吻合前补充停搏液输注对长缺血时间心脏移植患者的影响。

Q3 Medicine
Hong Rae Kim, Sung-Ho Jung, Junho Yang, Min Su Kim, Tae-Jin Yun, Jae-Joong Kim, Jae Won Lee
{"title":"吻合前补充停搏液输注对长缺血时间心脏移植患者的影响。","authors":"Hong Rae Kim,&nbsp;Sung-Ho Jung,&nbsp;Junho Yang,&nbsp;Min Su Kim,&nbsp;Tae-Jin Yun,&nbsp;Jae-Joong Kim,&nbsp;Jae Won Lee","doi":"10.5090/kjtcs.19.091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prolonged ischemic time is a risk factor for primary graft dysfunction in patients who undergo heart transplantation. We investigated the effect of a supplemental cardioplegia infusion before anastomosis in patients with long ischemic times.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified 236 consecutive patients who underwent orthotopic heart transplantation between February 2010 and December 2014. Among them, the patients with total ischemic times of longer than 3 hours (n=59) were categorized based on whether they were administered a complementary cardioplegia solution (CPS) immediately before implantation (CPS+, n=30; CPS-, n=29).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean total ischemic times in the CPS+ and CPS- groups were 238.1±30.1 minutes and 230.1±28.2 minutes, respectively (p=0.3). The incidence of left ventricular primary graft dysfunction (CPS+, n=6 [20.0%]; CPS-, n=5 [17.2%]; p=0.79) was comparable between the groups. In the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, no significant difference in overall survival at 5 years was observed between the CPS+ and CPS- groups (83.1%±6.9% vs. 89.7%±5.7%, respectively; log-rank p=0.7). No inter-group differences in early mortality (CPS+, n=0; CPS-, n=1 [3.4%]; p=0.98) or complications were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The additional infusion of a cardioplegia solution immediately before implantation in patients with longer ischemic times is a simple, reproducible, and safe procedure. However, we did not observe benefits of this strategy in the present study.</p>","PeriodicalId":38678,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":"53 6","pages":"375-380"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/dd/6c/KJTCV-53-375.PMC7721527.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Supplemental Cardioplegia Infusion before Anastomosis in Patients Undergoing Heart Transplantation with Long Ischemic Times.\",\"authors\":\"Hong Rae Kim,&nbsp;Sung-Ho Jung,&nbsp;Junho Yang,&nbsp;Min Su Kim,&nbsp;Tae-Jin Yun,&nbsp;Jae-Joong Kim,&nbsp;Jae Won Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.5090/kjtcs.19.091\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prolonged ischemic time is a risk factor for primary graft dysfunction in patients who undergo heart transplantation. We investigated the effect of a supplemental cardioplegia infusion before anastomosis in patients with long ischemic times.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified 236 consecutive patients who underwent orthotopic heart transplantation between February 2010 and December 2014. Among them, the patients with total ischemic times of longer than 3 hours (n=59) were categorized based on whether they were administered a complementary cardioplegia solution (CPS) immediately before implantation (CPS+, n=30; CPS-, n=29).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean total ischemic times in the CPS+ and CPS- groups were 238.1±30.1 minutes and 230.1±28.2 minutes, respectively (p=0.3). The incidence of left ventricular primary graft dysfunction (CPS+, n=6 [20.0%]; CPS-, n=5 [17.2%]; p=0.79) was comparable between the groups. In the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, no significant difference in overall survival at 5 years was observed between the CPS+ and CPS- groups (83.1%±6.9% vs. 89.7%±5.7%, respectively; log-rank p=0.7). No inter-group differences in early mortality (CPS+, n=0; CPS-, n=1 [3.4%]; p=0.98) or complications were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The additional infusion of a cardioplegia solution immediately before implantation in patients with longer ischemic times is a simple, reproducible, and safe procedure. However, we did not observe benefits of this strategy in the present study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38678,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"volume\":\"53 6\",\"pages\":\"375-380\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/dd/6c/KJTCV-53-375.PMC7721527.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5090/kjtcs.19.091\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5090/kjtcs.19.091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:缺血时间延长是心脏移植患者原发性移植物功能障碍的危险因素。我们研究了吻合前补充停搏液输注对缺血时间过长的患者的影响。方法:我们选取了2010年2月至2014年12月期间连续接受原位心脏移植的236例患者。其中,总缺血时间大于3小时的患者(n=59)根据是否在植入前立即给予补心停搏液(CPS+, n=30;CPS - n = 29)。结果:CPS+组和CPS-组的平均总缺血时间分别为238.1±30.1 min和230.1±28.2 min (p=0.3)。左心室原发性移植物功能障碍发生率(CPS+, n=6 [20.0%];CPS-, n=5 [17.2%];P =0.79)组间具有可比性。在Kaplan-Meier生存分析中,CPS+组和CPS-组的5年总生存率无显著差异(分别为83.1%±6.9%和89.7%±5.7%;log-rank p = 0.7)。早期死亡率组间无差异(CPS+, n=0;CPS-, n=1 [3.4%];P =0.98)或出现并发症。结论:对于缺血时间较长的患者,在植入前立即输液停搏液是一种简单、可重复且安全的方法。然而,在目前的研究中,我们没有观察到这种策略的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The Effect of Supplemental Cardioplegia Infusion before Anastomosis in Patients Undergoing Heart Transplantation with Long Ischemic Times.

The Effect of Supplemental Cardioplegia Infusion before Anastomosis in Patients Undergoing Heart Transplantation with Long Ischemic Times.

The Effect of Supplemental Cardioplegia Infusion before Anastomosis in Patients Undergoing Heart Transplantation with Long Ischemic Times.

Background: Prolonged ischemic time is a risk factor for primary graft dysfunction in patients who undergo heart transplantation. We investigated the effect of a supplemental cardioplegia infusion before anastomosis in patients with long ischemic times.

Methods: We identified 236 consecutive patients who underwent orthotopic heart transplantation between February 2010 and December 2014. Among them, the patients with total ischemic times of longer than 3 hours (n=59) were categorized based on whether they were administered a complementary cardioplegia solution (CPS) immediately before implantation (CPS+, n=30; CPS-, n=29).

Results: The mean total ischemic times in the CPS+ and CPS- groups were 238.1±30.1 minutes and 230.1±28.2 minutes, respectively (p=0.3). The incidence of left ventricular primary graft dysfunction (CPS+, n=6 [20.0%]; CPS-, n=5 [17.2%]; p=0.79) was comparable between the groups. In the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, no significant difference in overall survival at 5 years was observed between the CPS+ and CPS- groups (83.1%±6.9% vs. 89.7%±5.7%, respectively; log-rank p=0.7). No inter-group differences in early mortality (CPS+, n=0; CPS-, n=1 [3.4%]; p=0.98) or complications were observed.

Conclusion: The additional infusion of a cardioplegia solution immediately before implantation in patients with longer ischemic times is a simple, reproducible, and safe procedure. However, we did not observe benefits of this strategy in the present study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信