涉及急诊医师的医疗事故索赔特征。

Q3 Medicine
Laura C Myers, Jonathan Einbinder, Carlos A Camargo, Emily L Aaronson
{"title":"涉及急诊医师的医疗事故索赔特征。","authors":"Laura C Myers,&nbsp;Jonathan Einbinder,&nbsp;Carlos A Camargo,&nbsp;Emily L Aaronson","doi":"10.1002/jhrm.21450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Identifying characteristics of malpractice claims involving emergency medicine (EM) physicians allows leaders to develop patient safety initiatives to prevent future harm events.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was performed of paid/unpaid claims closed 2007 to 2016 from Comparative Benchmarking System. Claims were identified by physician specialty involved (EM, internal medicine, general surgery). Various characteristics were compared by physician specialty. Multivariable regression was performed to identify factors associated with claim payment, in which (1) physician specialty was included as a predictor and (2) only the subset involving EM physicians was analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 54,772 claims, 2760 involved EM physicians, 5886 involved internists, and 3207 involved surgeons. Death was the most common severity among EM claims (34%). Diagnosis-related allegations accounted for 58%, higher than 42% and 11% of claims involving internists and surgeons, respectively (P < 0.0001). Thirty-one percent was paid. The median indemnity paid on behalf of any defendant was $206,261 (interquartile range $55,065-527,651). The most common final diagnoses were myocardial infarction (2%), pulmonary embolus (2%), and cardiac arrest (2%). Procedure-related claims were associated with increased payment likelihood (odds ratio 1.21, 95% confidence interval 1.10-1.34).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Malpractice claims in EM are often diagnosis- or procedure related. Our findings suggest that diagnostic accuracy and procedural competency should shape future quality improvement work.</p>","PeriodicalId":39819,"journal":{"name":"Journal of healthcare risk management : the journal of the American Society for Healthcare Risk Management","volume":"41 1","pages":"9-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/jhrm.21450","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characteristics of medical malpractice claims involving emergency medicine physicians.\",\"authors\":\"Laura C Myers,&nbsp;Jonathan Einbinder,&nbsp;Carlos A Camargo,&nbsp;Emily L Aaronson\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jhrm.21450\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Identifying characteristics of malpractice claims involving emergency medicine (EM) physicians allows leaders to develop patient safety initiatives to prevent future harm events.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was performed of paid/unpaid claims closed 2007 to 2016 from Comparative Benchmarking System. Claims were identified by physician specialty involved (EM, internal medicine, general surgery). Various characteristics were compared by physician specialty. Multivariable regression was performed to identify factors associated with claim payment, in which (1) physician specialty was included as a predictor and (2) only the subset involving EM physicians was analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 54,772 claims, 2760 involved EM physicians, 5886 involved internists, and 3207 involved surgeons. Death was the most common severity among EM claims (34%). Diagnosis-related allegations accounted for 58%, higher than 42% and 11% of claims involving internists and surgeons, respectively (P < 0.0001). Thirty-one percent was paid. The median indemnity paid on behalf of any defendant was $206,261 (interquartile range $55,065-527,651). The most common final diagnoses were myocardial infarction (2%), pulmonary embolus (2%), and cardiac arrest (2%). Procedure-related claims were associated with increased payment likelihood (odds ratio 1.21, 95% confidence interval 1.10-1.34).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Malpractice claims in EM are often diagnosis- or procedure related. Our findings suggest that diagnostic accuracy and procedural competency should shape future quality improvement work.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39819,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of healthcare risk management : the journal of the American Society for Healthcare Risk Management\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"9-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/jhrm.21450\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of healthcare risk management : the journal of the American Society for Healthcare Risk Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jhrm.21450\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/10/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of healthcare risk management : the journal of the American Society for Healthcare Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jhrm.21450","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/10/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

背景:识别涉及急诊医学(EM)医生的医疗事故索赔的特征,使领导者能够制定患者安全举措,以防止未来的伤害事件。方法:对比较基准系统2007 - 2016年已付/未付索赔进行回顾性研究。索赔由所涉及的医师专业(EM,内科,普通外科)确定。按医师专科比较各项特征。进行多变量回归以确定与索赔支付相关的因素,其中(1)将医生专业作为预测因子,(2)仅分析涉及EM医生的子集。结果:在54,772例索赔中,2760例涉及急诊医生,5886例涉及内科医生,3207例涉及外科医生。死亡是EM索赔中最常见的严重程度(34%)。诊断相关指控占58%,分别高于内科医生和外科医生索赔的42%和11% (P < 0.0001)。支付了31%。代表被告支付的赔偿中位数为206,261美元(四分位数范围为55,065-527,651美元)。最常见的最终诊断是心肌梗死(2%)、肺栓塞(2%)和心脏骤停(2%)。手术相关索赔与赔付可能性增加相关(优势比1.21,95%置信区间1.10-1.34)。结论:急诊医疗事故索赔通常与诊断或手术有关。我们的研究结果表明,诊断的准确性和程序能力应该塑造未来的质量改进工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Characteristics of medical malpractice claims involving emergency medicine physicians.

Background: Identifying characteristics of malpractice claims involving emergency medicine (EM) physicians allows leaders to develop patient safety initiatives to prevent future harm events.

Methods: A retrospective study was performed of paid/unpaid claims closed 2007 to 2016 from Comparative Benchmarking System. Claims were identified by physician specialty involved (EM, internal medicine, general surgery). Various characteristics were compared by physician specialty. Multivariable regression was performed to identify factors associated with claim payment, in which (1) physician specialty was included as a predictor and (2) only the subset involving EM physicians was analyzed.

Results: Of 54,772 claims, 2760 involved EM physicians, 5886 involved internists, and 3207 involved surgeons. Death was the most common severity among EM claims (34%). Diagnosis-related allegations accounted for 58%, higher than 42% and 11% of claims involving internists and surgeons, respectively (P < 0.0001). Thirty-one percent was paid. The median indemnity paid on behalf of any defendant was $206,261 (interquartile range $55,065-527,651). The most common final diagnoses were myocardial infarction (2%), pulmonary embolus (2%), and cardiac arrest (2%). Procedure-related claims were associated with increased payment likelihood (odds ratio 1.21, 95% confidence interval 1.10-1.34).

Conclusion: Malpractice claims in EM are often diagnosis- or procedure related. Our findings suggest that diagnostic accuracy and procedural competency should shape future quality improvement work.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: The Journal of Healthcare Risk Management is published quarterly by the American Society for Healthcare Risk Management (ASHRM). The purpose of the journal is to publish research, trends, and new developments in the field of healthcare risk management with the ultimate goal of advancing safe and trusted patient-centered healthcare delivery and promoting proactive and innovative management of organization-wide risk. The journal focuses on insightful, peer-reviewed content that relates to patient safety, emergency preparedness, insurance, legal, leadership, and other timely healthcare risk management issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信