{"title":"低风险结外自然杀伤细胞/鼻型t细胞淋巴瘤的最佳化疗联合放疗方案:倾向评分匹配分析","authors":"Jin Li, Yajun Li, Ruolan Zeng, Jingguan Lin, Meizuo Zhong, Xianling Liu, Yizi He, Junqiao He, Zhou Ouyang, Lijun Huang, Ling Xiao, Hui Zhou","doi":"10.2147/TCRM.S254246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This retrospective study compared effectiveness between ≤4 cycles and ≥5 cycles of L-asparaginase/pegaspargase-based chemoradiation in newly diagnosed low-risk extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma (ENKTL), nasal type classified according to the Prognostic Index of Natural Killer (PINK) lymphoma model.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Patients were categorized into ≤4-cycle (2-4 chemotherapy cycles, n = 166) and ≥5-cycle groups (5-6 cycles, n = 86). Propensity score matching analysis was used to reduce potential confounding bias between the two groups. Treatment responses, adverse events, and survival outcomes between the two groups were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No matter before or after matching (65 in the ≤4-cycle group, 65 in the ≥5-cycle group), response rates and survival outcomes were similar between the ≤4-cycle and ≥5-cycle groups. Incidences of grade 1-2 anemia and transaminase elevation were higher in the ≥5-cycle group. After matching, for stage IE disease, there were no differences in response rates and survival outcomes between the two groups. For stage IIE disease, the complete response rate was higher in the ≥5-cycle group (72.4% vs 92.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.049), and the 3-year overall survival (65.5% vs 85.2%, <i>p</i> = 0.024) and 3-year progression-free survival (58.6% vs 81.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.027) rates were significantly extended in the ≥5-cycle group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When chemoradiotherapy strategies with L-asparaginase/pegaspargase-based regimens are applied to modern low-risk ENKTL patients classified according to the PINK model, it may be better to moderately extend chemotherapy courses in patients with stage IIE disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":48769,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management","volume":"16 ","pages":"1151-1163"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/TCRM.S254246","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal Courses of Chemotherapy Combined with Radiotherapy for Low-Risk Extranodal Natural Killer/T-Cell Lymphoma, Nasal Type: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Jin Li, Yajun Li, Ruolan Zeng, Jingguan Lin, Meizuo Zhong, Xianling Liu, Yizi He, Junqiao He, Zhou Ouyang, Lijun Huang, Ling Xiao, Hui Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/TCRM.S254246\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This retrospective study compared effectiveness between ≤4 cycles and ≥5 cycles of L-asparaginase/pegaspargase-based chemoradiation in newly diagnosed low-risk extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma (ENKTL), nasal type classified according to the Prognostic Index of Natural Killer (PINK) lymphoma model.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Patients were categorized into ≤4-cycle (2-4 chemotherapy cycles, n = 166) and ≥5-cycle groups (5-6 cycles, n = 86). Propensity score matching analysis was used to reduce potential confounding bias between the two groups. Treatment responses, adverse events, and survival outcomes between the two groups were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No matter before or after matching (65 in the ≤4-cycle group, 65 in the ≥5-cycle group), response rates and survival outcomes were similar between the ≤4-cycle and ≥5-cycle groups. Incidences of grade 1-2 anemia and transaminase elevation were higher in the ≥5-cycle group. After matching, for stage IE disease, there were no differences in response rates and survival outcomes between the two groups. For stage IIE disease, the complete response rate was higher in the ≥5-cycle group (72.4% vs 92.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.049), and the 3-year overall survival (65.5% vs 85.2%, <i>p</i> = 0.024) and 3-year progression-free survival (58.6% vs 81.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.027) rates were significantly extended in the ≥5-cycle group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When chemoradiotherapy strategies with L-asparaginase/pegaspargase-based regimens are applied to modern low-risk ENKTL patients classified according to the PINK model, it may be better to moderately extend chemotherapy courses in patients with stage IIE disease.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48769,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"1151-1163\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/TCRM.S254246\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S254246\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S254246","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
目的:本回顾性研究比较了l -天冬酰胺酶/飞天冬酰胺为基础的放化疗治疗≤4周期和≥5周期新诊断的低危结外自然杀伤/ t细胞淋巴瘤(ENKTL)的疗效,根据自然杀伤(PINK)淋巴瘤模型的预后指数进行鼻型分类。患者和方法:患者分为≤4周期组(2-4个化疗周期,n = 166)和≥5周期组(5-6个化疗周期,n = 86)。倾向评分匹配分析用于减少两组间潜在的混杂偏倚。分析两组患者的治疗反应、不良事件和生存结果。结果:无论配对前后(≤4周期组65例,≥5周期组65例),≤4周期组和≥5周期组的有效率和生存结局相似。≥5周期组1-2级贫血和转氨酶升高的发生率较高。配对后,对于IE期疾病,两组之间的反应率和生存结果没有差异。对于IIE期疾病,≥5个周期组的完全缓解率更高(72.4% vs 92.6%, p = 0.049),≥5个周期组的3年总生存率(65.5% vs 85.2%, p = 0.024)和3年无进展生存率(58.6% vs 81.5%, p = 0.027)显著延长。结论:当l -天冬酰胺酶/pegaspargas为基础的放化疗策略应用于根据PINK模型分类的现代低风险ENKTL患者时,IIE期患者适度延长化疗疗程可能更好。
Optimal Courses of Chemotherapy Combined with Radiotherapy for Low-Risk Extranodal Natural Killer/T-Cell Lymphoma, Nasal Type: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.
Purpose: This retrospective study compared effectiveness between ≤4 cycles and ≥5 cycles of L-asparaginase/pegaspargase-based chemoradiation in newly diagnosed low-risk extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma (ENKTL), nasal type classified according to the Prognostic Index of Natural Killer (PINK) lymphoma model.
Patients and methods: Patients were categorized into ≤4-cycle (2-4 chemotherapy cycles, n = 166) and ≥5-cycle groups (5-6 cycles, n = 86). Propensity score matching analysis was used to reduce potential confounding bias between the two groups. Treatment responses, adverse events, and survival outcomes between the two groups were analyzed.
Results: No matter before or after matching (65 in the ≤4-cycle group, 65 in the ≥5-cycle group), response rates and survival outcomes were similar between the ≤4-cycle and ≥5-cycle groups. Incidences of grade 1-2 anemia and transaminase elevation were higher in the ≥5-cycle group. After matching, for stage IE disease, there were no differences in response rates and survival outcomes between the two groups. For stage IIE disease, the complete response rate was higher in the ≥5-cycle group (72.4% vs 92.6%, p = 0.049), and the 3-year overall survival (65.5% vs 85.2%, p = 0.024) and 3-year progression-free survival (58.6% vs 81.5%, p = 0.027) rates were significantly extended in the ≥5-cycle group.
Conclusion: When chemoradiotherapy strategies with L-asparaginase/pegaspargase-based regimens are applied to modern low-risk ENKTL patients classified according to the PINK model, it may be better to moderately extend chemotherapy courses in patients with stage IIE disease.
期刊介绍:
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management is an international, peer-reviewed journal of clinical therapeutics and risk management, focusing on concise rapid reporting of clinical studies in all therapeutic areas, outcomes, safety, and programs for the effective, safe, and sustained use of medicines, therapeutic and surgical interventions in all clinical areas.
The journal welcomes submissions covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary. The journal will consider case reports but only if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature.
As of 18th March 2019, Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.
The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.