下颌张开力的测量是否有助于颞下颌疾病的诊断?

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Jithendra Ratnayake, Guangzhao Guan, Ajith Polonowita, Kai Chun Li, Andrew R Gray, J Neil Waddell, Carolina Loch, Paul A Brunton
{"title":"下颌张开力的测量是否有助于颞下颌疾病的诊断?","authors":"Jithendra Ratnayake,&nbsp;Guangzhao Guan,&nbsp;Ajith Polonowita,&nbsp;Kai Chun Li,&nbsp;Andrew R Gray,&nbsp;J Neil Waddell,&nbsp;Carolina Loch,&nbsp;Paul A Brunton","doi":"10.11607/ofph.2587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To investigate the effectiveness of a novel jaw-opening-force measuring device as a screening tool to aid in the diagnosis of temporomandibular disorders (TMD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Symptomatic TMD patients (n = 58) and control TMD-free participants (n = 56) were screened by an oral medicine specialist according to the Diagnostic Criteria for TMD (DC/TMD). TMD patients were divided into three subcategories based on TMD symptoms (myofascial pain, disc displacement, and both combined). Jaw-opening forces were measured in both groups with an adjustable head device connected to a 1,000-N-load cell. Seven attempts were recorded at 10-second intervals by a data-capturing system. The geometric mean force values were obtained after discarding the first and last attempts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>TMD-free participants had greater jaw-opening forces than TMD patients both without and with adjustments for age, sex, height, and weight (both P < .001). The geometric mean ± standard deviation values for TMD patients were 18.5 ± 1.62 N and 47.7 ± 1.53 N for TMD-free participants. Differences in jaw-opening forces among the three TMD subcategories were not statistically significant; however, patients with disc displacement (23.7 ± 1.46 N) had greater jaw forces than patients with myofascial pain (17.0 ± 1.74 N) and both myofascial pain and disc displacement (17.0 ± 1.56 N).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrated that differences in jaw-opening forces could be used as a diagnostic tool for TMD. Future studies should explore the potential of this device to measure improvement in jaw-opening forces following TMD treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":48800,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache","volume":"34 3","pages":"199-205"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.11607/ofph.2587","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can the Measurement of Jaw-Opening Forces Assist in the Diagnosis of Temporomandibular Disorders?\",\"authors\":\"Jithendra Ratnayake,&nbsp;Guangzhao Guan,&nbsp;Ajith Polonowita,&nbsp;Kai Chun Li,&nbsp;Andrew R Gray,&nbsp;J Neil Waddell,&nbsp;Carolina Loch,&nbsp;Paul A Brunton\",\"doi\":\"10.11607/ofph.2587\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To investigate the effectiveness of a novel jaw-opening-force measuring device as a screening tool to aid in the diagnosis of temporomandibular disorders (TMD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Symptomatic TMD patients (n = 58) and control TMD-free participants (n = 56) were screened by an oral medicine specialist according to the Diagnostic Criteria for TMD (DC/TMD). TMD patients were divided into three subcategories based on TMD symptoms (myofascial pain, disc displacement, and both combined). Jaw-opening forces were measured in both groups with an adjustable head device connected to a 1,000-N-load cell. Seven attempts were recorded at 10-second intervals by a data-capturing system. The geometric mean force values were obtained after discarding the first and last attempts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>TMD-free participants had greater jaw-opening forces than TMD patients both without and with adjustments for age, sex, height, and weight (both P < .001). The geometric mean ± standard deviation values for TMD patients were 18.5 ± 1.62 N and 47.7 ± 1.53 N for TMD-free participants. Differences in jaw-opening forces among the three TMD subcategories were not statistically significant; however, patients with disc displacement (23.7 ± 1.46 N) had greater jaw forces than patients with myofascial pain (17.0 ± 1.74 N) and both myofascial pain and disc displacement (17.0 ± 1.56 N).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrated that differences in jaw-opening forces could be used as a diagnostic tool for TMD. Future studies should explore the potential of this device to measure improvement in jaw-opening forces following TMD treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48800,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache\",\"volume\":\"34 3\",\"pages\":\"199-205\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.11607/ofph.2587\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11607/ofph.2587\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ofph.2587","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:探讨一种新型的下颌开口力测量装置作为筛查工具在颞下颌疾病(TMD)诊断中的有效性。方法:由口腔医学专家根据TMD诊断标准(DC/TMD)筛选有症状的TMD患者(58例)和无TMD的对照组(56例)。TMD患者根据TMD症状(肌筋膜疼痛、椎间盘移位和两者合并)分为三个亚类。两组的下颌张开力都是用一个可调节的头部装置连接到一个1000 - n的称重传感器来测量的。数据捕捉系统每隔10秒记录7次尝试。丢弃第一次和最后一次尝试后得到几何平均力值。结果:没有TMD的参与者比没有或有年龄、性别、身高和体重调整的TMD患者有更大的开颚力(P < 0.001)。TMD患者的几何平均值±标准偏差值为18.5±1.62 N,无TMD患者的几何平均值±标准偏差值为47.7±1.53 N。三种TMD亚型患者的颌面张开力差异无统计学意义;然而,椎间盘移位患者(23.7±1.46 N)比肌筋膜疼痛患者(17.0±1.74 N)和肌筋膜疼痛和椎间盘移位患者(17.0±1.56 N)有更大的颌力。结论:本研究表明,下颌张开力的差异可以作为TMD的诊断工具。未来的研究应探索该装置的潜力,以衡量TMD治疗后下颌张开力的改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can the Measurement of Jaw-Opening Forces Assist in the Diagnosis of Temporomandibular Disorders?

Aims: To investigate the effectiveness of a novel jaw-opening-force measuring device as a screening tool to aid in the diagnosis of temporomandibular disorders (TMD).

Methods: Symptomatic TMD patients (n = 58) and control TMD-free participants (n = 56) were screened by an oral medicine specialist according to the Diagnostic Criteria for TMD (DC/TMD). TMD patients were divided into three subcategories based on TMD symptoms (myofascial pain, disc displacement, and both combined). Jaw-opening forces were measured in both groups with an adjustable head device connected to a 1,000-N-load cell. Seven attempts were recorded at 10-second intervals by a data-capturing system. The geometric mean force values were obtained after discarding the first and last attempts.

Results: TMD-free participants had greater jaw-opening forces than TMD patients both without and with adjustments for age, sex, height, and weight (both P < .001). The geometric mean ± standard deviation values for TMD patients were 18.5 ± 1.62 N and 47.7 ± 1.53 N for TMD-free participants. Differences in jaw-opening forces among the three TMD subcategories were not statistically significant; however, patients with disc displacement (23.7 ± 1.46 N) had greater jaw forces than patients with myofascial pain (17.0 ± 1.74 N) and both myofascial pain and disc displacement (17.0 ± 1.56 N).

Conclusion: This study demonstrated that differences in jaw-opening forces could be used as a diagnostic tool for TMD. Future studies should explore the potential of this device to measure improvement in jaw-opening forces following TMD treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache
Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Founded upon sound scientific principles, this journal continues to make important contributions that strongly influence the work of dental and medical professionals involved in treating oral and facial pain, including temporomandibular disorders, and headache. In addition to providing timely scientific research and clinical articles, the journal presents diagnostic techniques and treatment therapies for oral and facial pain, headache, mandibular dysfunction, and occlusion and covers pharmacology, physical therapy, surgery, and other pain-management methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信