经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)可改变健康受试者下肢皮质兴奋性:综述与方法学研究

Frontiers in neurology and neuroscience research Pub Date : 2020-01-01 Epub Date: 2020-10-08
John Tyler Floyd, Chad Lairamore, Mark Kevin Garrision, Adam J Woods, Jacqueline L Rainey, Thomas Kiser, Prasad R Padala, Mark Mennemeier
{"title":"经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)可改变健康受试者下肢皮质兴奋性:综述与方法学研究","authors":"John Tyler Floyd,&nbsp;Chad Lairamore,&nbsp;Mark Kevin Garrision,&nbsp;Adam J Woods,&nbsp;Jacqueline L Rainey,&nbsp;Thomas Kiser,&nbsp;Prasad R Padala,&nbsp;Mark Mennemeier","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been used to alter cortical excitability of the lower extremity (LE) and to influence performance on LE tasks like ankle tracking accuracy; but no study, to our knowledge, ever reported a significant change in cortical excitability relative to sham-tDCS. Additionally, because several different electrode montages were used in previous studies, it is difficult to know how stimulation should be applied to achieve this effect. Our objective was to determine whether active-tDCS alters cortical excitability of the LE and ankle tracking accuracy relative to sham-tDCS in healthy participants. The efficacy of two electrode montages and two conductance mediums were compared.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A triple-blind, fully randomized, within-subjects study was conducted with healthy participants (N=18, 24.2 (6.6) years). Cortical recruitment curves and measures of ankle tracking accuracy for the dominant lower extremity were obtained before and after participants received active-tDCS at 2 milliamps for 20 minutes using montage-medium combinations of M<sub>1</sub>-SO:Saline, M<sub>1</sub>-SO:Gel, C1-C2:Saline, and C1-C2:Gel and a sham-tDCS condition (M1-SO: Saline).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The motor evoked potential maximum of the recruitment curve was significantly lower for active than sham-tDCS, but only for the M<sub>1</sub>-SO:Saline combination. No other significant differences in the recruitment curve parameters or in ankle tracking were found.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first study to our knowledge to demonstrate a significant difference in cortical excitability of the LE between active and sham-tDCS conditions. Given the order in which the experimental procedures occurred, the result is consistent with the concept of a homeostatic plasticity response.</p>","PeriodicalId":93097,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in neurology and neuroscience research","volume":"1 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7710335/pdf/nihms-1640908.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Can Alter Cortical Excitability of the Lower Extremity in Healthy Participants: A Review and Methodological Study.\",\"authors\":\"John Tyler Floyd,&nbsp;Chad Lairamore,&nbsp;Mark Kevin Garrision,&nbsp;Adam J Woods,&nbsp;Jacqueline L Rainey,&nbsp;Thomas Kiser,&nbsp;Prasad R Padala,&nbsp;Mark Mennemeier\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been used to alter cortical excitability of the lower extremity (LE) and to influence performance on LE tasks like ankle tracking accuracy; but no study, to our knowledge, ever reported a significant change in cortical excitability relative to sham-tDCS. Additionally, because several different electrode montages were used in previous studies, it is difficult to know how stimulation should be applied to achieve this effect. Our objective was to determine whether active-tDCS alters cortical excitability of the LE and ankle tracking accuracy relative to sham-tDCS in healthy participants. The efficacy of two electrode montages and two conductance mediums were compared.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A triple-blind, fully randomized, within-subjects study was conducted with healthy participants (N=18, 24.2 (6.6) years). Cortical recruitment curves and measures of ankle tracking accuracy for the dominant lower extremity were obtained before and after participants received active-tDCS at 2 milliamps for 20 minutes using montage-medium combinations of M<sub>1</sub>-SO:Saline, M<sub>1</sub>-SO:Gel, C1-C2:Saline, and C1-C2:Gel and a sham-tDCS condition (M1-SO: Saline).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The motor evoked potential maximum of the recruitment curve was significantly lower for active than sham-tDCS, but only for the M<sub>1</sub>-SO:Saline combination. No other significant differences in the recruitment curve parameters or in ankle tracking were found.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first study to our knowledge to demonstrate a significant difference in cortical excitability of the LE between active and sham-tDCS conditions. Given the order in which the experimental procedures occurred, the result is consistent with the concept of a homeostatic plasticity response.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93097,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in neurology and neuroscience research\",\"volume\":\"1 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7710335/pdf/nihms-1640908.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in neurology and neuroscience research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/10/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in neurology and neuroscience research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/10/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)被用于改变下肢皮质兴奋性,并影响下肢皮质兴奋性任务的表现,如踝关节跟踪准确性;但据我们所知,还没有研究报道过皮层兴奋性与假tdcs相关的显著变化。此外,由于在以前的研究中使用了几种不同的电极蒙太奇,因此很难知道应该如何应用刺激来达到这种效果。我们的目的是确定与假tdcs相比,活跃tdcs是否会改变健康参与者的LE皮质兴奋性和踝关节跟踪准确性。比较了两种电极蒙太奇和两种电导介质的效果。方法:采用三盲、完全随机、受试者内研究,健康受试者(N=18, 24.2(6.6)岁)。在参与者使用蒙太奇介质组合(M1-SO:生理盐水、M1-SO:凝胶、C1-C2:生理盐水和C1-C2:凝胶)和假tdcs条件(M1-SO:生理盐水)接受2毫安、持续20分钟的主动tdcs之前和之后,获得了主要下肢的皮质恢复曲线和踝关节跟踪准确性测量。结果:活动组的运动诱发电位最大值明显低于假tdcs组,但只在M1-SO:Saline组。在招募曲线参数或踝关节跟踪方面没有发现其他显著差异。结论:据我们所知,这是第一个证明LE皮层兴奋性在活动和假tdcs状态之间存在显著差异的研究。考虑到实验过程发生的顺序,结果与稳态塑性响应的概念一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Can Alter Cortical Excitability of the Lower Extremity in Healthy Participants: A Review and Methodological Study.

Objective: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been used to alter cortical excitability of the lower extremity (LE) and to influence performance on LE tasks like ankle tracking accuracy; but no study, to our knowledge, ever reported a significant change in cortical excitability relative to sham-tDCS. Additionally, because several different electrode montages were used in previous studies, it is difficult to know how stimulation should be applied to achieve this effect. Our objective was to determine whether active-tDCS alters cortical excitability of the LE and ankle tracking accuracy relative to sham-tDCS in healthy participants. The efficacy of two electrode montages and two conductance mediums were compared.

Methods: A triple-blind, fully randomized, within-subjects study was conducted with healthy participants (N=18, 24.2 (6.6) years). Cortical recruitment curves and measures of ankle tracking accuracy for the dominant lower extremity were obtained before and after participants received active-tDCS at 2 milliamps for 20 minutes using montage-medium combinations of M1-SO:Saline, M1-SO:Gel, C1-C2:Saline, and C1-C2:Gel and a sham-tDCS condition (M1-SO: Saline).

Results: The motor evoked potential maximum of the recruitment curve was significantly lower for active than sham-tDCS, but only for the M1-SO:Saline combination. No other significant differences in the recruitment curve parameters or in ankle tracking were found.

Conclusions: This is the first study to our knowledge to demonstrate a significant difference in cortical excitability of the LE between active and sham-tDCS conditions. Given the order in which the experimental procedures occurred, the result is consistent with the concept of a homeostatic plasticity response.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信