从梦境中醒来:阿片类药物成瘾的急骤性和对再分配药物治疗的支持。

Q3 Social Sciences
Journal of Drug Policy Analysis Pub Date : 2019-06-01 Epub Date: 2020-05-18 DOI:10.1515/jdpa-2019-0010
David Chavanne, Kimberly Goodyear
{"title":"从梦境中醒来:阿片类药物成瘾的急骤性和对再分配药物治疗的支持。","authors":"David Chavanne,&nbsp;Kimberly Goodyear","doi":"10.1515/jdpa-2019-0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Motivated by the historical components of the ongoing U.S. opioid epidemic, this study examines how public support for redistributive drug treatment changes with awareness that someone's opioid addiction started with a legally acquired prescription. Using different versions of a vignette, we vary in a randomized design whether someone's addiction to painkillers started with a legally acquired prescription or with the decision to take pills from a friend. After reading the vignette, participants expressed their level of support for a policy that uses income redistribution to fund a program that provides the person in the vignette with drug treatment. We find that participants are less likely to support redistributive drug treatment when a prescription precipitates the addiction. The results imply that emphasizing the medical establishment's role in the opioid epidemic may actually make people less likely to favor using redistributive drug treatment to provide support.</p>","PeriodicalId":38436,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Drug Policy Analysis","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/jdpa-2019-0010","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Waking Up from Dreamland: Opioid Addiction Precipitance and Support for Redistributive Drug Treatment.\",\"authors\":\"David Chavanne,&nbsp;Kimberly Goodyear\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/jdpa-2019-0010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Motivated by the historical components of the ongoing U.S. opioid epidemic, this study examines how public support for redistributive drug treatment changes with awareness that someone's opioid addiction started with a legally acquired prescription. Using different versions of a vignette, we vary in a randomized design whether someone's addiction to painkillers started with a legally acquired prescription or with the decision to take pills from a friend. After reading the vignette, participants expressed their level of support for a policy that uses income redistribution to fund a program that provides the person in the vignette with drug treatment. We find that participants are less likely to support redistributive drug treatment when a prescription precipitates the addiction. The results imply that emphasizing the medical establishment's role in the opioid epidemic may actually make people less likely to favor using redistributive drug treatment to provide support.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38436,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Drug Policy Analysis\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/jdpa-2019-0010\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Drug Policy Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/jdpa-2019-0010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/5/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Drug Policy Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jdpa-2019-0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/5/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

受美国阿片类药物流行的历史因素的影响,本研究调查了公众对再分配药物治疗的支持如何随着意识到某人的阿片类药物成瘾始于合法获得的处方而变化。使用不同版本的小插图,我们在随机设计中改变了一个人对止痛药成瘾是开始于合法获得的处方还是决定从朋友那里服用药物。在阅读了小短文后,参与者表达了他们对一项政策的支持程度,该政策利用收入再分配来资助一个项目,为小短文中的人提供药物治疗。我们发现,当处方沉淀成瘾时,参与者不太可能支持再分配药物治疗。结果表明,强调医疗机构在阿片类药物流行中的作用实际上可能会使人们不太倾向于使用再分配药物治疗来提供支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Waking Up from Dreamland: Opioid Addiction Precipitance and Support for Redistributive Drug Treatment.

Waking Up from Dreamland: Opioid Addiction Precipitance and Support for Redistributive Drug Treatment.

Motivated by the historical components of the ongoing U.S. opioid epidemic, this study examines how public support for redistributive drug treatment changes with awareness that someone's opioid addiction started with a legally acquired prescription. Using different versions of a vignette, we vary in a randomized design whether someone's addiction to painkillers started with a legally acquired prescription or with the decision to take pills from a friend. After reading the vignette, participants expressed their level of support for a policy that uses income redistribution to fund a program that provides the person in the vignette with drug treatment. We find that participants are less likely to support redistributive drug treatment when a prescription precipitates the addiction. The results imply that emphasizing the medical establishment's role in the opioid epidemic may actually make people less likely to favor using redistributive drug treatment to provide support.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Drug Policy Analysis
Journal of Drug Policy Analysis Social Sciences-Health (social science)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信