水杨花和拉芬花植物提取物对黄鼠狼和黄鼠狼蛇毒局部作用的研究。

Journal of Venom Research Pub Date : 2020-07-20 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01
Raphael Schezaro-Ramos, Rita C Collaço, José C Cogo, Cháriston A Dal-Belo, Léa Rodrigues-Simioni, Thalita Rocha, Priscila Randazzo-Moura
{"title":"水杨花和拉芬花植物提取物对黄鼠狼和黄鼠狼蛇毒局部作用的研究。","authors":"Raphael Schezaro-Ramos,&nbsp;Rita C Collaço,&nbsp;José C Cogo,&nbsp;Cháriston A Dal-Belo,&nbsp;Léa Rodrigues-Simioni,&nbsp;Thalita Rocha,&nbsp;Priscila Randazzo-Moura","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Philodryas olfersii</i> produces similar local effects to <i>Bothrops jararacussu</i> snakebite, which can induce misidentification and bothropic antivenom administration. Antivenom therapy is effective, but has its limitations regarding local damage. Since plants are used in folk medicine to treat snakebite victims, we evaluated the protective properties of <i>Cordia salicifolia</i> and <i>Lafoensia pacari</i> extracts against <i>Philodryas olfersii</i> and <i>Bothrops jararacussu</i> venoms. Preparations pretreated with both extracts inhibited > 90% the <i>B. jararacussu</i> venom-induced neuromuscular blockade, and 52% to 81% the <i>P. olfersii</i> venom-induced blockade. <i>C. salicifolia</i> inhibited the myonecrosis promoted by both venoms; however, <i>L. pacari</i> prevented only the myofilaments hypercontraction. Regarding haemorrhagic activity, <i>C. salicifolia</i> was more effective against <i>B. jararacussu</i> venom, while <i>L. pacari</i> was more effective against <i>P. olfersii</i> venom. On the other hand, for oedema-forming activity the results were the opposite. Considering that both extracts prevented (to different levels) the main manifestations of both snakebites (local symptoms), we endorse further studies involving these plants as coadjuvant in snakebite therapeutics.</p>","PeriodicalId":17653,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Venom Research","volume":"10 ","pages":"32-37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/62/e4/JVR-10-32.PMC7512476.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"<i>Cordia salicifolia</i> and <i>Lafoensia pacari</i> plant extracts against the local effects of <i>Bothrops jararacussu</i> and <i>Philodryas olfersii</i> snake venoms.\",\"authors\":\"Raphael Schezaro-Ramos,&nbsp;Rita C Collaço,&nbsp;José C Cogo,&nbsp;Cháriston A Dal-Belo,&nbsp;Léa Rodrigues-Simioni,&nbsp;Thalita Rocha,&nbsp;Priscila Randazzo-Moura\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Philodryas olfersii</i> produces similar local effects to <i>Bothrops jararacussu</i> snakebite, which can induce misidentification and bothropic antivenom administration. Antivenom therapy is effective, but has its limitations regarding local damage. Since plants are used in folk medicine to treat snakebite victims, we evaluated the protective properties of <i>Cordia salicifolia</i> and <i>Lafoensia pacari</i> extracts against <i>Philodryas olfersii</i> and <i>Bothrops jararacussu</i> venoms. Preparations pretreated with both extracts inhibited > 90% the <i>B. jararacussu</i> venom-induced neuromuscular blockade, and 52% to 81% the <i>P. olfersii</i> venom-induced blockade. <i>C. salicifolia</i> inhibited the myonecrosis promoted by both venoms; however, <i>L. pacari</i> prevented only the myofilaments hypercontraction. Regarding haemorrhagic activity, <i>C. salicifolia</i> was more effective against <i>B. jararacussu</i> venom, while <i>L. pacari</i> was more effective against <i>P. olfersii</i> venom. On the other hand, for oedema-forming activity the results were the opposite. Considering that both extracts prevented (to different levels) the main manifestations of both snakebites (local symptoms), we endorse further studies involving these plants as coadjuvant in snakebite therapeutics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17653,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Venom Research\",\"volume\":\"10 \",\"pages\":\"32-37\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/62/e4/JVR-10-32.PMC7512476.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Venom Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Venom Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在局部产生类似的效果,可引起误认和Bothrops jararacussu抗蛇毒血清给药。抗蛇毒血清治疗是有效的,但对于局部损伤有其局限性。由于植物在民间医学中被用于治疗蛇咬伤受害者,我们评估了水杨花和拉芬沙提取物对蛇咬伤受害者的保护作用。两种提取物预处理后的制剂对黄颡鱼毒诱导的神经肌肉阻断的抑制作用> 90%,对P. olfersii毒液诱导的神经肌肉阻断的抑制作用为52% ~ 81%。水杨花对两种毒液引起的肌坏死均有抑制作用;而柏卡菌仅能抑制肌丝的过度收缩。在出血活性方面,水杨花对黄颡鱼毒有较好的抑制作用,而白颡鱼毒对黄颡鱼毒有较好的抑制作用。另一方面,对于水肿形成活性,结果正好相反。考虑到这两种提取物(在不同程度上)预防了两种蛇咬伤的主要表现(局部症状),我们支持将这些植物作为蛇咬伤治疗的辅助剂进行进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

<i>Cordia salicifolia</i> and <i>Lafoensia pacari</i> plant extracts against the local effects of <i>Bothrops jararacussu</i> and <i>Philodryas olfersii</i> snake venoms.

<i>Cordia salicifolia</i> and <i>Lafoensia pacari</i> plant extracts against the local effects of <i>Bothrops jararacussu</i> and <i>Philodryas olfersii</i> snake venoms.

<i>Cordia salicifolia</i> and <i>Lafoensia pacari</i> plant extracts against the local effects of <i>Bothrops jararacussu</i> and <i>Philodryas olfersii</i> snake venoms.

Cordia salicifolia and Lafoensia pacari plant extracts against the local effects of Bothrops jararacussu and Philodryas olfersii snake venoms.

Philodryas olfersii produces similar local effects to Bothrops jararacussu snakebite, which can induce misidentification and bothropic antivenom administration. Antivenom therapy is effective, but has its limitations regarding local damage. Since plants are used in folk medicine to treat snakebite victims, we evaluated the protective properties of Cordia salicifolia and Lafoensia pacari extracts against Philodryas olfersii and Bothrops jararacussu venoms. Preparations pretreated with both extracts inhibited > 90% the B. jararacussu venom-induced neuromuscular blockade, and 52% to 81% the P. olfersii venom-induced blockade. C. salicifolia inhibited the myonecrosis promoted by both venoms; however, L. pacari prevented only the myofilaments hypercontraction. Regarding haemorrhagic activity, C. salicifolia was more effective against B. jararacussu venom, while L. pacari was more effective against P. olfersii venom. On the other hand, for oedema-forming activity the results were the opposite. Considering that both extracts prevented (to different levels) the main manifestations of both snakebites (local symptoms), we endorse further studies involving these plants as coadjuvant in snakebite therapeutics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信