羟氯喹在美国COVID-19住院退伍军人中的使用结果

Med (New York, N.y.) Pub Date : 2020-12-18 Epub Date: 2020-06-05 DOI:10.1016/j.medj.2020.06.001
Joseph Magagnoli, Siddharth Narendran, Felipe Pereira, Tammy H Cummings, James W Hardin, S Scott Sutton, Jayakrishna Ambati
{"title":"羟氯喹在美国COVID-19住院退伍军人中的使用结果","authors":"Joseph Magagnoli,&nbsp;Siddharth Narendran,&nbsp;Felipe Pereira,&nbsp;Tammy H Cummings,&nbsp;James W Hardin,&nbsp;S Scott Sutton,&nbsp;Jayakrishna Ambati","doi":"10.1016/j.medj.2020.06.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite limited and conflicting evidence, hydroxychloroquine, alone or in combination with azithromycin, is widely used in COVID-19 therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective study of electronic health records of patients hospitalized with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in US Veterans Health Administration medical centers between March 9, 2020 and April 29, 2020. Patients hospitalized within 24 h of diagnosis were classified based on their exposure to hydroxychloroquine alone (HC) or with azithromycin (HC+AZ) or no HC as treatments. The primary outcomes were mortality and use of mechanical ventilation.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A total of 807 patients were evaluated. Compared to the no HC group, after propensity score adjustment for clinical characteristics, the risk of death from any cause was higher in the HC group (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16-2.89; p = 0.009), but not in the HC+AZ group (aHR, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.80-2.15; p = 0.28). Both the propensity-score-adjusted risks of mechanical ventilation and death after mechanical ventilation were not significantly different in the HC group (aHR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.78-1.82; p = 0.42 and aHR, 2.11; 95% CI, 0.96-4.62; p = 0.06, respectively) or in the HC+AZ group (aHR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.72-1.66; p = 0.69 and aHR, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.59-2.68; p = 0.56, respectively) compared to the no HC group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among patients hospitalized with COVID-19, this retrospective study did not identify any significant reduction in mortality or in the need for mechanical ventilation with hydroxychloroquine treatment with or without azithromycin.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>University of Virginia Strategic Investment Fund.</p>","PeriodicalId":272244,"journal":{"name":"Med (New York, N.y.)","volume":" ","pages":"114-127.e3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.medj.2020.06.001","citationCount":"641","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of Hydroxychloroquine Usage in United States Veterans Hospitalized with COVID-19.\",\"authors\":\"Joseph Magagnoli,&nbsp;Siddharth Narendran,&nbsp;Felipe Pereira,&nbsp;Tammy H Cummings,&nbsp;James W Hardin,&nbsp;S Scott Sutton,&nbsp;Jayakrishna Ambati\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.medj.2020.06.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite limited and conflicting evidence, hydroxychloroquine, alone or in combination with azithromycin, is widely used in COVID-19 therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective study of electronic health records of patients hospitalized with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in US Veterans Health Administration medical centers between March 9, 2020 and April 29, 2020. Patients hospitalized within 24 h of diagnosis were classified based on their exposure to hydroxychloroquine alone (HC) or with azithromycin (HC+AZ) or no HC as treatments. The primary outcomes were mortality and use of mechanical ventilation.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A total of 807 patients were evaluated. Compared to the no HC group, after propensity score adjustment for clinical characteristics, the risk of death from any cause was higher in the HC group (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16-2.89; p = 0.009), but not in the HC+AZ group (aHR, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.80-2.15; p = 0.28). Both the propensity-score-adjusted risks of mechanical ventilation and death after mechanical ventilation were not significantly different in the HC group (aHR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.78-1.82; p = 0.42 and aHR, 2.11; 95% CI, 0.96-4.62; p = 0.06, respectively) or in the HC+AZ group (aHR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.72-1.66; p = 0.69 and aHR, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.59-2.68; p = 0.56, respectively) compared to the no HC group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among patients hospitalized with COVID-19, this retrospective study did not identify any significant reduction in mortality or in the need for mechanical ventilation with hydroxychloroquine treatment with or without azithromycin.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>University of Virginia Strategic Investment Fund.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":272244,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Med (New York, N.y.)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"114-127.e3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.medj.2020.06.001\",\"citationCount\":\"641\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Med (New York, N.y.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medj.2020.06.001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/6/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Med (New York, N.y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medj.2020.06.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/6/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 641

摘要

背景:尽管证据有限且相互矛盾,羟氯喹单独使用或与阿奇霉素联合使用仍被广泛用于COVID-19治疗。方法:对2020年3月9日至2020年4月29日期间在美国退伍军人卫生管理局医疗中心确诊的SARS-CoV-2感染住院患者的电子健康记录进行回顾性研究。诊断后24小时内住院的患者根据其单独羟氯喹(HC)或阿奇霉素(HC+AZ)或不使用HC治疗进行分类。主要结局是死亡率和机械通气的使用。结果:共评估了807例患者。与无HC组相比,经临床特征倾向评分调整后,HC组因任何原因死亡的风险更高(校正风险比[aHR], 1.83;95%置信区间[CI], 1.16-2.89;p = 0.009), HC+AZ组无明显差异(aHR, 1.31;95% ci, 0.80-2.15;P = 0.28)。HC组经倾向评分调整后的机械通气风险和机械通气后死亡风险均无显著差异(aHR, 1.19;95% ci, 0.78-1.82;p = 0.42, aHR为2.11;95% ci, 0.96-4.62;p = 0.06)或HC+AZ组(aHR, 1.09;95% ci, 0.72-1.66;p = 0.69, aHR为1.25;95% ci, 0.59-2.68;p = 0.56)。结论:在COVID-19住院患者中,本回顾性研究未发现羟氯喹联合或不联合阿奇霉素治疗可显著降低死亡率或降低机械通气需求。资助:弗吉尼亚大学战略投资基金。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Outcomes of Hydroxychloroquine Usage in United States Veterans Hospitalized with COVID-19.

Outcomes of Hydroxychloroquine Usage in United States Veterans Hospitalized with COVID-19.

Outcomes of Hydroxychloroquine Usage in United States Veterans Hospitalized with COVID-19.

Background: Despite limited and conflicting evidence, hydroxychloroquine, alone or in combination with azithromycin, is widely used in COVID-19 therapy.

Methods: We performed a retrospective study of electronic health records of patients hospitalized with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in US Veterans Health Administration medical centers between March 9, 2020 and April 29, 2020. Patients hospitalized within 24 h of diagnosis were classified based on their exposure to hydroxychloroquine alone (HC) or with azithromycin (HC+AZ) or no HC as treatments. The primary outcomes were mortality and use of mechanical ventilation.

Findings: A total of 807 patients were evaluated. Compared to the no HC group, after propensity score adjustment for clinical characteristics, the risk of death from any cause was higher in the HC group (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16-2.89; p = 0.009), but not in the HC+AZ group (aHR, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.80-2.15; p = 0.28). Both the propensity-score-adjusted risks of mechanical ventilation and death after mechanical ventilation were not significantly different in the HC group (aHR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.78-1.82; p = 0.42 and aHR, 2.11; 95% CI, 0.96-4.62; p = 0.06, respectively) or in the HC+AZ group (aHR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.72-1.66; p = 0.69 and aHR, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.59-2.68; p = 0.56, respectively) compared to the no HC group.

Conclusions: Among patients hospitalized with COVID-19, this retrospective study did not identify any significant reduction in mortality or in the need for mechanical ventilation with hydroxychloroquine treatment with or without azithromycin.

Funding: University of Virginia Strategic Investment Fund.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信