Amir Ahmadzadeh Amiri , Kasra Karvandian , Mohammad Ashouri , Mojgan Rahimi , Ali Ahmadzadeh Amiri
{"title":"静脉麻醉与吸入麻醉对开腹术后恶心呕吐的比较:一项随机临床研究","authors":"Amir Ahmadzadeh Amiri , Kasra Karvandian , Mohammad Ashouri , Mojgan Rahimi , Ali Ahmadzadeh Amiri","doi":"10.1016/j.bjan.2020.04.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV) is a multifactorial surgical complication with an unclear underlying cause. Anesthetic methods, patients’ characteristics and the type of surgery are considered as factors affecting PONV. This study was designed to compare the effect of inhalational and intravenous anesthesia in abdominal surgery on the incidence and severity of PONV.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A single‐blinded prospective randomized clinical trial on 105 patients aged 18<!--> <!-->−<!--> <!-->65 years was carried out. Patients were divided in two groups of Total Intravenous Anesthesia (TIVA) and Inhalational anesthesia. The incidence and severity of PONV were examined at 0, 2, 6, 12, and 24<!--> <!-->hours after the surgery. The use of a rescue antiemetic was also evaluated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Fifty point nine percent of the patients in the inhalation group and 17.3% of the patients in the intravenous group developed PONV (<em>p</em> <<!--> <!-->0.001). The incidence of vomiting was reported in 11.3% of the Inhalational group and 3.8% of the TIVA group (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.15), and 24.5% of patients in the Inhalation group and 9.6% of patients in the intravenous group needed an antiemetic medication (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.043).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting and the need for administration of an antiemetic rescue drug, and the severity of nausea in patients were significantly lower in the TIVA group.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21261,"journal":{"name":"Revista brasileira de anestesiologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bjan.2020.04.019","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparação entre anestesia intravenosa e inalatória na náusea e vômito pós‐operatórios em laparotomia: estudo clínico randomizado\",\"authors\":\"Amir Ahmadzadeh Amiri , Kasra Karvandian , Mohammad Ashouri , Mojgan Rahimi , Ali Ahmadzadeh Amiri\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bjan.2020.04.019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV) is a multifactorial surgical complication with an unclear underlying cause. Anesthetic methods, patients’ characteristics and the type of surgery are considered as factors affecting PONV. This study was designed to compare the effect of inhalational and intravenous anesthesia in abdominal surgery on the incidence and severity of PONV.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A single‐blinded prospective randomized clinical trial on 105 patients aged 18<!--> <!-->−<!--> <!-->65 years was carried out. Patients were divided in two groups of Total Intravenous Anesthesia (TIVA) and Inhalational anesthesia. The incidence and severity of PONV were examined at 0, 2, 6, 12, and 24<!--> <!-->hours after the surgery. The use of a rescue antiemetic was also evaluated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Fifty point nine percent of the patients in the inhalation group and 17.3% of the patients in the intravenous group developed PONV (<em>p</em> <<!--> <!-->0.001). The incidence of vomiting was reported in 11.3% of the Inhalational group and 3.8% of the TIVA group (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.15), and 24.5% of patients in the Inhalation group and 9.6% of patients in the intravenous group needed an antiemetic medication (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.043).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting and the need for administration of an antiemetic rescue drug, and the severity of nausea in patients were significantly lower in the TIVA group.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21261,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista brasileira de anestesiologia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bjan.2020.04.019\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista brasileira de anestesiologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034709420304049\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista brasileira de anestesiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034709420304049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparação entre anestesia intravenosa e inalatória na náusea e vômito pós‐operatórios em laparotomia: estudo clínico randomizado
Background
Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV) is a multifactorial surgical complication with an unclear underlying cause. Anesthetic methods, patients’ characteristics and the type of surgery are considered as factors affecting PONV. This study was designed to compare the effect of inhalational and intravenous anesthesia in abdominal surgery on the incidence and severity of PONV.
Methods
A single‐blinded prospective randomized clinical trial on 105 patients aged 18 − 65 years was carried out. Patients were divided in two groups of Total Intravenous Anesthesia (TIVA) and Inhalational anesthesia. The incidence and severity of PONV were examined at 0, 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours after the surgery. The use of a rescue antiemetic was also evaluated.
Results
Fifty point nine percent of the patients in the inhalation group and 17.3% of the patients in the intravenous group developed PONV (p < 0.001). The incidence of vomiting was reported in 11.3% of the Inhalational group and 3.8% of the TIVA group (p = 0.15), and 24.5% of patients in the Inhalation group and 9.6% of patients in the intravenous group needed an antiemetic medication (p = 0.043).
Conclusion
The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting and the need for administration of an antiemetic rescue drug, and the severity of nausea in patients were significantly lower in the TIVA group.
期刊介绍:
The Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology is the official journal of the Brazilian Anesthesiology Society. It publishes articles classified into the following categories:
-Scientific articles (clinical or experimental trials)-
Clinical information (case reports)-
Reviews-
Letters to the Editor-
Editorials.
The journal focuses primarily on clinical trials, with scope on clinical practice, aiming at providing applied tools to the anesthesiologist and critical care physician.
The Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology accepts articles exclusively forwarded to it. Articles already published in other journals are not accepted. All articles proposed for publication are previously submitted to the analysis of two or more members of the Editorial Board or other specialized consultants.