Linda V Sinclair, Celine Barthelemy, Doreen A Cantrell
{"title":"单细胞葡萄糖摄取测定:警示故事。","authors":"Linda V Sinclair, Celine Barthelemy, Doreen A Cantrell","doi":"10.20900/immunometab20200029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Assays to monitor the metabolic state or nutrient uptake capacity of immune cells at a single cell level are increasingly in demand. One assay, used by many immunologists, employs 2-(<i>N</i>-(7-Nitrobenz-2-oxa-1,3-diazol-4-yl)Amino)-2-Deoxyglucose (2-NBDG), a fluorescent analogue of 2-deoxyglucose (2DG), as a substrate for glucose transporters. This molecule has been validated as a substrate for the glucose transporter Glut2 (Slc2a2) in mammalian cells but 2-NDBG selectivity for the glucose transporters expressed by T cells, Glut1 (Slc2a1) and Glut3 (Slc2a3), has never been explored. Nor has the possibility that 2-NBDG might bind to T cells that do not express glucose transporters been assessed. In this technical commentary we interrogate the specificity of 2-NBBG labelling as a readout for glucose transport in T lymphocytes. We compare flow cytometric 2-NBDG staining against well validated radiolabelled glucose transport assays in murine T cells. Our data show there can be a large discordance between glucose transport capacity and 2-NBDG labelling in T cells. We also find that 2-NBDG uptake into murine T cells is not inhibited by competitive substrates or facilitative glucose transporter inhibitors, nor can 2-NBDG competitively block glucose uptake in T cells. Collectively, these data argue that 2-NBDG uptake alone is not a reliable tool for the assessment of cellular glucose transport capacity.</p>","PeriodicalId":13361,"journal":{"name":"Immunometabolism","volume":"2 4","pages":"e200029"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7116014/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Single Cell Glucose Uptake Assays: A Cautionary Tale.\",\"authors\":\"Linda V Sinclair, Celine Barthelemy, Doreen A Cantrell\",\"doi\":\"10.20900/immunometab20200029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Assays to monitor the metabolic state or nutrient uptake capacity of immune cells at a single cell level are increasingly in demand. One assay, used by many immunologists, employs 2-(<i>N</i>-(7-Nitrobenz-2-oxa-1,3-diazol-4-yl)Amino)-2-Deoxyglucose (2-NBDG), a fluorescent analogue of 2-deoxyglucose (2DG), as a substrate for glucose transporters. This molecule has been validated as a substrate for the glucose transporter Glut2 (Slc2a2) in mammalian cells but 2-NDBG selectivity for the glucose transporters expressed by T cells, Glut1 (Slc2a1) and Glut3 (Slc2a3), has never been explored. Nor has the possibility that 2-NBDG might bind to T cells that do not express glucose transporters been assessed. In this technical commentary we interrogate the specificity of 2-NBBG labelling as a readout for glucose transport in T lymphocytes. We compare flow cytometric 2-NBDG staining against well validated radiolabelled glucose transport assays in murine T cells. Our data show there can be a large discordance between glucose transport capacity and 2-NBDG labelling in T cells. We also find that 2-NBDG uptake into murine T cells is not inhibited by competitive substrates or facilitative glucose transporter inhibitors, nor can 2-NBDG competitively block glucose uptake in T cells. Collectively, these data argue that 2-NBDG uptake alone is not a reliable tool for the assessment of cellular glucose transport capacity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13361,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Immunometabolism\",\"volume\":\"2 4\",\"pages\":\"e200029\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7116014/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Immunometabolism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20900/immunometab20200029\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Immunometabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20900/immunometab20200029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在单细胞水平监测免疫细胞新陈代谢状态或营养摄取能力的检测方法需求越来越大。许多免疫学家使用的一种检测方法是将 2-(N-(7-硝基苯并-2-氧杂-1,3-二唑-4-基)氨基)-2-脱氧葡萄糖(2-NBDG)作为葡萄糖转运体的底物,2-NBDG 是 2-脱氧葡萄糖(2DG)的荧光类似物。这种分子已被证实是哺乳动物细胞中葡萄糖转运体 Glut2(Slc2a2)的底物,但 2-NBDG 对 T 细胞表达的葡萄糖转运体 Glut1(Slc2a1)和 Glut3(Slc2a3)的选择性却从未被研究过。也没有评估过 2-NBDG 与不表达葡萄糖转运体的 T 细胞结合的可能性。在这篇技术评论中,我们探讨了 2-NBBG 标记作为 T 淋巴细胞葡萄糖转运读数的特异性。我们将小鼠 T 细胞中的流式细胞仪 2-NBDG 染色与经过充分验证的放射性标记葡萄糖转运测定进行了比较。我们的数据显示,T 细胞的葡萄糖转运能力与 2-NBDG 标记之间可能存在很大差异。我们还发现,小鼠 T 细胞对 2-NBDG 的摄取不会受到竞争性底物或促进性葡萄糖转运抑制剂的抑制,2-NBDG 也不能竞争性地阻断 T 细胞对葡萄糖的摄取。总之,这些数据表明,单纯的 2-NBDG 摄取并不是评估细胞葡萄糖转运能力的可靠工具。
Single Cell Glucose Uptake Assays: A Cautionary Tale.
Assays to monitor the metabolic state or nutrient uptake capacity of immune cells at a single cell level are increasingly in demand. One assay, used by many immunologists, employs 2-(N-(7-Nitrobenz-2-oxa-1,3-diazol-4-yl)Amino)-2-Deoxyglucose (2-NBDG), a fluorescent analogue of 2-deoxyglucose (2DG), as a substrate for glucose transporters. This molecule has been validated as a substrate for the glucose transporter Glut2 (Slc2a2) in mammalian cells but 2-NDBG selectivity for the glucose transporters expressed by T cells, Glut1 (Slc2a1) and Glut3 (Slc2a3), has never been explored. Nor has the possibility that 2-NBDG might bind to T cells that do not express glucose transporters been assessed. In this technical commentary we interrogate the specificity of 2-NBBG labelling as a readout for glucose transport in T lymphocytes. We compare flow cytometric 2-NBDG staining against well validated radiolabelled glucose transport assays in murine T cells. Our data show there can be a large discordance between glucose transport capacity and 2-NBDG labelling in T cells. We also find that 2-NBDG uptake into murine T cells is not inhibited by competitive substrates or facilitative glucose transporter inhibitors, nor can 2-NBDG competitively block glucose uptake in T cells. Collectively, these data argue that 2-NBDG uptake alone is not a reliable tool for the assessment of cellular glucose transport capacity.