{"title":"鞘内自体骨髓干细胞治疗儿童自闭症:一项随机对照试验","authors":"Narges Sharifzadeh MD, Ali Ghasemi MD, Jalil Tavakol Afshari MD, Fatemeh Moharari MD, Atefeh Soltanifar MD, Ali Talaei MD, Hamid Reza Pouryousof MD, Mahsa Nahidi MD, Mohammad Reza Fayyazi Bordbar MD, Maliheh Ziaee MD","doi":"10.1111/appy.12445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of treatment with autologous bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell (BMMSCs) compared with the routine treatment in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In this ethically approved randomized controlled trial, 32 ASD children aged 5-15 years were randomly assigned to receive either autologous BMMSC plus rehabilitation therapy and risperidone (intervention group) or rehabilitation therapy and risperidone (control group). Autologous BMMSCs were intrathecally injected in the intervention group twice in 4 weeks. Patients were assessed using childhood autism rating scale (CARS), Gilliam autism rating scale-second edition (GARS-II), and clinical global impression (CGI) at the baseline, as well as 6 and 12 months after intervention.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Overall, 32 patients in two groups of intervention (n = 14) and control (n = 18) completed the study, of which 27 (84.4%) were male. Mean age was 9.50 ± 2.14 years. The improvements in CARS total score, GARS-II autism index, and CGI global improvement showed no significant differences between the groups over 12 months. However, the main effect for time*group interaction was significant regarding the CGI-severity of illness, showing a significantly more pronounced improvement in the intervention group (F = 6.719; <i>P</i> = .002).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>Intrathecal injection of autologous BMMSCs seems to be safe and feasible, but has limited clinical efficacy in treatment of children with ASD.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8618,"journal":{"name":"Asia‐Pacific Psychiatry","volume":"13 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/appy.12445","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intrathecal autologous bone marrow stem cell therapy in children with autism: A randomized controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Narges Sharifzadeh MD, Ali Ghasemi MD, Jalil Tavakol Afshari MD, Fatemeh Moharari MD, Atefeh Soltanifar MD, Ali Talaei MD, Hamid Reza Pouryousof MD, Mahsa Nahidi MD, Mohammad Reza Fayyazi Bordbar MD, Maliheh Ziaee MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/appy.12445\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of treatment with autologous bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell (BMMSCs) compared with the routine treatment in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>In this ethically approved randomized controlled trial, 32 ASD children aged 5-15 years were randomly assigned to receive either autologous BMMSC plus rehabilitation therapy and risperidone (intervention group) or rehabilitation therapy and risperidone (control group). Autologous BMMSCs were intrathecally injected in the intervention group twice in 4 weeks. Patients were assessed using childhood autism rating scale (CARS), Gilliam autism rating scale-second edition (GARS-II), and clinical global impression (CGI) at the baseline, as well as 6 and 12 months after intervention.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Overall, 32 patients in two groups of intervention (n = 14) and control (n = 18) completed the study, of which 27 (84.4%) were male. Mean age was 9.50 ± 2.14 years. The improvements in CARS total score, GARS-II autism index, and CGI global improvement showed no significant differences between the groups over 12 months. However, the main effect for time*group interaction was significant regarding the CGI-severity of illness, showing a significantly more pronounced improvement in the intervention group (F = 6.719; <i>P</i> = .002).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Discussion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Intrathecal injection of autologous BMMSCs seems to be safe and feasible, but has limited clinical efficacy in treatment of children with ASD.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8618,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia‐Pacific Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"13 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/appy.12445\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia‐Pacific Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/appy.12445\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia‐Pacific Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/appy.12445","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Intrathecal autologous bone marrow stem cell therapy in children with autism: A randomized controlled trial
Introduction
This study aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of treatment with autologous bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell (BMMSCs) compared with the routine treatment in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD).
Methods
In this ethically approved randomized controlled trial, 32 ASD children aged 5-15 years were randomly assigned to receive either autologous BMMSC plus rehabilitation therapy and risperidone (intervention group) or rehabilitation therapy and risperidone (control group). Autologous BMMSCs were intrathecally injected in the intervention group twice in 4 weeks. Patients were assessed using childhood autism rating scale (CARS), Gilliam autism rating scale-second edition (GARS-II), and clinical global impression (CGI) at the baseline, as well as 6 and 12 months after intervention.
Results
Overall, 32 patients in two groups of intervention (n = 14) and control (n = 18) completed the study, of which 27 (84.4%) were male. Mean age was 9.50 ± 2.14 years. The improvements in CARS total score, GARS-II autism index, and CGI global improvement showed no significant differences between the groups over 12 months. However, the main effect for time*group interaction was significant regarding the CGI-severity of illness, showing a significantly more pronounced improvement in the intervention group (F = 6.719; P = .002).
Discussion
Intrathecal injection of autologous BMMSCs seems to be safe and feasible, but has limited clinical efficacy in treatment of children with ASD.
期刊介绍:
Asia-Pacific Psychiatry is an international psychiatric journal focused on the Asia and Pacific Rim region, and is the official journal of the Pacific Rim College of Psychiatrics. Asia-Pacific Psychiatry enables psychiatric and other mental health professionals in the region to share their research, education programs and clinical experience with a larger international readership. The journal offers a venue for high quality research for and from the region in the face of minimal international publication availability for authors concerned with the region. This includes findings highlighting the diversity in psychiatric behaviour, treatment and outcome related to social, ethnic, cultural and economic differences of the region. The journal publishes peer-reviewed articles and reviews, as well as clinically and educationally focused papers on regional best practices. Images, videos, a young psychiatrist''s corner, meeting reports, a journal club and contextual commentaries differentiate this journal from existing main stream psychiatry journals that are focused on other regions, or nationally focused within countries of Asia and the Pacific Rim.