手掌向上测试和屈曲和外旋的活动范围提供了与肩部疾病患者的残疾和感知疼痛的最佳相关性。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 RHEUMATOLOGY
Acta reumatologica portuguesa Pub Date : 2020-04-01
João Janeiro, Sofia Barreira, Patrícia Martins, Pedro Ninitas, João Eurico Fonseca, Jorge Campos, Jacinto Melo Monteiro
{"title":"手掌向上测试和屈曲和外旋的活动范围提供了与肩部疾病患者的残疾和感知疼痛的最佳相关性。","authors":"João Janeiro,&nbsp;Sofia Barreira,&nbsp;Patrícia Martins,&nbsp;Pedro Ninitas,&nbsp;João Eurico Fonseca,&nbsp;Jorge Campos,&nbsp;Jacinto Melo Monteiro","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to find a reliable set of clinical tests to predict pain and disability in patients with shoulder pain. Shoulder pain is the second most frequent musculoskeletal complaint in the primary care setting and has a great impact in work and leisure activities. Patient reported outcomes measuring pain and disability are available, but they are time-consuming, often biased by psychological and sociological factors and depend on patient collaboration. This was an observational, cross-sectional study, including patients with shoulder pain aged 18 to 70 years. Patients filled in the questionnaires Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure (DASH) and Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) pain scale. A Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for current pain was applied and sociodemographic and clinical data were collected. Physical examination included the Jobe, Neer and palm-up signs, range of motion (ROM) of shoulder abduction, flexion and rotation (internal and external), both active and passive. An independent t-test to compare differences between groups and the Spearman's coefficient for evaluation of bivariate correlation were used. Linear regression analysis was applied to relevant predictors. Tests were two-tailed and p values < 0.05 were considered significant. A total of 127 patients were included. Female patients and those with a positive Jobe, Neer or palm-up tests, complaints on dominant side, no leisure activity involving shoulder effort, a history of previous shoulder tendinopathy or taking analgesics had significantly higher DASH scores. Age and all range of motion variables significantly correlated with DASH scores. A linear regression model with six dependent variables (Palm-up test, range of motion in active flexion and external rotation, age, gender and complaints on dominant side) produced the highest correlation (R = 0.665), explaining 44% of the variance of DASH score. A model based on few physical examination items and individual objective data like age, gender and dominancy, can help predict disability and perceived pain in shoulder disorders. Palm-up test and range of motion in active flexion, abduction and external rotation showed best correlation with the outcome, but abduction was found redundant for the obtained prediction model.</p>","PeriodicalId":7229,"journal":{"name":"Acta reumatologica portuguesa","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Palm-up test and range of motion in flexion and external rotation provide best correlation with disability and perceived pain in patients with shoulder complaints.\",\"authors\":\"João Janeiro,&nbsp;Sofia Barreira,&nbsp;Patrícia Martins,&nbsp;Pedro Ninitas,&nbsp;João Eurico Fonseca,&nbsp;Jorge Campos,&nbsp;Jacinto Melo Monteiro\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of this study was to find a reliable set of clinical tests to predict pain and disability in patients with shoulder pain. Shoulder pain is the second most frequent musculoskeletal complaint in the primary care setting and has a great impact in work and leisure activities. Patient reported outcomes measuring pain and disability are available, but they are time-consuming, often biased by psychological and sociological factors and depend on patient collaboration. This was an observational, cross-sectional study, including patients with shoulder pain aged 18 to 70 years. Patients filled in the questionnaires Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure (DASH) and Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) pain scale. A Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for current pain was applied and sociodemographic and clinical data were collected. Physical examination included the Jobe, Neer and palm-up signs, range of motion (ROM) of shoulder abduction, flexion and rotation (internal and external), both active and passive. An independent t-test to compare differences between groups and the Spearman's coefficient for evaluation of bivariate correlation were used. Linear regression analysis was applied to relevant predictors. Tests were two-tailed and p values < 0.05 were considered significant. A total of 127 patients were included. Female patients and those with a positive Jobe, Neer or palm-up tests, complaints on dominant side, no leisure activity involving shoulder effort, a history of previous shoulder tendinopathy or taking analgesics had significantly higher DASH scores. Age and all range of motion variables significantly correlated with DASH scores. A linear regression model with six dependent variables (Palm-up test, range of motion in active flexion and external rotation, age, gender and complaints on dominant side) produced the highest correlation (R = 0.665), explaining 44% of the variance of DASH score. A model based on few physical examination items and individual objective data like age, gender and dominancy, can help predict disability and perceived pain in shoulder disorders. Palm-up test and range of motion in active flexion, abduction and external rotation showed best correlation with the outcome, but abduction was found redundant for the obtained prediction model.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta reumatologica portuguesa\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta reumatologica portuguesa\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta reumatologica portuguesa","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是寻找一套可靠的临床试验来预测肩痛患者的疼痛和残疾。肩痛是初级保健机构中第二大最常见的肌肉骨骼疾病,对工作和休闲活动有很大影响。患者报告的测量疼痛和残疾的结果是可用的,但它们是耗时的,往往受到心理和社会学因素的影响,并取决于患者的合作。这是一项观察性横断面研究,包括18至70岁的肩痛患者。患者填写手臂、肩和手残疾结局测量问卷(DASH)和肩部疼痛和残疾指数(SPADI)疼痛量表。采用视觉模拟量表(Visual Analogue Scale, VAS)评估患者当前疼痛,并收集社会人口学和临床数据。体格检查包括Jobe, never和手掌向上的迹象,活动范围(ROM)的肩外展,屈曲和旋转(内部和外部),主动和被动。采用独立t检验比较组间差异,采用Spearman系数评价双变量相关性。相关预测因子采用线性回归分析。检验为双尾检验,p值< 0.05为显著性。共纳入127例患者。女性患者以及Jobe、never或手掌试验阳性、主诉侧、无涉及肩部的休闲活动、既往肩部肌腱病变史或服用止痛药的患者的DASH评分明显较高。年龄和所有运动范围变量与DASH得分显著相关。一个包含6个因变量(手掌向上测试、主动屈曲和外旋活动范围、年龄、性别和主诉)的线性回归模型产生了最高的相关性(R = 0.665),解释了DASH评分方差的44%。一个基于少量体检项目和个人客观数据(如年龄、性别和优势)的模型,可以帮助预测肩部疾病的残疾和感知疼痛。主动屈曲、外展和外旋时的掌向上测试和活动范围与结果的相关性最好,但外展对于所获得的预测模型来说是多余的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Palm-up test and range of motion in flexion and external rotation provide best correlation with disability and perceived pain in patients with shoulder complaints.

The aim of this study was to find a reliable set of clinical tests to predict pain and disability in patients with shoulder pain. Shoulder pain is the second most frequent musculoskeletal complaint in the primary care setting and has a great impact in work and leisure activities. Patient reported outcomes measuring pain and disability are available, but they are time-consuming, often biased by psychological and sociological factors and depend on patient collaboration. This was an observational, cross-sectional study, including patients with shoulder pain aged 18 to 70 years. Patients filled in the questionnaires Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure (DASH) and Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) pain scale. A Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for current pain was applied and sociodemographic and clinical data were collected. Physical examination included the Jobe, Neer and palm-up signs, range of motion (ROM) of shoulder abduction, flexion and rotation (internal and external), both active and passive. An independent t-test to compare differences between groups and the Spearman's coefficient for evaluation of bivariate correlation were used. Linear regression analysis was applied to relevant predictors. Tests were two-tailed and p values < 0.05 were considered significant. A total of 127 patients were included. Female patients and those with a positive Jobe, Neer or palm-up tests, complaints on dominant side, no leisure activity involving shoulder effort, a history of previous shoulder tendinopathy or taking analgesics had significantly higher DASH scores. Age and all range of motion variables significantly correlated with DASH scores. A linear regression model with six dependent variables (Palm-up test, range of motion in active flexion and external rotation, age, gender and complaints on dominant side) produced the highest correlation (R = 0.665), explaining 44% of the variance of DASH score. A model based on few physical examination items and individual objective data like age, gender and dominancy, can help predict disability and perceived pain in shoulder disorders. Palm-up test and range of motion in active flexion, abduction and external rotation showed best correlation with the outcome, but abduction was found redundant for the obtained prediction model.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta reumatologica portuguesa
Acta reumatologica portuguesa 医学-风湿病学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Reumatólogica Portuguesa is a scientific peer reviewed journal covering all aspects of rheumatic diseases and related to Rheumatology. The journal publishes original articles, reviews, clinical cases, images in rheumatology, letters to the editor and clinical teaching (e.g. guidelines and clinical protocols). Published since 1973, Acta Reumatológica Portuguesa is the official scientific publication of the Portuguese Society of Rheumatology, a non-profit organization that promotes the knowledge and investigation of rheumatic diseases and the development of Rheumatology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信