喙突骨骺分离分型新体系:9例临床评价及文献复习。

IF 1.2 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Advances in Orthopedics Pub Date : 2020-10-23 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2020/9749515
Takamitsu Mondori, Yoshiyuki Nakagawa, Shimpei Kurata, Shuhei Fujii, Takuya Egawa, Kazuya Inoue, Yasuhito Tanaka
{"title":"喙突骨骺分离分型新体系:9例临床评价及文献复习。","authors":"Takamitsu Mondori,&nbsp;Yoshiyuki Nakagawa,&nbsp;Shimpei Kurata,&nbsp;Shuhei Fujii,&nbsp;Takuya Egawa,&nbsp;Kazuya Inoue,&nbsp;Yasuhito Tanaka","doi":"10.1155/2020/9749515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objectives and Design</i>. Epiphyseal separation of the coracoid process (CP) rarely occurs in adolescents. In this retrospective case series, we reviewed the data of nine patients treated at our center and those of 28 patients reported in the literature. This injury can be classified into three types according to the injured area: Type I, base including the area above the glenoid; Type II, center including the coracoclavicular ligament (CCL); and Type III, tip with the short head of the biceps and coracobrachialis, as well as the pectoralis minor. <i>Patients/Participants</i>. A total of 37 patients were included in the analysis. Data on sex, age, cause and mechanism of injury, separation type, concomitant injury around the shoulder girdle, treatment, and functional outcomes were obtained. <i>Main Outcome Measurements and Results</i>. Type I is the most common type. The cause of injury and associated injury around the shoulder girdle were significantly different between Type I, II, and III fractures. The associated acromioclavicular (AC) dislocation and treatment were significantly different between Type I and III fractures. Our new classification system reflects the clinical features, imaging findings, and surgical management of epiphyseal separation of the CP. Type I and II fractures are mostly associated with AC dislocation and have an associated injury around the shoulder girdle. Type III fractures are typically caused by forceful resisted flexion of the arm and elbow. Although the latter are best managed surgically, whether conservative or surgical management is optimal for Type I and II fractures remains controversial. <i>Conclusions</i>. We noted some differences in the clinical characteristics depending on the location of injury; therefore, we aimed to examine these differences to develop a new system for classifying epiphyseal separation of the CP. This would increase the clinicians' awareness regarding this injury and lead to the development of an appropriate treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":7358,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Orthopedics","volume":"2020 ","pages":"9749515"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2020/9749515","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New System for the Classification of Epiphyseal Separation of the Coracoid Process: Evaluation of Nine Cases and Review of the Literature.\",\"authors\":\"Takamitsu Mondori,&nbsp;Yoshiyuki Nakagawa,&nbsp;Shimpei Kurata,&nbsp;Shuhei Fujii,&nbsp;Takuya Egawa,&nbsp;Kazuya Inoue,&nbsp;Yasuhito Tanaka\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2020/9749515\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Objectives and Design</i>. Epiphyseal separation of the coracoid process (CP) rarely occurs in adolescents. In this retrospective case series, we reviewed the data of nine patients treated at our center and those of 28 patients reported in the literature. This injury can be classified into three types according to the injured area: Type I, base including the area above the glenoid; Type II, center including the coracoclavicular ligament (CCL); and Type III, tip with the short head of the biceps and coracobrachialis, as well as the pectoralis minor. <i>Patients/Participants</i>. A total of 37 patients were included in the analysis. Data on sex, age, cause and mechanism of injury, separation type, concomitant injury around the shoulder girdle, treatment, and functional outcomes were obtained. <i>Main Outcome Measurements and Results</i>. Type I is the most common type. The cause of injury and associated injury around the shoulder girdle were significantly different between Type I, II, and III fractures. The associated acromioclavicular (AC) dislocation and treatment were significantly different between Type I and III fractures. Our new classification system reflects the clinical features, imaging findings, and surgical management of epiphyseal separation of the CP. Type I and II fractures are mostly associated with AC dislocation and have an associated injury around the shoulder girdle. Type III fractures are typically caused by forceful resisted flexion of the arm and elbow. Although the latter are best managed surgically, whether conservative or surgical management is optimal for Type I and II fractures remains controversial. <i>Conclusions</i>. We noted some differences in the clinical characteristics depending on the location of injury; therefore, we aimed to examine these differences to develop a new system for classifying epiphyseal separation of the CP. This would increase the clinicians' awareness regarding this injury and lead to the development of an appropriate treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7358,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Orthopedics\",\"volume\":\"2020 \",\"pages\":\"9749515\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2020/9749515\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Orthopedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/9749515\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/9749515","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目标和设计。喙突骨骺分离(CP)很少发生在青少年。在这个回顾性病例系列中,我们回顾了在本中心治疗的9例患者和文献中报道的28例患者的数据。根据损伤区域的不同,这种损伤可分为三种类型:I型,基底包括关节盂以上区域;II型,中心包括喙锁韧带(CCL);第三型,顶端有二头肌和喙臂肌的短头,以及胸小肌。患者/参与者。共有37例患者被纳入分析。获得了性别、年龄、损伤原因和机制、分离类型、肩带周围并发损伤、治疗和功能结局的数据。主要结果测量和结果。I型是最常见的类型。I型、II型和III型骨折的损伤原因和肩带周围的相关损伤有显著差异。ⅰ型和ⅲ型骨折的肩锁关节脱位及治疗方法有显著差异。我们的新分类系统反映了CP骨骺分离的临床特征、影像学表现和手术处理。I型和II型骨折大多与AC脱位相关,并伴有肩带周围损伤。III型骨折通常是由手臂和肘部的强力抵抗弯曲引起的。尽管后者是手术治疗的最佳方法,但对于I型和II型骨折,保守治疗还是手术治疗仍有争议。结论。我们注意到临床特征的一些差异取决于损伤的位置;因此,我们旨在研究这些差异,以开发一种新的CP骨骺分离分类系统。这将提高临床医生对这种损伤的认识,并导致适当治疗的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

New System for the Classification of Epiphyseal Separation of the Coracoid Process: Evaluation of Nine Cases and Review of the Literature.

New System for the Classification of Epiphyseal Separation of the Coracoid Process: Evaluation of Nine Cases and Review of the Literature.

New System for the Classification of Epiphyseal Separation of the Coracoid Process: Evaluation of Nine Cases and Review of the Literature.

New System for the Classification of Epiphyseal Separation of the Coracoid Process: Evaluation of Nine Cases and Review of the Literature.

Objectives and Design. Epiphyseal separation of the coracoid process (CP) rarely occurs in adolescents. In this retrospective case series, we reviewed the data of nine patients treated at our center and those of 28 patients reported in the literature. This injury can be classified into three types according to the injured area: Type I, base including the area above the glenoid; Type II, center including the coracoclavicular ligament (CCL); and Type III, tip with the short head of the biceps and coracobrachialis, as well as the pectoralis minor. Patients/Participants. A total of 37 patients were included in the analysis. Data on sex, age, cause and mechanism of injury, separation type, concomitant injury around the shoulder girdle, treatment, and functional outcomes were obtained. Main Outcome Measurements and Results. Type I is the most common type. The cause of injury and associated injury around the shoulder girdle were significantly different between Type I, II, and III fractures. The associated acromioclavicular (AC) dislocation and treatment were significantly different between Type I and III fractures. Our new classification system reflects the clinical features, imaging findings, and surgical management of epiphyseal separation of the CP. Type I and II fractures are mostly associated with AC dislocation and have an associated injury around the shoulder girdle. Type III fractures are typically caused by forceful resisted flexion of the arm and elbow. Although the latter are best managed surgically, whether conservative or surgical management is optimal for Type I and II fractures remains controversial. Conclusions. We noted some differences in the clinical characteristics depending on the location of injury; therefore, we aimed to examine these differences to develop a new system for classifying epiphyseal separation of the CP. This would increase the clinicians' awareness regarding this injury and lead to the development of an appropriate treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Orthopedics is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that provides a forum for orthopaedics working on improving the quality of orthopedic health care. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to arthroplasty, hand surgery, limb reconstruction, pediatric orthopaedics, sports medicine, trauma, spinal deformities, and orthopaedic oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信