成人社区获得性肺炎的病因学:系统综述。

IF 8.5 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Pneumonia Pub Date : 2020-10-05 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s41479-020-00074-3
Saeed Shoar, Daniel M Musher
{"title":"成人社区获得性肺炎的病因学:系统综述。","authors":"Saeed Shoar,&nbsp;Daniel M Musher","doi":"10.1186/s41479-020-00074-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The etiology of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) has evolved since the beginning of the antibiotic era. Recent guidelines encourage immediate empiric antibiotic treatment once a diagnosis of CAP is made. Concerns about treatment recommendations, on the one hand, and antibiotic stewardship, on the other, motivated this review of the medical literature on the etiology of CAP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review of English-language literature on the etiology of CAP using methods defined by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We searched PubMed using a combination of the keywords 'pneumonia', 'CAP', 'etiology', 'microbiology', 'bacteriology', and 'pathogen'. We examined articles on antibiotics that were develop to treat pneumonia. We reviewed all 'related articles' as well as studies referenced by those that came up in the search. After we excluded articles that did not give sufficient microbiological data or failed to meet other predetermined criteria, 146 studies remained. Data were stratified into diagnostic categories according to the microbiologic studies that were done; results are presented as the percentage in each category of all cases in which an etiology was established.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong><i>Streptococcus pneumoniae</i> remains the most common cause of CAP although declining in incidence; this decline has been greater in the US than elsewhere. <i>Haemophilus influenzae</i> is the second most common cause of CAP, followed by <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> and Gram negative bacilli. The incidence of all bacteria as causes of CAP has declined because, with routine use of PCR for viruses, the denominator, cases with an established etiology, has increased. Viruses were reported on average in about 10% of cases, but recent PCR-based studies identified a respiratory virus in about 30% of cases of CAP, with substantial rates of viral/bacterial coinfection.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study justify current guidelines for initial empiric treatment of CAP. With pneumococcus and <i>Haemophilus</i> continuing to predominate, efforts at antibiotic stewardship might be enhanced by greater attention to the routine use of sputum Gram stain and culture. Because viral/bacterial coinfection is relatively common, the identification of a virus by PCR does not, by itself, allow for discontinuation of the antibiotic therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":45120,"journal":{"name":"Pneumonia","volume":" ","pages":"11"},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s41479-020-00074-3","citationCount":"71","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Etiology of community-acquired pneumonia in adults: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Saeed Shoar,&nbsp;Daniel M Musher\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s41479-020-00074-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The etiology of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) has evolved since the beginning of the antibiotic era. Recent guidelines encourage immediate empiric antibiotic treatment once a diagnosis of CAP is made. Concerns about treatment recommendations, on the one hand, and antibiotic stewardship, on the other, motivated this review of the medical literature on the etiology of CAP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review of English-language literature on the etiology of CAP using methods defined by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We searched PubMed using a combination of the keywords 'pneumonia', 'CAP', 'etiology', 'microbiology', 'bacteriology', and 'pathogen'. We examined articles on antibiotics that were develop to treat pneumonia. We reviewed all 'related articles' as well as studies referenced by those that came up in the search. After we excluded articles that did not give sufficient microbiological data or failed to meet other predetermined criteria, 146 studies remained. Data were stratified into diagnostic categories according to the microbiologic studies that were done; results are presented as the percentage in each category of all cases in which an etiology was established.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong><i>Streptococcus pneumoniae</i> remains the most common cause of CAP although declining in incidence; this decline has been greater in the US than elsewhere. <i>Haemophilus influenzae</i> is the second most common cause of CAP, followed by <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> and Gram negative bacilli. The incidence of all bacteria as causes of CAP has declined because, with routine use of PCR for viruses, the denominator, cases with an established etiology, has increased. Viruses were reported on average in about 10% of cases, but recent PCR-based studies identified a respiratory virus in about 30% of cases of CAP, with substantial rates of viral/bacterial coinfection.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study justify current guidelines for initial empiric treatment of CAP. With pneumococcus and <i>Haemophilus</i> continuing to predominate, efforts at antibiotic stewardship might be enhanced by greater attention to the routine use of sputum Gram stain and culture. Because viral/bacterial coinfection is relatively common, the identification of a virus by PCR does not, by itself, allow for discontinuation of the antibiotic therapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45120,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pneumonia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s41479-020-00074-3\",\"citationCount\":\"71\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pneumonia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41479-020-00074-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pneumonia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41479-020-00074-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 71

摘要

背景:社区获得性肺炎(CAP)的病因学自抗生素时代开始就发生了变化。最近的指南鼓励一旦确诊为CAP,立即进行经验性抗生素治疗。一方面是对治疗建议的关注,另一方面是对抗生素管理的关注,这促使我们对CAP病因学的医学文献进行了综述。方法:我们使用系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目定义的方法对CAP病因学的英语文献进行了系统综述。我们用“肺炎”、“CAP”、“病原学”、“微生物学”、“细菌学”和“病原体”等关键词组合搜索PubMed。我们研究了有关抗生素治疗肺炎的文章。我们查阅了所有“相关文章”以及搜索中出现的相关研究。在我们排除了没有提供足够微生物学数据或不符合其他预定标准的文章后,还剩下146项研究。根据所做的微生物学研究,将数据分层为诊断类别;结果显示为在每一类病例中确定病因的百分比。结果:肺炎链球菌虽然发病率有所下降,但仍是导致CAP的最常见原因;美国的降幅比其他地区更大。流感嗜血杆菌是CAP的第二大常见病因,其次是金黄色葡萄球菌和革兰氏阴性杆菌。所有细菌作为CAP病因的发生率已经下降,因为常规使用聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测病毒,分母(病原学确定的病例)增加了。据报道,平均约10%的病例中存在病毒,但最近基于pcr的研究发现,约30%的CAP病例中存在呼吸道病毒,病毒/细菌合并感染的比例很高。结论:本研究的结果证明了CAP初始经验性治疗的现行指南是正确的。随着肺炎球菌和嗜血杆菌继续占主导地位,抗生素管理的努力可能会通过更加重视常规使用痰革兰氏染色和培养而得到加强。由于病毒/细菌合并感染相对常见,因此通过聚合酶链反应鉴定病毒本身并不意味着可以停止抗生素治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Etiology of community-acquired pneumonia in adults: a systematic review.

Etiology of community-acquired pneumonia in adults: a systematic review.

Etiology of community-acquired pneumonia in adults: a systematic review.

Etiology of community-acquired pneumonia in adults: a systematic review.

Background: The etiology of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) has evolved since the beginning of the antibiotic era. Recent guidelines encourage immediate empiric antibiotic treatment once a diagnosis of CAP is made. Concerns about treatment recommendations, on the one hand, and antibiotic stewardship, on the other, motivated this review of the medical literature on the etiology of CAP.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review of English-language literature on the etiology of CAP using methods defined by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We searched PubMed using a combination of the keywords 'pneumonia', 'CAP', 'etiology', 'microbiology', 'bacteriology', and 'pathogen'. We examined articles on antibiotics that were develop to treat pneumonia. We reviewed all 'related articles' as well as studies referenced by those that came up in the search. After we excluded articles that did not give sufficient microbiological data or failed to meet other predetermined criteria, 146 studies remained. Data were stratified into diagnostic categories according to the microbiologic studies that were done; results are presented as the percentage in each category of all cases in which an etiology was established.

Results: Streptococcus pneumoniae remains the most common cause of CAP although declining in incidence; this decline has been greater in the US than elsewhere. Haemophilus influenzae is the second most common cause of CAP, followed by Staphylococcus aureus and Gram negative bacilli. The incidence of all bacteria as causes of CAP has declined because, with routine use of PCR for viruses, the denominator, cases with an established etiology, has increased. Viruses were reported on average in about 10% of cases, but recent PCR-based studies identified a respiratory virus in about 30% of cases of CAP, with substantial rates of viral/bacterial coinfection.

Conclusion: The results of this study justify current guidelines for initial empiric treatment of CAP. With pneumococcus and Haemophilus continuing to predominate, efforts at antibiotic stewardship might be enhanced by greater attention to the routine use of sputum Gram stain and culture. Because viral/bacterial coinfection is relatively common, the identification of a virus by PCR does not, by itself, allow for discontinuation of the antibiotic therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pneumonia
Pneumonia RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
自引率
1.50%
发文量
7
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信