人工智能患者数据共享:伦理挑战,天主教解决方案。

The Linacre Quarterly Pub Date : 2020-11-01 Epub Date: 2020-05-15 DOI:10.1177/0024363920922690
Jean Baric-Parker, Emily E Anderson
{"title":"人工智能患者数据共享:伦理挑战,天主教解决方案。","authors":"Jean Baric-Parker,&nbsp;Emily E Anderson","doi":"10.1177/0024363920922690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent news of Catholic and secular healthcare systems sharing electronic health record (EHR) data with technology companies for the purposes of developing artificial intelligence (AI) applications has drawn attention to the ethical and social challenges of such collaborations, including threats to patient privacy and confidentiality, undermining of patient consent, and lack of corporate transparency. Although the United States Catholic Conference of Bishops' <i>Ethical and Religious Directives for Health Care Services</i> (<i>ERDs</i>) address collaborations between US Catholic healthcare providers and other entities, the <i>ERDs</i> do not adequately address the novel concerns seen in EHR data-sharing for AI development. Neither does the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) privacy rule. This article describes ethical and social problems observed in recent patient data-sharing collaborations with AI companies and analyzes them in light of the guiding principles of the <i>ERDs</i> as well as the 2020 <i>Rome Call to AI Ethics</i> (<i>RCAIE</i>) document recently released by the Vatican. While both the <i>ERDs</i> and <i>RCAIE</i> guiding principles can inform future collaborations, we suggest that the next revision of the <i>ERDs</i> should consider addressing data-sharing and AI more directly.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Electronic health record data-sharing with artificial intelligence developers presents unique ethical and social challenges that can be addressed with updated United States Catholic Conference of Bishops' <i>Ethical and Religious Directives</i> and guidance from the Vatican's 2020 <i>Rome Call to AI Ethics</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":505854,"journal":{"name":"The Linacre Quarterly","volume":"87 4","pages":"471-481"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0024363920922690","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient Data-Sharing for AI: Ethical Challenges, Catholic Solutions.\",\"authors\":\"Jean Baric-Parker,&nbsp;Emily E Anderson\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0024363920922690\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Recent news of Catholic and secular healthcare systems sharing electronic health record (EHR) data with technology companies for the purposes of developing artificial intelligence (AI) applications has drawn attention to the ethical and social challenges of such collaborations, including threats to patient privacy and confidentiality, undermining of patient consent, and lack of corporate transparency. Although the United States Catholic Conference of Bishops' <i>Ethical and Religious Directives for Health Care Services</i> (<i>ERDs</i>) address collaborations between US Catholic healthcare providers and other entities, the <i>ERDs</i> do not adequately address the novel concerns seen in EHR data-sharing for AI development. Neither does the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) privacy rule. This article describes ethical and social problems observed in recent patient data-sharing collaborations with AI companies and analyzes them in light of the guiding principles of the <i>ERDs</i> as well as the 2020 <i>Rome Call to AI Ethics</i> (<i>RCAIE</i>) document recently released by the Vatican. While both the <i>ERDs</i> and <i>RCAIE</i> guiding principles can inform future collaborations, we suggest that the next revision of the <i>ERDs</i> should consider addressing data-sharing and AI more directly.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Electronic health record data-sharing with artificial intelligence developers presents unique ethical and social challenges that can be addressed with updated United States Catholic Conference of Bishops' <i>Ethical and Religious Directives</i> and guidance from the Vatican's 2020 <i>Rome Call to AI Ethics</i>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":505854,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Linacre Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"87 4\",\"pages\":\"471-481\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0024363920922690\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Linacre Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0024363920922690\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/5/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Linacre Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0024363920922690","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/5/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

最近有消息称,天主教和世俗医疗保健系统与技术公司共享电子健康记录(EHR)数据,以开发人工智能(AI)应用程序,这引起了人们对这种合作的伦理和社会挑战的关注,包括对患者隐私和机密性的威胁,破坏患者同意,以及缺乏企业透明度。尽管美国天主教主教会议关于医疗保健服务的伦理和宗教指令(ERDs)解决了美国天主教医疗保健提供者与其他实体之间的合作问题,但ERDs并没有充分解决人工智能开发中电子病历数据共享中出现的新问题。《健康保险流通与责任法案》(HIPAA)的隐私规则也没有。本文描述了在最近与人工智能公司的患者数据共享合作中观察到的伦理和社会问题,并根据ERDs的指导原则以及梵蒂冈最近发布的2020年人工智能伦理罗马呼吁(RCAIE)文件进行了分析。虽然erd和RCAIE指导原则都可以为未来的合作提供信息,但我们建议erd的下一次修订应考虑更直接地解决数据共享和人工智能问题。摘要:与人工智能开发人员共享电子健康记录数据带来了独特的伦理和社会挑战,这些挑战可以通过更新的美国天主教主教会议伦理和宗教指令以及梵蒂冈2020年对人工智能伦理的罗马呼吁的指导来解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patient Data-Sharing for AI: Ethical Challenges, Catholic Solutions.

Recent news of Catholic and secular healthcare systems sharing electronic health record (EHR) data with technology companies for the purposes of developing artificial intelligence (AI) applications has drawn attention to the ethical and social challenges of such collaborations, including threats to patient privacy and confidentiality, undermining of patient consent, and lack of corporate transparency. Although the United States Catholic Conference of Bishops' Ethical and Religious Directives for Health Care Services (ERDs) address collaborations between US Catholic healthcare providers and other entities, the ERDs do not adequately address the novel concerns seen in EHR data-sharing for AI development. Neither does the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) privacy rule. This article describes ethical and social problems observed in recent patient data-sharing collaborations with AI companies and analyzes them in light of the guiding principles of the ERDs as well as the 2020 Rome Call to AI Ethics (RCAIE) document recently released by the Vatican. While both the ERDs and RCAIE guiding principles can inform future collaborations, we suggest that the next revision of the ERDs should consider addressing data-sharing and AI more directly.

Summary: Electronic health record data-sharing with artificial intelligence developers presents unique ethical and social challenges that can be addressed with updated United States Catholic Conference of Bishops' Ethical and Religious Directives and guidance from the Vatican's 2020 Rome Call to AI Ethics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信