CME认证代表什么?

Reinhard Griebenow, Peter Mills, Joerg Stein
{"title":"CME认证代表什么?","authors":"Reinhard Griebenow, Peter Mills, Joerg Stein","doi":"10.1080/21614083.2020.1822665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Independence has been top of the agenda of accrediting bodies worldwide for many years and has just recently been aligned in a consensus document [1] adopted by major accrediting bodies. Furthermore, independence from any undue third-party influence has also been a top criterion to be assessed in the accreditation process. As a result, currently accrediting bodies demand that faculty should be carefully selected, in particular with regard to competing interests, and representatives of commercial interests can at no point take a role in continuing medical education(CME). Nevertheless, the Marburger Bund (MB) position paper on the independence of CME [2] reminds us that aiming at the independence of CME needs to take a holistic view of all the factors which have an impact on items relevant to CME and its outcome. Though this position paper relates to a German background, it addresses some issues of general importance for medical education in general, and CME accreditation in particular:","PeriodicalId":87300,"journal":{"name":"Journal of European CME","volume":"9 1","pages":"1822665"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21614083.2020.1822665","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What Does CME Accreditation Stand for?\",\"authors\":\"Reinhard Griebenow, Peter Mills, Joerg Stein\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21614083.2020.1822665\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Independence has been top of the agenda of accrediting bodies worldwide for many years and has just recently been aligned in a consensus document [1] adopted by major accrediting bodies. Furthermore, independence from any undue third-party influence has also been a top criterion to be assessed in the accreditation process. As a result, currently accrediting bodies demand that faculty should be carefully selected, in particular with regard to competing interests, and representatives of commercial interests can at no point take a role in continuing medical education(CME). Nevertheless, the Marburger Bund (MB) position paper on the independence of CME [2] reminds us that aiming at the independence of CME needs to take a holistic view of all the factors which have an impact on items relevant to CME and its outcome. Though this position paper relates to a German background, it addresses some issues of general importance for medical education in general, and CME accreditation in particular:\",\"PeriodicalId\":87300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of European CME\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"1822665\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21614083.2020.1822665\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of European CME\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21614083.2020.1822665\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of European CME","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21614083.2020.1822665","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What Does CME Accreditation Stand for?
Independence has been top of the agenda of accrediting bodies worldwide for many years and has just recently been aligned in a consensus document [1] adopted by major accrediting bodies. Furthermore, independence from any undue third-party influence has also been a top criterion to be assessed in the accreditation process. As a result, currently accrediting bodies demand that faculty should be carefully selected, in particular with regard to competing interests, and representatives of commercial interests can at no point take a role in continuing medical education(CME). Nevertheless, the Marburger Bund (MB) position paper on the independence of CME [2] reminds us that aiming at the independence of CME needs to take a holistic view of all the factors which have an impact on items relevant to CME and its outcome. Though this position paper relates to a German background, it addresses some issues of general importance for medical education in general, and CME accreditation in particular:
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信