儿童高压球囊扩张:30例POM患者的结果及膀胱镜评估的意义。

Q3 Medicine
Francesca Destro, Giorgio Selvaggio, Federica Marinoni, Andrea Pansini, Giovanna Riccipetitoni
{"title":"儿童高压球囊扩张:30例POM患者的结果及膀胱镜评估的意义。","authors":"Francesca Destro,&nbsp;Giorgio Selvaggio,&nbsp;Federica Marinoni,&nbsp;Andrea Pansini,&nbsp;Giovanna Riccipetitoni","doi":"10.4081/pmc.2020.214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Primary Obstructive Megaureter (POM) is a common cause of hydronephrosis in children with spontaneous resolution in most cases. High-Pressure Balloon Dilatation (HPBD) has been proposed as a minimally invasive procedure for POM correction in selected patients. The aim of the paper is to review our experience with HPBD in patients with POM. We performed a retrospective study in a single Centre collecting data on patients' demographics, diagnostic modalities, surgical details, results and follow-up. In particular, the endoscopic aspect of the orifice permitted the identification of 3 patterns: adynamic ureteral segment, stenotic ureteric ring and pseudoureterocelic orifice. We performed HPBD in 30 patients over 6 years. We had 23 patients with adynamic distal ureteral segment (type 1), 4 with stenotic ring (type 2) and 3 with ureterocelic orifice (type 3). In 3 patients (10%) the guidewire did not easily pass into the ureter requiring ureteral stenting or papillotomy. Post-operative course was uneventful. Five patients (3 pseudoureterocelic) required open surgery during follow-up. HPBD for the treatment of POM is a safe and feasible procedure and it can be a definitive treatment of POM. Complications are mainly due to double J stent and none of our patients had symptoms related to vescico-ureteral reflux. The aspect of the orifice, identified during cystoscopy, seems to correlate with the efficacy of the dilatation: type 1 and 2 are associated with good and excellent results respectively; type 3 do not permit dilatation in almost all cases requiring papillotomy. HPBD can be performed in selected patients of all paediatric ages as first therapeutic line. The presence of a pseudoureterocelic orifice or long stenosis might interfere with the ureteral stenting and seems associated with worse outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":35535,"journal":{"name":"Pediatria Medica e Chirurgica","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4081/pmc.2020.214","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High-pressure balloon dilatation in children: our results in 30 patients with POM and the implications of the cystoscopic evaluation.\",\"authors\":\"Francesca Destro,&nbsp;Giorgio Selvaggio,&nbsp;Federica Marinoni,&nbsp;Andrea Pansini,&nbsp;Giovanna Riccipetitoni\",\"doi\":\"10.4081/pmc.2020.214\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Primary Obstructive Megaureter (POM) is a common cause of hydronephrosis in children with spontaneous resolution in most cases. High-Pressure Balloon Dilatation (HPBD) has been proposed as a minimally invasive procedure for POM correction in selected patients. The aim of the paper is to review our experience with HPBD in patients with POM. We performed a retrospective study in a single Centre collecting data on patients' demographics, diagnostic modalities, surgical details, results and follow-up. In particular, the endoscopic aspect of the orifice permitted the identification of 3 patterns: adynamic ureteral segment, stenotic ureteric ring and pseudoureterocelic orifice. We performed HPBD in 30 patients over 6 years. We had 23 patients with adynamic distal ureteral segment (type 1), 4 with stenotic ring (type 2) and 3 with ureterocelic orifice (type 3). In 3 patients (10%) the guidewire did not easily pass into the ureter requiring ureteral stenting or papillotomy. Post-operative course was uneventful. Five patients (3 pseudoureterocelic) required open surgery during follow-up. HPBD for the treatment of POM is a safe and feasible procedure and it can be a definitive treatment of POM. Complications are mainly due to double J stent and none of our patients had symptoms related to vescico-ureteral reflux. The aspect of the orifice, identified during cystoscopy, seems to correlate with the efficacy of the dilatation: type 1 and 2 are associated with good and excellent results respectively; type 3 do not permit dilatation in almost all cases requiring papillotomy. HPBD can be performed in selected patients of all paediatric ages as first therapeutic line. The presence of a pseudoureterocelic orifice or long stenosis might interfere with the ureteral stenting and seems associated with worse outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35535,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatria Medica e Chirurgica\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4081/pmc.2020.214\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatria Medica e Chirurgica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4081/pmc.2020.214\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatria Medica e Chirurgica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/pmc.2020.214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

原发性梗阻性肾积水(POM)是儿童肾积水的常见原因,大多数情况下自发性消退。高压球囊扩张术(HPBD)已被建议作为一种微创手术,用于特定患者的POM矫正。本文的目的是回顾我们在POM患者中应用HPBD的经验。我们在单个中心进行了回顾性研究,收集了患者人口统计学、诊断方式、手术细节、结果和随访的数据。特别是,内窥镜方面的孔道允许识别3种模式:动态输尿管段,狭窄输尿管环和假输尿管输尿管孔道。我们在6年内对30例患者进行了HPBD。我们有23例输尿管远端段不动(1型),4例狭窄环(2型),3例输尿管囊囊口(3型)。在3例(10%)患者中,导丝不易进入输尿管,需要输尿管支架置入或乳头切开术。术后过程平淡无奇。随访期间,5例患者(3例假性输尿管囊肿)需要开腹手术。HPBD治疗POM是一种安全可行的方法,可以作为POM的最终治疗方法。并发症主要由双J支架引起,本组患者均无膀胱输尿管反流相关症状。在膀胱镜检查中确定的孔口的外观似乎与扩张的效果相关:1型和2型分别与良好和优异的结果相关;在几乎所有需要乳头切开术的病例中,3型不允许扩张。HPBD可以在所有儿科年龄的选定患者中作为第一治疗线进行。假性输尿管输尿管孔或较长的狭窄可能干扰输尿管支架置入,似乎与较差的结果有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
High-pressure balloon dilatation in children: our results in 30 patients with POM and the implications of the cystoscopic evaluation.

Primary Obstructive Megaureter (POM) is a common cause of hydronephrosis in children with spontaneous resolution in most cases. High-Pressure Balloon Dilatation (HPBD) has been proposed as a minimally invasive procedure for POM correction in selected patients. The aim of the paper is to review our experience with HPBD in patients with POM. We performed a retrospective study in a single Centre collecting data on patients' demographics, diagnostic modalities, surgical details, results and follow-up. In particular, the endoscopic aspect of the orifice permitted the identification of 3 patterns: adynamic ureteral segment, stenotic ureteric ring and pseudoureterocelic orifice. We performed HPBD in 30 patients over 6 years. We had 23 patients with adynamic distal ureteral segment (type 1), 4 with stenotic ring (type 2) and 3 with ureterocelic orifice (type 3). In 3 patients (10%) the guidewire did not easily pass into the ureter requiring ureteral stenting or papillotomy. Post-operative course was uneventful. Five patients (3 pseudoureterocelic) required open surgery during follow-up. HPBD for the treatment of POM is a safe and feasible procedure and it can be a definitive treatment of POM. Complications are mainly due to double J stent and none of our patients had symptoms related to vescico-ureteral reflux. The aspect of the orifice, identified during cystoscopy, seems to correlate with the efficacy of the dilatation: type 1 and 2 are associated with good and excellent results respectively; type 3 do not permit dilatation in almost all cases requiring papillotomy. HPBD can be performed in selected patients of all paediatric ages as first therapeutic line. The presence of a pseudoureterocelic orifice or long stenosis might interfere with the ureteral stenting and seems associated with worse outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatria Medica e Chirurgica
Pediatria Medica e Chirurgica Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信