse outcomes develop. The objective of this review is to examine the current state of the relationship science literature using a health framework, <i>Relationship Process and Health</i>. We conducted a search for articles using PubMed, PsycInfo, and Web of Science for empirical articles in English published in the past 15 years on GBM in a relationship, assessing attachment, and relationship functioning as predictors of health outcomes. We found 649 articles. After screening, 23 articles were identified and reviewed. Findings overwhelming identified HIV risk as the primary health outcome. Attachment was associated with relationship functioning and sexual risk behaviors. Relationship-specific components were largely used as predictors of sexual HIV transmission risk behaviors. Together, these studies suggest that relationship functioning is a prospective link between attachment and health-related outcomes. The literature has yet to examine empirically dyadic-level mechanisms that may explain the association between individual attachment and health outcomes aside from HIV risk, and needs more examination of other health disparities affecting GBM.</p>","PeriodicalId":46967,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF GLBT FAMILY STUDIES","volume":"16 5","pages":"488-513"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1550428x.2019.1682740","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrating intra-individual and dyadic factors in examining health among gay and bisexual men: A narrative review of recent literature.\",\"authors\":\"Gabriel Robles,&nbsp;Stephen C Bosco,&nbsp;Trey V Dellucci,&nbsp;Tyrel J Starks\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1550428x.2019.1682740\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Gay and bisexual men (GBM) experience disproportionate rates of mental health and other negative health outcomes. For GBM in relationships, contextualizing the myriad of negative outcomes as a dyadic process may provide insight into the mechanisms through which these adverse outcomes develop. The objective of this review is to examine the current state of the relationship science literature using a health framework, <i>Relationship Process and Health</i>. We conducted a search for articles using PubMed, PsycInfo, and Web of Science for empirical articles in English published in the past 15 years on GBM in a relationship, assessing attachment, and relationship functioning as predictors of health outcomes. We found 649 articles. After screening, 23 articles were identified and reviewed. Findings overwhelming identified HIV risk as the primary health outcome. Attachment was associated with relationship functioning and sexual risk behaviors. Relationship-specific components were largely used as predictors of sexual HIV transmission risk behaviors. Together, these studies suggest that relationship functioning is a prospective link between attachment and health-related outcomes. The literature has yet to examine empirically dyadic-level mechanisms that may explain the association between individual attachment and health outcomes aside from HIV risk, and needs more examination of other health disparities affecting GBM.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46967,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF GLBT FAMILY STUDIES\",\"volume\":\"16 5\",\"pages\":\"488-513\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1550428x.2019.1682740\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF GLBT FAMILY STUDIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1550428x.2019.1682740\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/11/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF GLBT FAMILY STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1550428x.2019.1682740","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/11/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

男同性恋和双性恋男性(GBM)在心理健康和其他负面健康结果方面的比例不成比例。对于关系中的GBM,将无数的负面结果作为一个二元过程放在背景中,可能会让我们深入了解这些负面结果发展的机制。这篇综述的目的是用健康框架——关系过程和健康——来研究关系科学文献的现状。我们在PubMed、PsycInfo和Web of Science上搜索了过去15年发表的关于关系中的GBM、评估依恋和关系功能作为健康结果预测因素的实证文章。我们找到了649篇文章。经筛选,筛选出23篇文献进行综述。调查结果压倒性地将艾滋病毒风险确定为主要健康结果。依恋与关系功能和性风险行为有关。关系特异性成分在很大程度上被用作HIV性传播风险行为的预测因子。总之,这些研究表明,关系功能是依恋与健康相关结果之间的一个潜在联系。除了艾滋病毒风险之外,文献还需要检验经验层面的机制,这些机制可能解释个人依恋与健康结果之间的关联,并且需要更多地检查影响GBM的其他健康差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Integrating intra-individual and dyadic factors in examining health among gay and bisexual men: A narrative review of recent literature.

Gay and bisexual men (GBM) experience disproportionate rates of mental health and other negative health outcomes. For GBM in relationships, contextualizing the myriad of negative outcomes as a dyadic process may provide insight into the mechanisms through which these adverse outcomes develop. The objective of this review is to examine the current state of the relationship science literature using a health framework, Relationship Process and Health. We conducted a search for articles using PubMed, PsycInfo, and Web of Science for empirical articles in English published in the past 15 years on GBM in a relationship, assessing attachment, and relationship functioning as predictors of health outcomes. We found 649 articles. After screening, 23 articles were identified and reviewed. Findings overwhelming identified HIV risk as the primary health outcome. Attachment was associated with relationship functioning and sexual risk behaviors. Relationship-specific components were largely used as predictors of sexual HIV transmission risk behaviors. Together, these studies suggest that relationship functioning is a prospective link between attachment and health-related outcomes. The literature has yet to examine empirically dyadic-level mechanisms that may explain the association between individual attachment and health outcomes aside from HIV risk, and needs more examination of other health disparities affecting GBM.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of GLBT Family Studies is a much-needed resource on the working dynamics of the diverse family structures found in every corner of the world. This groundbreaking new journal addresses the vital issues facing gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender individuals and their families. Edited by Dr. Jerry J. Bigner, who has provided expert witness testimony in legal cases and in the litigation involving same-sex marriages in Canada, the journal features interdisciplinary studies and scholarly essays on topics related to GLBT family life and functioning as well as relationships with other families.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信