Giulia Barbareschi, Sharon Sonenblum, Catherine Holloway, Stephen Sprigle
{"title":"背景重要吗?观察轮椅在不同环境条件下的移动。","authors":"Giulia Barbareschi, Sharon Sonenblum, Catherine Holloway, Stephen Sprigle","doi":"10.1080/10400435.2020.1818328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The setting in which wheelchair transfers are performed can affect the difficulty and the risks associated with completion. This article presents results from an observational study involving 13 wheelchair users performing independent transfers across four settings. The aim is to understand how the environment affects how different types of independent transfers are performed. Descriptive analysis was performed alongside an objective assessment using the Transfer Assessment Instrument (TAI). The perceived difficulty reported after each transfer was also collected. Two participants exhibited radically different transferring techniques in different scenarios. Additionally, the transferring scenario was found to significantly affect the perceived difficulty of sitting transfers (toilet 2.17 ±.88; bed 1.47 ±.65, <i>p</i> =.001; car 1.63 ±.82, <i>p</i> =.012) and standing transfers (car 3.5 ±.71; bed 1 ± 0, <i>p</i> =.03; toilet 1 ± 0, <i>p</i> =.03), and the TAI score attributed to sitting pivot with use of a transfer board (couch 4.3 ±.88; bed 6.93 ± 1.29, <i>p</i> =.022; car 7.13 ± 1.32, <i>p</i> =.018). Overall, environmental constraints can lead to major technique changes and, more often, to different positioning of hands and feet which could impact the transfer's biomechanics.</p>","PeriodicalId":282300,"journal":{"name":"Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA","volume":" ","pages":"326-333"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10400435.2020.1818328","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does the setting matter? Observing wheelchair transfers across different environmental conditions.\",\"authors\":\"Giulia Barbareschi, Sharon Sonenblum, Catherine Holloway, Stephen Sprigle\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10400435.2020.1818328\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The setting in which wheelchair transfers are performed can affect the difficulty and the risks associated with completion. This article presents results from an observational study involving 13 wheelchair users performing independent transfers across four settings. The aim is to understand how the environment affects how different types of independent transfers are performed. Descriptive analysis was performed alongside an objective assessment using the Transfer Assessment Instrument (TAI). The perceived difficulty reported after each transfer was also collected. Two participants exhibited radically different transferring techniques in different scenarios. Additionally, the transferring scenario was found to significantly affect the perceived difficulty of sitting transfers (toilet 2.17 ±.88; bed 1.47 ±.65, <i>p</i> =.001; car 1.63 ±.82, <i>p</i> =.012) and standing transfers (car 3.5 ±.71; bed 1 ± 0, <i>p</i> =.03; toilet 1 ± 0, <i>p</i> =.03), and the TAI score attributed to sitting pivot with use of a transfer board (couch 4.3 ±.88; bed 6.93 ± 1.29, <i>p</i> =.022; car 7.13 ± 1.32, <i>p</i> =.018). Overall, environmental constraints can lead to major technique changes and, more often, to different positioning of hands and feet which could impact the transfer's biomechanics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":282300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"326-333\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10400435.2020.1818328\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2020.1818328\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/10/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2020.1818328","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/10/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
进行轮椅转移的环境会影响完成的难度和风险。本文介绍了一项观察性研究的结果,该研究涉及13名轮椅使用者在四种环境下进行独立转移。目的是了解环境如何影响不同类型的独立传输的执行方式。描述性分析与使用转移评估工具(TAI)的客观评估一起进行。还收集了每次转移后报告的感知困难。两名参与者在不同的场景中表现出截然不同的转移技巧。此外,转移情境显著影响坐着转移的感知难度(如厕2.17±0.88;床1.47±。65, p =.001;车1.63±。82, p = 0.012)和站立转移(车3.5±0.71;床1±0,p =.03;坐便器1±0,p =.03),使用转移板坐式枢轴的TAI评分(沙发4.3±0.88;床层6.93±1.29,p = 0.022;车7.13±1.32,p = 0.018)。总的来说,环境限制可能导致重大的技术变化,更常见的是,手和脚的不同位置可能会影响转移的生物力学。
Does the setting matter? Observing wheelchair transfers across different environmental conditions.
The setting in which wheelchair transfers are performed can affect the difficulty and the risks associated with completion. This article presents results from an observational study involving 13 wheelchair users performing independent transfers across four settings. The aim is to understand how the environment affects how different types of independent transfers are performed. Descriptive analysis was performed alongside an objective assessment using the Transfer Assessment Instrument (TAI). The perceived difficulty reported after each transfer was also collected. Two participants exhibited radically different transferring techniques in different scenarios. Additionally, the transferring scenario was found to significantly affect the perceived difficulty of sitting transfers (toilet 2.17 ±.88; bed 1.47 ±.65, p =.001; car 1.63 ±.82, p =.012) and standing transfers (car 3.5 ±.71; bed 1 ± 0, p =.03; toilet 1 ± 0, p =.03), and the TAI score attributed to sitting pivot with use of a transfer board (couch 4.3 ±.88; bed 6.93 ± 1.29, p =.022; car 7.13 ± 1.32, p =.018). Overall, environmental constraints can lead to major technique changes and, more often, to different positioning of hands and feet which could impact the transfer's biomechanics.