二元和非二元变性人之间的健康差异:一项社区驱动的调查。

Q1 Social Sciences
International Journal of Transgenderism Pub Date : 2019-06-21 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1080/15532739.2019.1629370
Aisa Burgwal, Natia Gvianishvili, Vierge Hård, Julia Kata, Isidro García Nieto, Cal Orre, Adam Smiley, Jelena Vidić, Joz Motmans
{"title":"二元和非二元变性人之间的健康差异:一项社区驱动的调查。","authors":"Aisa Burgwal,&nbsp;Natia Gvianishvili,&nbsp;Vierge Hård,&nbsp;Julia Kata,&nbsp;Isidro García Nieto,&nbsp;Cal Orre,&nbsp;Adam Smiley,&nbsp;Jelena Vidić,&nbsp;Joz Motmans","doi":"10.1080/15532739.2019.1629370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Genderqueer and nonbinary () people have remained largely invisible in health research. Previous research shows worse outcomes on health indicators for trans people when compared with cisgender controls, but the differences between binary trans and GQNB individuals are inconclusive. <b>Aims:</b> To compare overall health and well-being of GQNB people with controls of trans men and trans women, taking into account the impact of the additive effect of their socio-economic position, as well as their current need for gender affirming medical interventions. <b>Methods:</b> A community-driven survey was conducted in 2016 in five countries (Georgia, Poland, Serbia, Spain, and Sweden). Self-reported health and general well-being were analysed for differences between binary trans and GQNB respondents. The effects of multiple control variables (age, economic situation, educational level, belonging to an ethnic, religious, sexual or ability minority group, sex assigned at birth) as well as the current need for gender affirming medical interventions were controlled for. <b>Results:</b> The sample consisted of 853 respondents aged 16 and older, with 254 trans women (29.8%), 369 trans men (43.2%), and 230 GQNB people (26%). GQNB respondents showed significantly worse self-reported health and worse general well-being in comparison to binary trans respondents. Additional negative impacts of having a lower educational level, having more economic stress, and belonging to a disability minority group were found. Being in need of gender affirming medical interventions contributed significantly to worse self-reported health, whereas being younger contributed to worse general well-being. <b>Discussion:</b> In understanding health disparities between binary trans and GQNB people, it is necessary to take into account the additive effect of multiple socio-economic positions, and the current need for gender affirming medical interventions. The high proportion of GQNB respondents who report worse health outcomes highlights the need for policy makers and health-care providers in creating nonbinary-inclusive environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":56012,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Transgenderism","volume":" ","pages":"218-229"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15532739.2019.1629370","citationCount":"50","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health disparities between binary and non binary trans people: A community-driven survey.\",\"authors\":\"Aisa Burgwal,&nbsp;Natia Gvianishvili,&nbsp;Vierge Hård,&nbsp;Julia Kata,&nbsp;Isidro García Nieto,&nbsp;Cal Orre,&nbsp;Adam Smiley,&nbsp;Jelena Vidić,&nbsp;Joz Motmans\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15532739.2019.1629370\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Genderqueer and nonbinary () people have remained largely invisible in health research. Previous research shows worse outcomes on health indicators for trans people when compared with cisgender controls, but the differences between binary trans and GQNB individuals are inconclusive. <b>Aims:</b> To compare overall health and well-being of GQNB people with controls of trans men and trans women, taking into account the impact of the additive effect of their socio-economic position, as well as their current need for gender affirming medical interventions. <b>Methods:</b> A community-driven survey was conducted in 2016 in five countries (Georgia, Poland, Serbia, Spain, and Sweden). Self-reported health and general well-being were analysed for differences between binary trans and GQNB respondents. The effects of multiple control variables (age, economic situation, educational level, belonging to an ethnic, religious, sexual or ability minority group, sex assigned at birth) as well as the current need for gender affirming medical interventions were controlled for. <b>Results:</b> The sample consisted of 853 respondents aged 16 and older, with 254 trans women (29.8%), 369 trans men (43.2%), and 230 GQNB people (26%). GQNB respondents showed significantly worse self-reported health and worse general well-being in comparison to binary trans respondents. Additional negative impacts of having a lower educational level, having more economic stress, and belonging to a disability minority group were found. Being in need of gender affirming medical interventions contributed significantly to worse self-reported health, whereas being younger contributed to worse general well-being. <b>Discussion:</b> In understanding health disparities between binary trans and GQNB people, it is necessary to take into account the additive effect of multiple socio-economic positions, and the current need for gender affirming medical interventions. The high proportion of GQNB respondents who report worse health outcomes highlights the need for policy makers and health-care providers in creating nonbinary-inclusive environments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Transgenderism\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"218-229\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15532739.2019.1629370\",\"citationCount\":\"50\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Transgenderism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15532739.2019.1629370\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Transgenderism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15532739.2019.1629370","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 50

摘要

背景:性别酷儿和非二元()人在健康研究中基本上是不可见的。先前的研究表明,与顺性别对照组相比,跨性别者的健康指标结果更差,但二元跨性别者和GQNB个体之间的差异尚无定论。目的:比较GQNB人群与跨性别男性和跨性别女性控制组的整体健康和福祉,同时考虑到他们的社会经济地位的叠加效应的影响,以及他们目前对性别肯定医疗干预的需求。方法:2016年在5个国家(格鲁吉亚、波兰、塞尔维亚、西班牙和瑞典)开展社区主导调查。自我报告的健康状况和总体幸福感被分析为二元跨和GQNB受访者之间的差异。控制了多个控制变量(年龄、经济状况、教育水平、属于少数民族、宗教、性或能力少数群体、出生时指定的性别)的影响以及当前对性别肯定医疗干预的需求。结果:样本包括853名16岁及以上的受访者,其中跨性别女性254人(29.8%),跨性别男性369人(43.2%),GQNB 230人(26%)。与二元跨性别受访者相比,GQNB受访者的自我报告健康状况和总体幸福感明显较差。研究还发现,受教育程度较低、经济压力较大以及属于残疾少数群体等因素也会产生负面影响。需要性别肯定的医疗干预措施,在很大程度上导致自我报告的健康状况较差,而较年轻则导致总体幸福感较差。讨论:在理解二元跨性别和GQNB人群之间的健康差异时,有必要考虑多重社会经济地位的叠加效应,以及当前对性别肯定医疗干预的需求。报告健康结果较差的GQNB答复者所占比例很高,这突出表明决策者和卫生保健提供者需要创造非二元包容性环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Health disparities between binary and non binary trans people: A community-driven survey.

Background: Genderqueer and nonbinary () people have remained largely invisible in health research. Previous research shows worse outcomes on health indicators for trans people when compared with cisgender controls, but the differences between binary trans and GQNB individuals are inconclusive. Aims: To compare overall health and well-being of GQNB people with controls of trans men and trans women, taking into account the impact of the additive effect of their socio-economic position, as well as their current need for gender affirming medical interventions. Methods: A community-driven survey was conducted in 2016 in five countries (Georgia, Poland, Serbia, Spain, and Sweden). Self-reported health and general well-being were analysed for differences between binary trans and GQNB respondents. The effects of multiple control variables (age, economic situation, educational level, belonging to an ethnic, religious, sexual or ability minority group, sex assigned at birth) as well as the current need for gender affirming medical interventions were controlled for. Results: The sample consisted of 853 respondents aged 16 and older, with 254 trans women (29.8%), 369 trans men (43.2%), and 230 GQNB people (26%). GQNB respondents showed significantly worse self-reported health and worse general well-being in comparison to binary trans respondents. Additional negative impacts of having a lower educational level, having more economic stress, and belonging to a disability minority group were found. Being in need of gender affirming medical interventions contributed significantly to worse self-reported health, whereas being younger contributed to worse general well-being. Discussion: In understanding health disparities between binary trans and GQNB people, it is necessary to take into account the additive effect of multiple socio-economic positions, and the current need for gender affirming medical interventions. The high proportion of GQNB respondents who report worse health outcomes highlights the need for policy makers and health-care providers in creating nonbinary-inclusive environments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Transgenderism
International Journal of Transgenderism Social Sciences-Gender Studies
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: International Journal of Transgenderism, together with its partner organization the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH), offers an international, multidisciplinary scholarly forum for publication in the field of transgender health in its broadest sense for academics, practitioners, policy makers, and the general population. The journal welcomes contributions from a range of disciplines, such as: Endocrinology Surgery Obstetrics and Gynaecology Psychiatry Psychology Speech and language therapy Sexual medicine Sexology Family therapy Public health Sociology Counselling Law Medical ethics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信