开普勒观测到的候选行星。8一个完全自动化的目录与测量完整性和可靠性基于数据发布25。

IF 8.6 1区 物理与天体物理 Q1 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series Pub Date : 2018-04-01 Epub Date: 2018-04-09 DOI:10.3847/1538-4365/aab4f9
Susan E Thompson, Jeffrey L Coughlin, Kelsey Hoffman, Fergal Mullally, Jessie L Christiansen, Christopher J Burke, Steve Bryson, Natalie Batalha, Michael R Haas, Joseph Catanzarite, Jason F Rowe, Geert Barentsen, Douglas A Caldwell, Bruce D Clarke, Jon M Jenkins, Jie Li, David W Latham, Jack J Lissauer, Savita Mathur, Robert L Morris, Shawn E Seader, Jeffrey C Smith, Todd C Klaus, Joseph D Twicken, Jeffrey E Van Cleve, Bill Wohler, Rachel Akeson, David R Ciardi, William D Cochran, Christopher E Henze, Steve B Howell, Daniel Huber, Andrej Prša, Solange V Ramírez, Timothy D Morton, Thomas Barclay, Jennifer R Campbell, William J Chaplin, David Charbonneau, Jørgen Christensen-Dalsgaard, Jessie L Dotson, Laurance Doyle, Edward W Dunham, Andrea K Dupree, Eric B Ford, John C Geary, Forrest R Girouard, Howard Isaacson, Hans Kjeldsen, Elisa V Quintana, Darin Ragozzine, Avi Shporer, Victor Silva Aguirre, Jason H Steffen, Martin Still, Peter Tenenbaum, William F Welsh, Angie Wolfgang, Khadeejah A Zamudio, David G Koch, William J Borucki
{"title":"开普勒观测到的候选行星。8一个完全自动化的目录与测量完整性和可靠性基于数据发布25。","authors":"Susan E Thompson, Jeffrey L Coughlin, Kelsey Hoffman, Fergal Mullally, Jessie L Christiansen, Christopher J Burke, Steve Bryson, Natalie Batalha, Michael R Haas, Joseph Catanzarite, Jason F Rowe, Geert Barentsen, Douglas A Caldwell, Bruce D Clarke, Jon M Jenkins, Jie Li, David W Latham, Jack J Lissauer, Savita Mathur, Robert L Morris, Shawn E Seader, Jeffrey C Smith, Todd C Klaus, Joseph D Twicken, Jeffrey E Van Cleve, Bill Wohler, Rachel Akeson, David R Ciardi, William D Cochran, Christopher E Henze, Steve B Howell, Daniel Huber, Andrej Prša, Solange V Ramírez, Timothy D Morton, Thomas Barclay, Jennifer R Campbell, William J Chaplin, David Charbonneau, Jørgen Christensen-Dalsgaard, Jessie L Dotson, Laurance Doyle, Edward W Dunham, Andrea K Dupree, Eric B Ford, John C Geary, Forrest R Girouard, Howard Isaacson, Hans Kjeldsen, Elisa V Quintana, Darin Ragozzine, Avi Shporer, Victor Silva Aguirre, Jason H Steffen, Martin Still, Peter Tenenbaum, William F Welsh, Angie Wolfgang, Khadeejah A Zamudio, David G Koch, William J Borucki","doi":"10.3847/1538-4365/aab4f9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We present the Kepler Object of Interest (KOI) catalog of transiting exoplanets based on searching four years of <i>Kepler</i> time series photometry (Data Release 25, Q1-Q17). The catalog contains 8054 KOIs of which 4034 are planet candidates with periods between 0.25 and 632 days. Of these candidates, 219 are new in this catalog and include two new candidates in multi-planet systems (KOI-82.06 and KOI-2926.05), and ten new high-reliability, terrestrial-size, habitable zone candidates. This catalog was created using a tool called the Robovetter which automatically vets the DR25 Threshold Crossing Events (TCEs) found by the <i>Kepler</i> Pipeline (Twicken et al. 2016). Because of this automation, we were also able to vet simulated data sets and therefore measure how well the Robovetter separates those TCEs caused by noise from those caused by low signal-to-noise transits. Because of these measurements we fully expect that this catalog can be used to accurately calculate the frequency of planets out to <i>Kepler</i>'s detection limit, which includes temperate, super-Earth size planets around GK dwarf stars in our Galaxy. This paper discusses the Robovetter and the metrics it uses to decide which TCEs are called planet candidates in the DR25 KOI catalog. We also discuss the simulated transits, simulated systematic noise, and simulated astrophysical false positives created in order to characterize the properties of the final catalog. For orbital periods less than 100 d the Robovetter completeness (the fraction of simulated transits that are determined to be planet candidates) across all observed stars is greater than 85%. For the same period range, the catalog reliability (the fraction of candidates that are not due to instrumental or stellar noise) is greater than 98%. However, for low signal-to-noise candidates found between 200 and 500 days, our measurements indicate that the Robovetter is 73.5% complete and 37.2% reliable across all searched stars (or 76.7% complete and 50.5% reliable when considering just the FGK dwarf stars). We describe how the measured completeness and reliability varies with period, signal-to-noise, number of transits, and stellar type. Also, we discuss a value called the disposition score which provides an easy way to select a more reliable, albeit less complete, sample of candidates. The entire KOI catalog, the transit fits using Markov chain Monte Carlo methods, and all of the simulated data used to characterize this catalog are available at the NASA Exoplanet Archive.</p>","PeriodicalId":8588,"journal":{"name":"Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series","volume":"235 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3847/1538-4365/aab4f9","citationCount":"265","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PLANETARY CANDIDATES OBSERVED BY <i>Kepler</i>. VIII. A FULLY AUTOMATED CATALOG WITH MEASURED COMPLETENESS AND RELIABILITY BASED ON DATA RELEASE 25.\",\"authors\":\"Susan E Thompson, Jeffrey L Coughlin, Kelsey Hoffman, Fergal Mullally, Jessie L Christiansen, Christopher J Burke, Steve Bryson, Natalie Batalha, Michael R Haas, Joseph Catanzarite, Jason F Rowe, Geert Barentsen, Douglas A Caldwell, Bruce D Clarke, Jon M Jenkins, Jie Li, David W Latham, Jack J Lissauer, Savita Mathur, Robert L Morris, Shawn E Seader, Jeffrey C Smith, Todd C Klaus, Joseph D Twicken, Jeffrey E Van Cleve, Bill Wohler, Rachel Akeson, David R Ciardi, William D Cochran, Christopher E Henze, Steve B Howell, Daniel Huber, Andrej Prša, Solange V Ramírez, Timothy D Morton, Thomas Barclay, Jennifer R Campbell, William J Chaplin, David Charbonneau, Jørgen Christensen-Dalsgaard, Jessie L Dotson, Laurance Doyle, Edward W Dunham, Andrea K Dupree, Eric B Ford, John C Geary, Forrest R Girouard, Howard Isaacson, Hans Kjeldsen, Elisa V Quintana, Darin Ragozzine, Avi Shporer, Victor Silva Aguirre, Jason H Steffen, Martin Still, Peter Tenenbaum, William F Welsh, Angie Wolfgang, Khadeejah A Zamudio, David G Koch, William J Borucki\",\"doi\":\"10.3847/1538-4365/aab4f9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We present the Kepler Object of Interest (KOI) catalog of transiting exoplanets based on searching four years of <i>Kepler</i> time series photometry (Data Release 25, Q1-Q17). The catalog contains 8054 KOIs of which 4034 are planet candidates with periods between 0.25 and 632 days. Of these candidates, 219 are new in this catalog and include two new candidates in multi-planet systems (KOI-82.06 and KOI-2926.05), and ten new high-reliability, terrestrial-size, habitable zone candidates. This catalog was created using a tool called the Robovetter which automatically vets the DR25 Threshold Crossing Events (TCEs) found by the <i>Kepler</i> Pipeline (Twicken et al. 2016). Because of this automation, we were also able to vet simulated data sets and therefore measure how well the Robovetter separates those TCEs caused by noise from those caused by low signal-to-noise transits. Because of these measurements we fully expect that this catalog can be used to accurately calculate the frequency of planets out to <i>Kepler</i>'s detection limit, which includes temperate, super-Earth size planets around GK dwarf stars in our Galaxy. This paper discusses the Robovetter and the metrics it uses to decide which TCEs are called planet candidates in the DR25 KOI catalog. We also discuss the simulated transits, simulated systematic noise, and simulated astrophysical false positives created in order to characterize the properties of the final catalog. For orbital periods less than 100 d the Robovetter completeness (the fraction of simulated transits that are determined to be planet candidates) across all observed stars is greater than 85%. For the same period range, the catalog reliability (the fraction of candidates that are not due to instrumental or stellar noise) is greater than 98%. However, for low signal-to-noise candidates found between 200 and 500 days, our measurements indicate that the Robovetter is 73.5% complete and 37.2% reliable across all searched stars (or 76.7% complete and 50.5% reliable when considering just the FGK dwarf stars). We describe how the measured completeness and reliability varies with period, signal-to-noise, number of transits, and stellar type. Also, we discuss a value called the disposition score which provides an easy way to select a more reliable, albeit less complete, sample of candidates. The entire KOI catalog, the transit fits using Markov chain Monte Carlo methods, and all of the simulated data used to characterize this catalog are available at the NASA Exoplanet Archive.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8588,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series\",\"volume\":\"235 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3847/1538-4365/aab4f9\",\"citationCount\":\"265\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/aab4f9\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/4/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/aab4f9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/4/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 265

摘要

我们提出了开普勒感兴趣的对象(KOI)目录的凌日系外行星基于搜索四年的开普勒时间序列光度(数据发布25,Q1-Q17)。该目录包含8054颗koi,其中4034颗是周期在0.25至632天之间的候选行星。在这些候选者中,219个是新发现的,包括两个多行星系统的候选者(KOI-82.06和KOI-2926.05),以及10个新的高可靠性,陆地大小,宜居带候选者。该目录是使用一种名为Robovetter的工具创建的,该工具可以自动审查开普勒管道发现的DR25阈值交叉事件(tce) (Twicken et al. 2016)。由于这种自动化,我们也能够审查模拟数据集,从而测量Robovetter区分由噪声引起的tce和由低信噪转换引起的tce的能力。由于这些测量结果,我们完全期望这个目录可以用来精确地计算出开普勒探测极限之外的行星的频率,其中包括我们银河系中围绕GK矮星的温带、超级地球大小的行星。本文讨论了Robovetter以及它用来决定哪些tce被称为DR25 KOI星表中的候选行星的指标。我们还讨论了模拟的凌日、模拟的系统噪声和模拟的天体物理假阳性,这些假阳性是为了描述最终星表的特性而产生的。对于轨道周期小于100 d的所有观测恒星,Robovetter完备性(被确定为行星候选者的模拟凌日的比例)大于85%。在同一时期范围内,星表可靠性(不是由仪器或恒星噪声引起的候选星的比例)大于98%。然而,对于在200至500天内发现的低信噪比候选者,我们的测量表明,在所有搜索的恒星中,Robovetter的完成率为73.5%,可靠性为37.2%(仅考虑FGK矮星时,完成率为76.7%,可靠性为50.5%)。我们描述了测量的完整性和可靠性如何随周期、信噪比、凌日次数和恒星类型而变化。此外,我们还讨论了一个被称为性格分数的值,它提供了一种简单的方法来选择更可靠的候选人样本,尽管不太完整。整个KOI目录,凌日使用马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗方法拟合,所有用于描述该目录的模拟数据都可以在NASA系外行星档案中获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

PLANETARY CANDIDATES OBSERVED BY <i>Kepler</i>. VIII. A FULLY AUTOMATED CATALOG WITH MEASURED COMPLETENESS AND RELIABILITY BASED ON DATA RELEASE 25.

PLANETARY CANDIDATES OBSERVED BY Kepler. VIII. A FULLY AUTOMATED CATALOG WITH MEASURED COMPLETENESS AND RELIABILITY BASED ON DATA RELEASE 25.

We present the Kepler Object of Interest (KOI) catalog of transiting exoplanets based on searching four years of Kepler time series photometry (Data Release 25, Q1-Q17). The catalog contains 8054 KOIs of which 4034 are planet candidates with periods between 0.25 and 632 days. Of these candidates, 219 are new in this catalog and include two new candidates in multi-planet systems (KOI-82.06 and KOI-2926.05), and ten new high-reliability, terrestrial-size, habitable zone candidates. This catalog was created using a tool called the Robovetter which automatically vets the DR25 Threshold Crossing Events (TCEs) found by the Kepler Pipeline (Twicken et al. 2016). Because of this automation, we were also able to vet simulated data sets and therefore measure how well the Robovetter separates those TCEs caused by noise from those caused by low signal-to-noise transits. Because of these measurements we fully expect that this catalog can be used to accurately calculate the frequency of planets out to Kepler's detection limit, which includes temperate, super-Earth size planets around GK dwarf stars in our Galaxy. This paper discusses the Robovetter and the metrics it uses to decide which TCEs are called planet candidates in the DR25 KOI catalog. We also discuss the simulated transits, simulated systematic noise, and simulated astrophysical false positives created in order to characterize the properties of the final catalog. For orbital periods less than 100 d the Robovetter completeness (the fraction of simulated transits that are determined to be planet candidates) across all observed stars is greater than 85%. For the same period range, the catalog reliability (the fraction of candidates that are not due to instrumental or stellar noise) is greater than 98%. However, for low signal-to-noise candidates found between 200 and 500 days, our measurements indicate that the Robovetter is 73.5% complete and 37.2% reliable across all searched stars (or 76.7% complete and 50.5% reliable when considering just the FGK dwarf stars). We describe how the measured completeness and reliability varies with period, signal-to-noise, number of transits, and stellar type. Also, we discuss a value called the disposition score which provides an easy way to select a more reliable, albeit less complete, sample of candidates. The entire KOI catalog, the transit fits using Markov chain Monte Carlo methods, and all of the simulated data used to characterize this catalog are available at the NASA Exoplanet Archive.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 地学天文-天文与天体物理
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
5.70%
发文量
264
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Astrophysical Journal Supplement (ApJS) serves as an open-access journal that publishes significant articles featuring extensive data or calculations in the field of astrophysics. It also facilitates Special Issues, presenting thematically related papers simultaneously in a single volume.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信