两个团队,一个任务:在枪击事件和其他大规模伤亡事件中使用EMS单位进行医院分诊的研究。

Q3 Medicine
Thomas Simons, Anke Richter, Lauren Wollman
{"title":"两个团队,一个任务:在枪击事件和其他大规模伤亡事件中使用EMS单位进行医院分诊的研究。","authors":"Thomas Simons,&nbsp;Anke Richter,&nbsp;Lauren Wollman","doi":"10.5055/ajdm.2020.0353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent mass-casualty events have exposed errors with common assumptions about response proc-esses, notably triage and transport of patients. Response planners generally assume that the majority of patients from a mass-casualty event will have received some level of field triage and transport from the scene to the hospital will have been coordinated through on-scene incident command. When this is not the case, emergency response at the hospital is hampered as staff must be pulled to handle the influx of untriaged patients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Determine whether the use of emergency medical service (EMS) field resources in hospital triage could enhance the overall response to active-shooter and other mass-casualty events.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A proof of concept study was planned in conjunction with a regularly scheduled mass-casualty hospital ex-ercise conducted by an urban level II trauma center in Utah. This was a cross-over study with triage initially performed by hospital staff, and at the midpoint of the exercise, triage was transferred to EMS field units. General performance was judged by exercise planners with limited additional data collection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>EMS crews at the hospital significantly enhanced the efficiency and efficacy of the triage operation in both qualitative and quantitative assessment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Hospital planners deemed the proof of concept exercise a success and are now experimenting with implementation of this alternate approach to triage. However, much additional work remains to fully implement this change in processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":40040,"journal":{"name":"American journal of disaster medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Two teams, one mission: A study using EMS units in hospital triage during active-shooter and other mass-casualty events.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Simons,&nbsp;Anke Richter,&nbsp;Lauren Wollman\",\"doi\":\"10.5055/ajdm.2020.0353\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent mass-casualty events have exposed errors with common assumptions about response proc-esses, notably triage and transport of patients. Response planners generally assume that the majority of patients from a mass-casualty event will have received some level of field triage and transport from the scene to the hospital will have been coordinated through on-scene incident command. When this is not the case, emergency response at the hospital is hampered as staff must be pulled to handle the influx of untriaged patients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Determine whether the use of emergency medical service (EMS) field resources in hospital triage could enhance the overall response to active-shooter and other mass-casualty events.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A proof of concept study was planned in conjunction with a regularly scheduled mass-casualty hospital ex-ercise conducted by an urban level II trauma center in Utah. This was a cross-over study with triage initially performed by hospital staff, and at the midpoint of the exercise, triage was transferred to EMS field units. General performance was judged by exercise planners with limited additional data collection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>EMS crews at the hospital significantly enhanced the efficiency and efficacy of the triage operation in both qualitative and quantitative assessment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Hospital planners deemed the proof of concept exercise a success and are now experimenting with implementation of this alternate approach to triage. However, much additional work remains to fully implement this change in processes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":40040,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of disaster medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of disaster medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5055/ajdm.2020.0353\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of disaster medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5055/ajdm.2020.0353","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:最近的大规模伤亡事件暴露了对反应过程的普遍假设的错误,特别是对患者的分诊和运输。应对计划者通常认为,大规模伤亡事件中的大多数患者将得到一定程度的现场分诊,从现场到医院的运输将通过现场事故指挥进行协调。如果情况并非如此,医院的应急反应就会受到阻碍,因为必须调动工作人员来处理大量未经过分类的病人。目的:确定在医院分诊中使用急救医疗服务(EMS)现场资源是否能提高对主动枪手和其他大规模伤亡事件的整体反应能力。设计:一项概念验证研究计划与犹他州城市二级创伤中心定期进行的大规模伤亡医院演习相结合。这是一项交叉研究,最初由医院工作人员进行分诊,在演习的中间点,分诊被转移到急救现场单位。一般表现由运动计划者在有限的额外数据收集下判断。结果:EMS人员在定性和定量评价上均显著提高了分诊操作的效率和效果。结论:医院规划者认为概念验证练习是成功的,现在正在试验实施这种替代的分诊方法。然而,要在流程中充分实施这一变化,还有许多额外的工作要做。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Two teams, one mission: A study using EMS units in hospital triage during active-shooter and other mass-casualty events.

Background: Recent mass-casualty events have exposed errors with common assumptions about response proc-esses, notably triage and transport of patients. Response planners generally assume that the majority of patients from a mass-casualty event will have received some level of field triage and transport from the scene to the hospital will have been coordinated through on-scene incident command. When this is not the case, emergency response at the hospital is hampered as staff must be pulled to handle the influx of untriaged patients.

Objective: Determine whether the use of emergency medical service (EMS) field resources in hospital triage could enhance the overall response to active-shooter and other mass-casualty events.

Design: A proof of concept study was planned in conjunction with a regularly scheduled mass-casualty hospital ex-ercise conducted by an urban level II trauma center in Utah. This was a cross-over study with triage initially performed by hospital staff, and at the midpoint of the exercise, triage was transferred to EMS field units. General performance was judged by exercise planners with limited additional data collection.

Results: EMS crews at the hospital significantly enhanced the efficiency and efficacy of the triage operation in both qualitative and quantitative assessment.

Conclusions: Hospital planners deemed the proof of concept exercise a success and are now experimenting with implementation of this alternate approach to triage. However, much additional work remains to fully implement this change in processes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of disaster medicine
American journal of disaster medicine Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: With the publication of the American Journal of Disaster Medicine, for the first time, comes real guidance in this new medical specialty from the country"s foremost experts in areas most physicians and medical professionals have never seen…a deadly cocktail of catastrophic events like blast wounds and post explosion injuries, biological weapons contamination and mass physical and psychological trauma that comes in the wake of natural disasters and disease outbreak. The journal has one goal: to provide physicians and medical professionals the essential informational tools they need as they seek to combine emergency medical and trauma skills with crisis management and new forms of triage.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信