基于脓毒症-3定义的脓毒症患者的亚临床左心室收缩功能障碍:斑点跟踪超声心动图研究。

IF 1.8 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Critical Care Research and Practice Pub Date : 2020-09-21 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2020/6098654
Pham Dang Hai, Le Lan Phuong, Nguyen Manh Dung, Le Thi Viet Hoa, Do Van Quyen, Nguyen Xuan Chinh, Vu Duy Minh, Pham Nguyen Son
{"title":"基于脓毒症-3定义的脓毒症患者的亚临床左心室收缩功能障碍:斑点跟踪超声心动图研究。","authors":"Pham Dang Hai,&nbsp;Le Lan Phuong,&nbsp;Nguyen Manh Dung,&nbsp;Le Thi Viet Hoa,&nbsp;Do Van Quyen,&nbsp;Nguyen Xuan Chinh,&nbsp;Vu Duy Minh,&nbsp;Pham Nguyen Son","doi":"10.1155/2020/6098654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Left ventricular dysfunction is quite common in septic shock. Speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE) is a novel, highly sensitive method for assessing left ventricular function, capable of detecting subclinical myocardial dysfunction, which is not identified with conventional echocardiography. We sought to evaluate subclinical left ventricular systolic function in patients with septic shock using speckle-tracking echocardiography.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From May 2017 to December 2018, patients aged ≥18 years admitted to the intensive care unit with the diagnosis of sepsis and septic shock based on the sepsis-3 definition were included. Patients with other causes of cardiac dysfunction were excluded. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed for all the patients within 24 hours of diagnosis. Left ventricular systolic function was assessed using conventional echocardiography and speckle-tracking echocardiography.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with septic shock (<i>n</i> = 90) (study group) and 37 matched patients with sepsis but no septic shock (control group) were included. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) by conventional echocardiography showed no significant difference between two groups (58.2 ± 9.9 vs. 58.6 ± 8.3, <i>p</i>=0.804). The global longitudinal strain (GLS) by STE was significantly reduced in patients with septic shock compared with that in the control (-14.6 ± 3.3 vs. -17.1 ± 3.3, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Based on the cutoff value of GLS ≥ -15% for the definition of subclinical left ventricular systolic dysfunction, this dysfunction was detected in 50 patients with septic shock (55.6%) and in 6 patients in the control group (16.2%) (<i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Speckle-tracking echocardiography can detect early subclinical left ventricular systolic dysfunction via the left ventricular global longitudinal strain compared with conventional echocardiographic parameters in patients with septic shock.</p>","PeriodicalId":46583,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Research and Practice","volume":"2020 ","pages":"6098654"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2020/6098654","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Subclinical Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction in Patients with Septic Shock Based on Sepsis-3 Definition: A Speckle-Tracking Echocardiography Study.\",\"authors\":\"Pham Dang Hai,&nbsp;Le Lan Phuong,&nbsp;Nguyen Manh Dung,&nbsp;Le Thi Viet Hoa,&nbsp;Do Van Quyen,&nbsp;Nguyen Xuan Chinh,&nbsp;Vu Duy Minh,&nbsp;Pham Nguyen Son\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2020/6098654\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Left ventricular dysfunction is quite common in septic shock. Speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE) is a novel, highly sensitive method for assessing left ventricular function, capable of detecting subclinical myocardial dysfunction, which is not identified with conventional echocardiography. We sought to evaluate subclinical left ventricular systolic function in patients with septic shock using speckle-tracking echocardiography.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From May 2017 to December 2018, patients aged ≥18 years admitted to the intensive care unit with the diagnosis of sepsis and septic shock based on the sepsis-3 definition were included. Patients with other causes of cardiac dysfunction were excluded. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed for all the patients within 24 hours of diagnosis. Left ventricular systolic function was assessed using conventional echocardiography and speckle-tracking echocardiography.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with septic shock (<i>n</i> = 90) (study group) and 37 matched patients with sepsis but no septic shock (control group) were included. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) by conventional echocardiography showed no significant difference between two groups (58.2 ± 9.9 vs. 58.6 ± 8.3, <i>p</i>=0.804). The global longitudinal strain (GLS) by STE was significantly reduced in patients with septic shock compared with that in the control (-14.6 ± 3.3 vs. -17.1 ± 3.3, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Based on the cutoff value of GLS ≥ -15% for the definition of subclinical left ventricular systolic dysfunction, this dysfunction was detected in 50 patients with septic shock (55.6%) and in 6 patients in the control group (16.2%) (<i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Speckle-tracking echocardiography can detect early subclinical left ventricular systolic dysfunction via the left ventricular global longitudinal strain compared with conventional echocardiographic parameters in patients with septic shock.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46583,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Care Research and Practice\",\"volume\":\"2020 \",\"pages\":\"6098654\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2020/6098654\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Care Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6098654\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6098654","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

简介:左心室功能障碍在感染性休克中很常见。斑点跟踪超声心动图(STE)是一种新型的、高灵敏度的左心室功能评估方法,能够检测到常规超声心动图无法识别的亚临床心肌功能障碍。我们试图用斑点跟踪超声心动图评价脓毒性休克患者的亚临床左心室收缩功能。方法:选取2017年5月至2018年12月重症监护病房收治的年龄≥18岁、根据脓毒症-3定义诊断为脓毒症和脓毒性休克的患者。排除其他心功能障碍的患者。所有患者均在诊断后24小时内行经胸超声心动图检查。采用常规超声心动图和斑点跟踪超声心动图评价左心室收缩功能。结果:纳入脓毒性休克患者(n = 90)(研究组)和37例匹配的脓毒症但无脓毒性休克患者(对照组)。常规超声心动图左室射血分数(LVEF)两组比较差异无统计学意义(58.2±9.9比58.6±8.3,p=0.804)。脓毒性休克组经STE处理的总纵向应变(GLS)较对照组显著降低(-14.6±3.3 vs -17.1±3.3,p < 0.001)。以GLS≥-15%定义亚临床左室收缩功能障碍的临界值为标准,感染性休克患者50例(55.6%),对照组6例(16.2%)存在亚临床左室收缩功能障碍(p < 0.05)。结论:与常规超声心动图参数相比,斑点跟踪超声心动图可通过左室总纵应变检测出感染性休克患者早期亚临床左室收缩功能障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Subclinical Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction in Patients with Septic Shock Based on Sepsis-3 Definition: A Speckle-Tracking Echocardiography Study.

Subclinical Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction in Patients with Septic Shock Based on Sepsis-3 Definition: A Speckle-Tracking Echocardiography Study.

Introduction: Left ventricular dysfunction is quite common in septic shock. Speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE) is a novel, highly sensitive method for assessing left ventricular function, capable of detecting subclinical myocardial dysfunction, which is not identified with conventional echocardiography. We sought to evaluate subclinical left ventricular systolic function in patients with septic shock using speckle-tracking echocardiography.

Methods: From May 2017 to December 2018, patients aged ≥18 years admitted to the intensive care unit with the diagnosis of sepsis and septic shock based on the sepsis-3 definition were included. Patients with other causes of cardiac dysfunction were excluded. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed for all the patients within 24 hours of diagnosis. Left ventricular systolic function was assessed using conventional echocardiography and speckle-tracking echocardiography.

Results: Patients with septic shock (n = 90) (study group) and 37 matched patients with sepsis but no septic shock (control group) were included. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) by conventional echocardiography showed no significant difference between two groups (58.2 ± 9.9 vs. 58.6 ± 8.3, p=0.804). The global longitudinal strain (GLS) by STE was significantly reduced in patients with septic shock compared with that in the control (-14.6 ± 3.3 vs. -17.1 ± 3.3, p < 0.001). Based on the cutoff value of GLS ≥ -15% for the definition of subclinical left ventricular systolic dysfunction, this dysfunction was detected in 50 patients with septic shock (55.6%) and in 6 patients in the control group (16.2%) (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: Speckle-tracking echocardiography can detect early subclinical left ventricular systolic dysfunction via the left ventricular global longitudinal strain compared with conventional echocardiographic parameters in patients with septic shock.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Care Research and Practice
Critical Care Research and Practice CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信